JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Opinion:I bought it around 2005, overused and I continue to use it professionally, from fashion to the outdoor theater where the stabilizer and 'fundamental, it has not disappointed me so much that I never even felt the need to try the series despite 2 all men speak well. rnHa "character", and on my own this and 'the most' important thing in a obiettivo.rnFa part of my basic kit and do not think to change it. rn
Cons:Weight, not very crisp compared to the first series and the series II.
Opinion:I had it in the test and I used it on canon 5d mark II. For what it costs, unfortunately, is not as sharp as the other two before and after this. Mysteries of canon. Prefer the model without stabilized but with a high sharpness as the Series II. Too bad, however, because of high construction as ever for the series L. disfigures really than 2 brothers including the version f4 less bright. I am sorry but it is not bigotry. I would not even given. Regarding the sharpness is not only up to the other. Excuse me also Canon ....
Pros:A tank L series, sealed, sufficiently crisp and clear aperture wide open, stabilization by 2 stops, as heavy as needed to balance a body 1D/1DS. Practically did not know what chromatic aberration and flare. AF fast and accurate.
Cons:The cost, the model series II beats it on all fronts.
Opinion:I bought this light back in 2004 (for 1820 € in that Garlasco) and I was almost disappointed because on paper it was the worst of the other 70-200. It seemed to throw away some money, but I took it anyway because it also promised top performance and I thought that I would have preferred a shot less sharp than a blurred picture (in those days was the maximum attainable 1600iso). I have never regretted the purchase and I never noticed some loss of quality, especially if diaphragmed a little. Honestly, I see the limits only now, after having sold in exchange for the Series II which is a bomb in every way. Another positive note is the low-down that allowed me to recover two-thirds of the total, in practice I have spent on this wonderful lens less than the cost of a simple coffee + brioche every Sunday morning for 8 years. And I assure you that the emotions have been many, but many more.
Pros:Robust built flawlessly, sealed, stabilized, bright.
Cons:Pesantuccio some would say, slightly soft at room temperature. I would also add a little pricey at least when I bought it myself.
Opinion:I bought this lens because I needed a stabilized optical bright and tropical needs to work otherwise I would have kept the younger brother f4 unregulated. What about a tank is indestructible, fast autofocus even if not as the f4 in my opinion, at room temperature is slightly soft in the corners (especially my left top corner but there is only scraps to 300%). E 'is heavy in the backpack when mounted in the car, not that you can use but not anywhere near the manegevollezza F4. On the whole, however, is a great lens with a fabulous bouquet excellent definition worthy of a L and the ability to give the shots where the f4 must stop. In conclusion, a lens that is worth the money it costs, but I would not recommend if you do not necessarily need a 2.8 stabilized.
Pros:Optical professional, robust, a real tank, tropical conditions and remarkable performance. Superlative image quality.
Cons:Heavy and certainly not very affordable price.
Opinion:It 'optics that solves most of the situations faced by a sports photographer but also of reportage. The AF is lightning-fast and precise, especially with performance machines is a real chip. The quality is excellent at room temperature, I would say better than closing 1 or 2 stops. Without testing (I do not like) the quality seemed a hair better (200 mm.) 200 2.8 even though I've owned. The colors are beautiful, chromatic aberration, even in strong backlight, is more than acceptable, as well as the vignetting disappears at room temperature and closes to 1.1 / 2 stop. The bokeh despite the optical design has many lenses are soft and comfortable. E 'was exceeded only by the MKII for sale although for many years, but its has a lower price which, although high, is affordable. In short, a perspective that gets hard to sell
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
