JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Fantastic autofocus. Low weight and size. Good battery life. Shooting quality.
Cons:Ergonomics not excellent. Decentralized viewfinder. Stabilization still improvable. One SD slot.
Opinion:I have been using FF and Micro 4/3 for a long time. This is the first APS-C I take, having always considered the format not as small as the micro 4/3 and not of quality equal to the FF. A middle ground, as it actually is. I open the box and discover that the cable and the power supply are missing. There is nothing apart from battery and strap. The arms become heavy. I take it in my hand and immediately wonder who put the two rings in that position. I will never find them on the fly. Arms at lead level. Then, I take it with me and go out. I turn it on while walking and I like the new menu immediately. The screen with touch icons as well. The viewfinder is definitely better than that of my A7C. It is light and small but does not escape from the hands. A little relief. I see a buzzard at a sidereal distance and point it. The A6700, by pressing the AF button set to tracking, hooks it immediately. She moves, the camera follows her. I move the camera left and right and the subject is always in the green pointer. Not bad. Too bad only for the decentralized viewfinder, typical of these compacts, which does not help to find the subject on the fly (with a pushed telephoto is really difficult). I search and find the "usual" cat. Here the A6700 first engages the body, then the head and immediately the eye. He doesn't let go. I start smiling. I go home and open the files with PS (Pure Raw still does not recognize the format). They are my usual test shots, shadows, backlight, from flowers to landscapes. Everything is normal, possibility of recovery shadows and lights not equal to the A7C but better than the OM-5. More evident noise than the FF already at 1600 iso but also manageable by PS / ACR. So I rate size and weight against the microscopic OM-5. As weight we are there, in size there is not an abyss. The lenses are larger but the ones I took (10-20 and others) are not at all exaggerated. And if I want quality and accept weight, I can also put those of FF. I spend the evening exploring the menu, the AF one in particular. And I have confirmation. This small room is a monster. It outclasses my A7C in AF, the menu is from another era, the viewfinder much more acceptable. Then he has the two rings, even if badly put for me. The spark has struck. We will go a long way together!
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
