|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on January 20, 2025 Pros: Dual SD slots, key ergonomics Cons: For now I haven't found anything Opinion: Nowadays I come from a canon eos RP and I switched to the R7 even if it is apsc I am happy for its ergonomics, after it is also convenient to have the double sd slot, I also use it to make small non-professional videos and I see that it holds well the 4k and you can also record with the Clog profile.the buttons are also placed in the places that if you have to vary the shutter speeds are comfortable. |
 | sent on November 15, 2024 Pros: Good sensor for a light APSC excellent stabilization, especially with dedicated R series lenses Cons: Viewfinder that borders on the obscene Opinion: All in all it could be a good camera, but for me who comes from reflexes, that viewfinder is unacceptable: With sunglasses it does not activate, if you are not perfectly online it does not turn on, slow ignition times, cartoon vision scadente.si lose many photos on the fly ... and not only Light, for those who use Canon quite intuitive, good workable files, excellent compatibility with EF lenses that do not lose quality. Double slot, which is always an advantage, excellent gripability, especially for me who does not have very large hands. The autofocus is sometimes incomprehensible, you are never sure of the subject's lock. Sometimes it doesn't hook it at all, but when it does it behaves well I hope for an r7 mk 2 without these impediments |
  | sent on October 09, 2024 Pros: Really low price. "Infinite" battery. Versatility Autofocus valid in the amateur environment Cons: Low quality materials, viewfinder really too dark and not very readable, Rolling Shutter. Good image quality but slightly inferior to all other competitor APSCs in terms of dynamic range, file cleanliness and ISO tightness. Valid autofocus but obviously not up to the level of the flagships. Keys and dials that are not very intuitive Opinion: |
 | sent on August 24, 2024 Pros: Lightness, price, technology Cons: Excessive noise, not suitable for sub-high-level lenses Opinion: I used it with satisfaction both on RF 800mm f11 and on RF 100-500, unfortunately I bought the new 200-800 and having the R7 a sensor with high pixel density, with a lens not as excellent as that shows its limits. Even greater disappointment was given to me by the 200-800 that everyone painted as an excellent lens, but perhaps because I came from the 100-500 it disappointed me a lot and there are those who insist on saying that it is in fact one of the L series even if it does not have the red ring |
 | sent on February 22, 2024 Pros: Low weight, state-of-the-art technology, advanced autofocus, crop factor 1.6 excellent for getting closer to subjects Cons: beautiful in many ways but personally the feeling didn't click Opinion: For a technical and detailed review I refer to the one made by Juza on these pages https://www.juzaphoto.com/article.php?l=it&t=4682538Io I limit myself to my opinion: the camera itself is cool, like the autofocus with eye tracking and the recognition of subjects between person, animal and vehicle; but also many other features that make life on board comfortable, without forgetting the fact that it is very light and having to work on it for so many hours in the end the arms thank you. But... except for the initial infatuation, the spark never went off (the noise of the shutter is really terrible and the small size always gives the idea of having a toy in your hands) and after a few months I resold it taking the shrimp step and adopting a 7D Mark II as APSC. But, as I said before, it was a choice dictated by the lack of feeling and not by the quality of the car. |
 | sent on December 30, 2023 Pros: Sensor density; APS C ; autofocus responsiveness; lightness; dynamic range which, despite being limited, is sufficient for me; 4k crop; Wheel placed at the top to surround the joystick (which I prefer over the one at the bottom of the R5, R6...) Photo video switch; video capabilities; precapture. Cons: Aps c (depending on the point of view) ; inconsistent autofocus especially in low-light conditions; resistance to ISO; battery life; no battery grip; absence of a third wheel, which makes it difficult to operate completely manually; Opinion: I've been using this camera for about a year now and despite its many flaws I would recommend it to anyone looking for a good aps c in this price range. The biggest flaw and the one I would like to talk about is the autofocus which is more reactive than that of an r5 in recognizing the animal but also much more inconsistent and prone not to be very sticky. In low light conditions the autofocus really struggles but after a lot of practice on the menu settings I was able to increase the success rate thus reducing the out-of-focus results. The autofocus with the electronic shutter works better, but you encounter rather heavy image distortions that tend to be very noticeable on moving animals; with the electronic shutter first curtain you avoid these distortions and still have a good autofocus; I don't recommend