RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you accept the use of cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM : Specifications and Opinions




Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USMCanon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM

Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM

Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM



The Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM is a macro lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 1996 to 2021 (discontinued). The focus is done by Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM), it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 1176 €;
32 users have given it an average vote of 9.5 out of 10.


If you have used this item, you can add your vote:  

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Canon EF: this lens is compatible with reflex fullframe and APS-C Canon EF.



SpecificationsReviewsCompareBuySample Photos




 Specifications
 Focal lenght   180 mm
 Angle of view   13.7°
 Format   FF, APS-C
 Max. aperture   f/3.5
 Aperture blades   8
 Lenses/Groups   14 elements in 12 groups
 Min. focus distance   0.48 meters
 Reproduction ratio   1.00x

 Features
 Stabilization   No
 Focus   Ultrasonic AF Motor (Ring-USM)
 Internal AF   Yes
 Full Time MF   Yes

 Built and notes
 Tripod ring   Yes
 Extenders   Yes
 Filters   72 mm
 Lens hood   Yes, supplied
 Weather sealing   No
 Weight   1090 g
 Dimensions   83 x 187 mm
Buy Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM, buy on Ebay


Reviews



What do you think about this lens?


Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 209000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.





Google Translate  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.


avatarsenior
sent on April 24, 2021

Pros: Sharpness, RR 1X, very high image quality even with extenders, robustness, very accurate construction and also relatively light, the AF is not lightning, absolutely, but for a macro it is more than excellent, very good the resistance to the backlight, excellent resistance to weathering despite the absence of tropicalization, splendid and characteristic finally the blurry "swirly" that reproduces.

Cons: Basically none since the only limits I can find him, the non-circular diaphragm and the absence of the stabilizer, had not yet been introduced in 1996.

Opinion: Excellent goal. The sharpness is very high already at TA and further improves between f 4 and f 5.6 where it reaches the peak of quality; in practice I do not find its sharpness higher than that of the macro 100/2.8 L IS, but given the almost double focal point if from this point of view one of the two has a limit this, of course, can certainly not be the 180! It is undoubtedly less practical in field use than in the 100, partly because of its much larger weight and size, partly because of the lack of the stabilizer, but freehand use, which is the only one I have practised, is sufficiently comfortable and nevertheless ensures excellent results. Finally, the almost TOTAL control of the background is not possible, which thanks to its reduced angle of field, and the remarkable perspective compression, it is able to ensure... from an exquisitely creative point of view, in short, it is many times ahead of a shorter focal point, even if it were the 100 L.

avatarjunior
sent on August 25, 2018

Pros: Robustness, sharpness, contrast, compatibility with Canon Extender.

Cons: Price, considering the year of production.

Opinion: Taken new a few years to replace a SIGMA 180 f 3.5, the transition was due to one of my whim to have "original Canon L series" Optics. Build quality and robustness are the first thing you notice in taking it in your hand. The yield in terms of quality is very good, (it was no less even the Sigma actually according to me, as well as the Tamron, you know that the macros are all very good), has a fantastic blurred and a really exceptional color rendition. The yield in my opinion is good already at full aperture but it gains further closing, since the greater use in macro is done at closed diaphragms. Although not tropicalized, it is almost as if it were, no problem in the mornings at dawn in the middle of the dew or under the drizzle. It is not a feather, but the tonnage and the materials of the body impose it. Another positive note (this is also the reason why the change from Sigma) the compatibility with the original Canon duplicators, with 2x III maintains a very good quality allowing a greater magnification or greater distance from the most Can Dodge. It ' an outdated optics and perhaps a new version with IS would not spoil for some use more generic freehand even if its use is done almost exclusively on tripod. Only negative, in my opinion, the price considering that it is in production D over 20 years!

avatarsenior
sent on June 06, 2018

Pros: Build quality, autofocus speed, fluidity manual focus ring, brightness, sharpness, tactile feeling.

Cons: Pesantino if carried around all day.

Opinion: Premise. I come from a Canon T90 with kit FD: With the digital jump I took the machine and lenses that I more return the sensations of analogue. I chose the 5d Classic with the 180 macro both used: they form a perfectly balanced pair; The goal, all IN black metal, is beautiful to see and above all an absolute pleasure to challenge and has a convenient ring for manual focus (IN This the helicoid of the FD was unbeatable). The autofocus is fast, even with very little light, as long as it is limited by the special switch: it is comparable to the speed of the 200 f 2.8. I work 99.9% ad f 3.5 together with the 20 mm f2.8 for my outputs: coupled to the right machine is a lens to have for those who love to enjoy the pleasure of taking pictures.

avataradmin
sent on May 18, 2016

Pros: image quality, quality construction, working distance and yield of the background, compatible with teleconverters

Cons: high price (there are excellent alternatives at a lower price)

