JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 242000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Lightness, clarity, detachment of the plans, the possibility of using freehand for short periods.
Cons:No spare parts if it breaks, no stabilizer
Opinion:I have about a week this wonderful lens that I was lucky to find them for sale here on Juza. rnEra just what I wanted. A 500 that did not cost a fortune but it was equally clear and also lighter than its successori.rnrnNe are really excited about it. The quality is excellent even with a 1.4x (I use the Kenko DGX). Excellent speed of focus. Perfect separation from the fund. I find it very three-dimensional compared to what I get with the 300.
Pros:Light weight, optical quality, autofocus speed, resistance to flare
Cons:lack stabilizer, difficulties in finding spare parts if it breaks.
Opinion:I have very little to this point, but you will immediately notice its large optical quality, lightweight, can be used freehand but lacks the stabilizer so the task requires more attention. AF is a chip limiter and the MAF is even more. can not recommend this light! as long as you find it at a great price, parts are hard to find. if I could go back I would do it hands down ... AF confirm that the kenko pro 300 DGX continues to function and the quality and speed is affected insignificantly in .....
Cons:No stabilization, sensitivity to aberrations in backlight (worse than the 300 f/2.8 IS), same story absence spare parts in case of breakage.
Opinion:I went from 300 to 500 Is f/2.8 f/4.5. For me it is a fantastic lens! Believe that the perfect focus on aps-C is the 500mm. And 'the right balance between focal and weight for use in freehand. Who's more, with the Kenko 1.4x DGX the pro f continues to run smoothly. The speed af is very close to the 500 f / 4 Is, despite the old age ... I sold it to move to 400 C, but if I had to buy back a telephoto lens to replace my 400 f/5.6 with a limited number, of course not riprenderei 500mm. These are my personal impressions ...
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