the mechanical shutter because the rate of out-of-focus photos is higher. If you use high frames, the photos in focus decrease strangely compared to using a few frames per second. As for the iso resistance, I have to admit that I got amazing results even at iso 5000 but only with light backgrounds and subjects that filled the frame; as for the other situations I would not exceed 3200 iso whose file after a pass on DXO PURE RAW 3 is very clean. Video skills are the best thing about this camera, although I have to admit that I don't do a lot of videos and that despite testing a lot of features, I've never really been interested in this area. The r7 remains an excellent camera that, despite its flaws, surpasses in performance any aps c reflex that has ever existed; And even if I feel like recommending it for nature photography, I feel that a choice like : R5, R6 II... is more appropriate and can bring better results... As for the size, I find it a bit small but still usable without too many problems. The sensor of this camera has the right density to allow us a fast workflow of work and files that are not too heavy (the sensor is an important improvement compared to that of the 90d/7dii...). |
| sent on November 08, 2023 Pros: 1) sensor resolution, lower than the R5, which creates less heavy raw to work with in post 2) Latest generation AF compared to the R5 3) native crop of the APSC sensor, with 32 MP 4) versatility 5) 4k video, and 7k oversampling 6) dual slots with SD Cons: 1) high ISO tightness 2) (relatively) reduced manageability of the p.d.c. Opinion: I bought it to go alongside my R6. The main reason is that, being a fashion photographer, the R6's 20mp is sometimes not enough for large prints. I therefore opted for the R7 because of the characteristics that bring it closer to the R5, i.e. those listed above. Both "cons" that are basically related to the concentration of MP in a reduced sensor compared to the R6, if known, can be managed with agility, both by shooting at not too high ISO (in my sector I don't go beyond ISO 800, but in very rare cases), and by using open aperture lenses. In short: good camera body, reliable and performing, excellent file quality (if you take into account the typical "limitations" of this sensor format). |
 | sent on August 13, 2023 Pros: Compact (for many a Pro for me a little less), solid, tropicalized, stabilized, AF system, tracking and subject recognition, excellent burst, battery life, good color rendering, dual SD-UHS II card, full compatibility with FF RF mount optics and with adapter also EF optics. Cons: Electronic viewfinder not very resolute, high iso hold, shooting with very noisy mechanical shutter, lack of Battery Grip, Rolling Shutter, Buffer. Opinion: |
 | sent on July 13, 2023 Pros: Ergonomics, af (impressive), aps-c (a plus that I have been waiting for a long time on a mirrorless so), image quality (for those who know how to manage it), with the ibis all lenses stabilize Cons: Missing a shoulder display, the sensor is not stacked, viewfinder decisively a little lacking Opinion: I've had it for a year now. I use it mainly for macro photography and birdlife. I had several SLRs and I had been waiting for a long time for a 7D mirrorless that finally arrived. I read with amazement of a poor quality of images but it seems to me that these are the ones that speak both here and in other portals. Obviously they are the images of those who know how to use it ... the sensor is dense and can not clearly have the tightness of an FF but if you know how to manage it (from a correct shooting phase to the final processing) the satisfactions come immediately. The aps-c from 32mpx (in naturalistic a plus as far as I'm concerned) allows great things even with relatively distant subjects. The autofocus is really the strong point of this machine... Now mirrorless really play another game. It is another world and another sport as it recognizes the subjects, recognizes the eye of the animal even if it is distant, if there is little light and on the whole frame. Once before shooting it was focused and recomposed .... Today, in principle, compose without worrying about fire. Impressive speed thanks to the electronic shutter... 30 frames per second.... A video practically. Unfortunately the sensor is not stacked so be careful to use the electronics in certain situations. The ibis works excellently and even thirty-year optics not stabilized as the legendary 400 5.6 come back to life (with this lens I shot handheld quietly even at 1/150 on 640mm equivalent) Robust ... with a nice grip, fully customizable throughout. The price is high but it is worth it and remaining on the reduced format I do not see for now big alternatives without going down to the micro 4/3. Highly recommended especially for those who already have Canon. |
