JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).
By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.
You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here
Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!
There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 253000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
Pros:Weight, cost, autofocus, high ISO output, sharpness raw files
Cons:Weight with certain optics, some limits in non-essential functions.
Opinion:You can not evaluate this machine regardless of cost, I also own the D90 and the D5300, of the three is the one that gives me the best raw even at high ISO, 3200 is much better than the D5300. Some limits in the brackenting and fixed screen functions, but so much quality in the files. Only true limit using non-motorized AF optics is lost focus and exposure meter.
Pros:Small size, photographic quality, cost / performance, ease of use, battery life
Cons:Snapbridge a bit 'limited view of the absence of WiFi
Opinion:It is a SLR of fairly small size (little more than a mirrorless), excellent value for money, simple enough to use and that, despite being an entry level, can give a lot of satisfaction thanks to the high quality of the images that you can produce.rnNaturally you need a little 'familiarity with manual commands and raw processing, relying simply to the Auto mode is not achieved much.rnExcellent also the battery life. Only against that I have found is the Snapbridge app, a little cumbersome and limited by the lack of WiFi connection.
Pros:Light, long battery life (with bluetooth off), understandable and intuitive menu, non-tilting screen, low cost.
Cons:lack of wireless, bluetooth lent and if left on affects a lot of battery life, non-tilting screen, supplied lens is not clear
Opinion:I start from the premise that is my first SLR! rnNon I start to do a "technical" review as people more experienced than me have well reviewed this machine (so for technicalities I refer you to other reviews) rnma wait! I tell you what I wanted to read when I was looking for a car to start and I can give an opinion of how I found myself having this camera in my hands, which in the end is what matters! I bought it having a budget even higher than the cost of this machine.rnSo I was a bit 'lost among intermediate models ... and the doubts were many, as you begin to compare the various features such as wireless, rotary screen, touch, fps and various other things that raise the price.rnIn the end I bought this camera pushed (an act of faith can be said) by a much more experienced person ... I was hesitant at the beginning .. but I changed my mind! rnMi I find it very well! I did not miss anything, on the contrary ... the absence of future "advanced "allows a very long battery life .. that for a beginner is a plus not indifferent as losing in the settings, in regard to shots etc etc., you will not leave on foot on the most beautiful! rnI am increasingly happy to have it and I I'm very fond of it! rnVe the advice so much (as long as you change the lens as soon as possible)! rnParlo counter, the included lens does not like, is not very clear and is not very bright but still good. You can change it as soon as possible, maybe you take a fixed 35mm lens (if they are for a few hundred euros) and you will see a huge difference in shots !! I personally use old 70's nikkor lenses manual that are great (I had it already) and I bought a tamron 70-300 f4-5.6 to get a zoom.rnThe 18-55 lens provided does not use it much more.rnE cmqrn
Cons:Pentaspecchio viewfinder, limited Snapbridge, JPG a little flat, integrated Flash not very functional
Opinion:I had this camera tested by nikon for some time. In my opinion it is a great entry level camera. It offers everything you need to the amateur photographer who wants to approach the world of photography without spending a capital, with an excellent performance in those that are the majority of common life needs. Clearly this camera has many limitations to be able to keep such a low cost, but Image quality is pretty much the same as higher-end APS-C cameras. It can therefore be a valuable companion for many adventures, even with the 18-55 kit that gave me a try. in my opinion, however, it is better to combine it at least at 18-105 Nikkor (to be taken in kit) and a 35 f / 1.8 DX (to be purchased separately). Together with these two objectives it will be possible to learn how to photograph without having too many limitations.rnYou can find my full review on my website.
Pros:Lightweight, great value for money, good high output, same processor and top series sensor
Cons:Bracketing shortage, internal autofocus engine failure, not compatible with old optics, raw files not compatible with some mac os operating systems
Opinion:I was mainly photographed for pleasure during my travels and trips, so I was looking for a light camera and it was not embarrassing to the movements. Given the prices of the mirrorless or compact professional (honestly overvalued), I bought this little nikon reflex and I found it great. Same functionality of my old d7000 and pictures, as far as I'm concerned, of the same level if not higher (with half weight). I've paired it with a 35mm 1.8 and I'm always with me, no problem. "I'm not able to give more technical feedback, but having photographed for over 40 years, I think I can recommend it to all amateur photographers looking for a car capable of delivering great images without becoming an unbearable footprint and a senseless blow to their portfolio.
Pros:Small, fast buffer with SDXC cards, great to start. More than good made to ISO highs. Battery life spectacular. Price (360 Eur Kit 18-55 on Ebay).
Cons:Its big advantage for big hands is a disadvantage, recommended battery grip (only compatible). For the rest no particular defect for his band.
Opinion:I started re-shooting in reflexes after a long time, file yield is very good with entry level kit 18-55, improves usability by coupling an optic such as the Tamron 17-80 2.8 or equivalent in focal excursion. It's fast and precise in focus, it's obviously not a tool for professionals or even advanced cameras, at least in terms of features or market share or for the ability to mount dated optics because it is not equipped with a focus motor internal. Great to start if you do not want to spend too much, repay with some beautiful files. I think the jpg yield is better, as the colors are (for me) not saturated. Raw is well elaborate in post. I'm fine, I suggest to all those who want to get closer to the reflex world. From the best of himself if used in manual, so does the school to understand diaphragm and iso times. On the negative notes read everywhere on Snapbridge I just want to say that does his job and does it well without affecting much battery life (eternal ...) but is%True 3B can not be taken remotely, but a "prime" remote control is also available with 6-8 Euros. It is convenient to take pictures and find almost simultaneous images on the phone. We are all "social" so no offense to the purists, but the lens of this beautiful reflex is definitely another, much younger, and I think it is a good choice to bring them to this wonderful passion for photography.
Pros:Great value for money (found in kit at 390 €).
Cons:Accessibility Compatibility, to date very limited
Opinion:I claim I'm a neophyte and that this is my first dslr. I do not want to make a real review as I do not have the necessary experience nor the terms of comparison, I just want to warn those who, like me, move the first steps towards the world of photography and look at this jewel. In fact, the d3400 comes with an HDMI port, stream for PCs and the like, and a micro USB port for accessories. So far after two months of research I could not find a compatible range, either Nikon's original or third-party, when the accessories for the younger sister D3300 with the 10-pin port (if I did not) abound. "Not bad," I said, with the new and snapshot SnapBridge technology I can safely control it remotely ... eh no! Because it jumps out that this function for SnapBridge is only enabled for the successive series (5xxx and 7xxx from what I understand) and as if that was not enough they deleted the wifi from the body. In short the feeling is that of a heavy downgrade of the potentialities ofthe room. "Do you want to make time lapse? Buy a d7200" .More of history I had to build minecraft style interval. If I knew before I would have taken a d3300.
Pros:Excellent camera, maintains a low noise at high ISO, lightweight and ergonomic, the battery has a long life.
Cons:Nothing for me.
Opinion:Excellent Entry Level for those who want to begin it wants to go forward too as a professional, being also very light there is to have fun, live view function to shoot video and panoramic photos, ease of use to master the camera, very powerful built-in Flash, AF very fast, in short, an excellent purchase, are very satisfied with this camera.
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.