Opinion: The Canon 180 Macro has been for many years my main macro; from the image quality point of view it is really great: between f / 5.6 and f / 11, the diaphragms that are used more often in macro photography, is really crystal clear. From f / 16 then you lose some detail because of diffraction, and the whole opening is a little less sharp and contrasted, but Aperture that interest me is perfect. Like all macros, it has a slow autofocus, but this is not a problem since you'll almost always used in manual focus. The build quality is excellent; It is not weather sealed but that I have never caused problems, even using it in very humid environments. The long focal allows you to have a great working distance and good bokeh; if necessary, you can mount teleconverters for even more magnification and working distance. In my opinion the main flaw of this is the price toohigher than the competition: spending half you can buy the excellent Tamron 180mm f / 3.5 Macro, that I currently use, and really has nothing to envy to Canon in terms of image quality.

avatarjunior
sent on February 03, 2016

Pros: Sharpness, background blur, building and working distance in macro

Cons: Focus very slow, also would be nice had the stabilizer L 100mm Macro

Opinion: is an optical, clear beautiful, very specialized for the macro and unlike a 150mm or 100mm is almost indispensable the use of the stand for the ratio 1: 1 even if the hand-free tests with moving subjects have given excellent results anyway! rnrnPersonalmente I'd like it even more if it had a system a little faster focus would be phenomenal perspective and more versatile, but then we are talking of a macro is known that searching in a wide range of focus areas to be more fouco lens. I feel the lack of a stabilizer such as 100mm L because it also would be used in other contesti.rnrn is a macro product as it is 96 because it is done well and the number one for macro photography. The working distance is outstanding.




Photos taken with Canon EF 180mm f/3.5 L Macro USM

Foto
Agalychnis callidryas (Red Eye Frog dagi), 008810
by Juza
82 comments, 31866 views
Foto
Barlia dawn
by Andrea Frassinetti
47 comments, 10121 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 8.6 MP

Foto
... under the scratching...
by Giovanni e Davide
145 comments, 4865 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Objective of Mantua
by Nicola De Crecchio
81 comments, 14227 views  [editors pick]
Foto
... White as snow...
by Giovanni e Davide
182 comments, 5070 views
Foto
Melitaea didyma, 008547
by Juza
13 comments, 6720 views
Foto
Empusa picking
by Juza
47 comments, 9192 views


RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
The Cinque Torri views from Lagazuoi
by Juza
25 comments, 12935 views
Foto
Didyma's melitaea
by Nicola De Crecchio
51 comments, 2000 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 21.0 MP

Foto
...Like a painting...
by Giovanni e Davide
139 comments, 2703 views
Foto
Papilio machaon, 016713
by Juza
32 comments, 7399 views
Foto
Cedar
by Pigi47
59 comments, 2761 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 6.0 MP

Foto
Agalychnis callidryas (Red Eye Frog dagi), 010751
by Juza
9 comments, 9640 views
Foto
Two of Maca
by Paolo Viviani
54 comments, 4082 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Two Melitee
by Paolo Viviani
67 comments, 5831 views  [editors pick]
Foto
... Playing with the spores of a fungus...
by Giovanni e Davide
104 comments, 1910 views
Foto
Melitaea didyma of Serapias vomeracea
by Andrea Frassinetti
40 comments, 5175 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 8.6 MP

Foto
... The drying rack and the...
by Giovanni e Davide
127 comments, 2559 views
Foto
Untitled Photo
by Grzehoofr
30 comments, 6062 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Zerynthia polyxena - 014001
by Juza
16 comments, 4202 views
Foto
Cardamines
by Paolo Viviani
42 comments, 2865 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Poly c.
by Rick_della
40 comments, 3060 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 3.8 MP

Foto
Central
by Gandy
80 comments, 4575 views
Foto
Pyrops intricata
by Zajic Jiri
31 comments, 4693 views  [editors pick]
Foto
Agalychnis callidryas (Red Eye Frog dagi), 008806
by Juza
6 comments, 6801 views
Foto
Machaon
by Paolo Viviani
45 comments, 6187 views  [editors pick]
Foto
... After the Storm...
by Giovanni e Davide
147 comments, 2806 views
Foto
... The hug...
by Giovanni e Davide
102 comments, 2504 views
Foto
... Waiting for the cherries...
by Giovanni e Davide
87 comments, 978 views
Foto
Jump ....
by Giovanni e Davide
157 comments, 3536 views
Foto
... his strength...
by Giovanni e Davide
97 comments, 1363 views
Foto
Caterpillar Cucullia of mullein
by Paolo Viviani
68 comments, 6685 views  [editors pick]  
HI RES 4.0 MP



RCE

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)
Foto
Agalychnis callidryas (Red Eye Frog dagi), 010752
by Juza
5 comments, 5168 views
Foto
... A foggy day...
by Giovanni e Davide
117 comments, 2406 views
Foto
Yellow
by Fontanini Massimiliano
45 comments, 12745 views  [editors pick]
Foto
The two leaves (polygonia c-album)
by Gandy
43 comments, 3192 views  
HI RES 4.9 MP

Foto
... courage...
by Giovanni e Davide
89 comments, 1107 views

Next Page »




The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me