| sent on May 30, 2023 Pros: Robust, good ergonomics, dual boards, lots of features and lots of useful settings Cons: Image quality always very poor (even at low ISO), exaggerated cost for an object classifiable as a toy Opinion: I have been passionate about nature photography for a long time (only photos, not videos), especially I love photographing animals in freedom. After four years spent in Canada where I managed to get excellent photographs, as soon as I returned to Italy I thought of giving myself a new camera, a mirrorless APS-C, with the hope of continuing to take pictures of the scared and distant animals present here. After several months of tests and shots in very different situations with strictly Canon RF or EF lenses, but always of the highest level (100 RF, 100-400 EF, 100-500 RF, 500 EF, 600 EF), I can serenely say that the quality of the images obtainable with this camera is decidedly poor, I would say comparable to that of images obtainable with medium-low range bridge cameras. In particular, I lament a non-existent versatility with regard to high ISO: photography is literally pulped from 1600 upwards, but to be honest at 400 it already shows some serious problems. Worse still, the images produced always have a sort of small, annoying and constant "mosaicization" (especially in the blurred areas or in the contours of the subjects taken), defect almost certainly due to a sensor too dense, I do not know how else to explain it. I let myself be fooled by the positive reviews without considering the negative ones glimpsed in some foreign websites, perhaps those who exalt the quality of the R7 have never tried an R5 or, remaining among the APS-C of Canon, simply an EOS 90D. Canon has produced a camera that I would call the classic lark mirror and it annoys me a lot that this time I ended up among the larks. |
 | sent on May 04, 2023 Pros: Focus, ergonomics, button customization, burst, shutter curtain closes when off, battery. Cons: Stabilizer not very fluid in video shooting, shoulder strap not very comfortable. Opinion: I come from an Eos 750d with which I started shooting and with this R7 we are on another planet. I had read about a possible "trauma" in the transition from optical to digital viewfinder, but to tell the truth not only did I not find difficulties but rather I was pleasantly surprised, despite knowing that there are much better viewfinders than this. The focus is very fast and effective, hooks the face and eye in a surprising way. If correctly set using the buttons in a slightly more professional way, this machine gives great satisfaction. The ISO seal is not at the level of FULL FRAME but still better than the APSC of the past. I happened to shoot for an event and having to deliver the photos within an hour without post-producing I used the jpeg shot that surprised me for the image quality. I think it is a machine not suitable for beginners, to be used at its best it requires a bit of application and knowledge. I was only disappointed by the fact that after a couple of weeks of purchase some pixels of the screen (3/4) burned for no reason, but I was told by the seller that the warranty does not intervene until the number of pixels is less than a certain amount that they could not define me. Problem that however is completely irrelevant to daily use. |
 | sent on April 19, 2023 Pros: Ergonomics, lightness, optical compatibility, stabilization, tropicalization, customization of all buttons and dials, file quality to be an apsc Cons: To tell the truth nobody, it is a well-made machine, except perhaps the shutter noise that is rather metallic and not pleasant. Opinion: |
 | sent on February 09, 2023 Pros: Very complete machine, has practically everything. Cons: APS-C (not necessarily a cons) Opinion: I'm slowly switching from Reflex to Mirrorless, and my first purchase was an R7; I state that I only use EF / EF-s optics with adapter. There is not much to say, from the point of view of color science a remarkable step forward has been made with mirrorless! That said, it is a machine that has practically everything: latest Digic X processor, 4k 60P video without time limits ne crop, C-Log 3, FHD 120P, 32 Mpx (for those interested in resolution), Af Dual Pixel 2 with human and animal eye recognition, 15 fps with the shutter and 30 without (which are then used little because of distortion), focus stacking directly in the car, fully touch articulated monitor, all customizable, double SD slot that can be set as you want, excellent grip even for larger hands (with my hands, the ring at the top falls perfectly where the thumb rests and I find it very useful), IBIS, HDR photos and videos, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, NFC, HDMI 4K 60p output, tropicalization... In short, everything. The only drawback, if you can say so, is the fact of being ASP-C; but it must be said that if it were Full Frame it would cost at least double; in fact, the R6 Mark II (€ 2,989 Canon Store) has many features already present on the R7: I refer to the video department that has the same Bitrate, the same C-Log 3, same AF deriving from the R3 as the R7, 4K video deriving from 6K as the R7 etc. We are talking about a very complete machine, from every point of view, with a burst with mechanical shutter second only to 1Dx3 and a buffer that in C-Raw exceeds 100 Raw without problems (!!!), while in Jpeg you get to exhaustion card (with fast cards). Being APS-C it can mount any lens without any reduction; if you put an APS-C lens on a Full Frame Mirrorless sensor, the camera will decrease the image resolution accordingly to compensate for the 1.6x factor of the lens. The fixed lenses not stabilized are a wonder: I have a 50 1.8 Stm and an 85 1.8 that seem on the tripod, both in photos and videos, with an excellent color rendering and detail! While with stabilized ones the IBIS works differently, compensating only for what does not do the goal. I'm finding myself very well, even if with the electronic viewfinder I still argue a bit, but if you are interested in buying an R7, for me you will not be absolutely disappointed. A different examination must be made for the high ISO that I no longer consider a reference value, especially given that in 2023 there are software that reduce noise in an embarrassing way. While the dynamic range is excellent in any situation, the high iso seal is typical of an APS-C, certainly always a span above APS-C of 2-3 years ago, but do not think that you cry miracle even with R6 or R5, which will have yes and no a stop of real advantage on R7. Up to 6400 you shoot as a few years ago with 5D3 to 3200 and so on, this for Raw and low illuminations; Jpeg are always very clean because the machine intervenes well in noise reduction, even at iso pushed. That said, on gloomy days, but always during the day, you can shoot at 12800 without too many problems if you need it; in the evening the speech changes, but also for Full Frame of any brand. |
 | sent on January 20, 2023 Pros: AF speed and accuracy, burst rate, image quality, dual SD slots, light weight, ergonomics Cons: Shutter noise Opinion: I bought this camera, alongside the R5, to use it practically only in nature shots. Essentially I realized that with the R5 in shots of wildlife and birdlife, in many cases I ended up cropping the file from the original 45 to about 24-30 mpxl, because most of the time the subject (feathered on duty) occupied a portion a little too small in the frame. With the smaller sensor, but of adequate density, of the R7, I therefore find shots to never crop, or almost, with the same lens used. The resolution of the sensor is remarkable, and the final images are completely satisfactory. with DxO Photo Lab noise at high ISO ceases to be a problem even at 12800 ISO and more, but the R7, on its own, holds up well up to 6400 ISO, which is remarkable for an apsc with 32 mpxl. The most convincing aspect of the R7 is however the incredible operating speed: the AF of the R5 is already excellent, but that of the R7 is incredible: it "finds" alone and chases the subject, even in irregular flight, and hooks the eye perfectly. The speed and precision of the AF is combined with the remarkable burst speed (15 ftg/sec with mechanical shutter, and even double with electronic shutter). You can therefore afford the luxury of being able to choose the best composition / pose in an arc of numerous images, all perfectly in focus. Always referring to the sw DxO PhotoLab, the dynamic range seems excellent to me, the recovery of shadows in particular does not give problems, so you can slightly underexpose in recovery with the peace of mind to easily optimize later. The evf viewfinder does not have a record resolution, but for the photographic genre for which I use it enough and advances, and the refresh rate allows "chases" even very fast without response delay. Ergonomics: many have criticized the upward movement of the circular ring on the back, which on the R7 surrounds the AF joystick: well for me instead it is an advantage: usually I set the "wheel" with the exposure compensation function: with the R5 I have to lower my right thumb considerably to adjust the ring, with an unnatural movement, while with the R7 it is exactly where it should be, and the adjustment is more instinctive and immediate. The battery consumption seems to me to be lower than the R5, but I have not done special tests: I simply see that I change battery less frequently. As indicated above, the only aspect that initially left me a bit perplexed is the noise of the shutter: with fast bursts it looks more like an AK-47 than a camera, and in certain shooting situations it could alarm-alert the subject, making him fly away. But I think these are really rare situations, because so far the R7 has allowed me to bring home excellent results, and I am used to noise; In addition, in extreme circumstances, you can always resort to the electronic shutter, which is absolutely silent. Overall, while realizing that my opinion is limited to the use of the R7 only to the genre of nature photography, I am extremely satisfied with this small fast machine gun, worthy heir of the 7DmkII that I used years ago. https://flic.kr/p/2obQ1hv https://flic.kr/p/2o55Qth |
  | sent on September 24, 2022 Pros: Excellent photographic quality with excellent color rendering (photographing in raw format and reworking with Canon DPP), autofocus, burst, high ISO tightness, Focus Stacking in the car, digital lens correction in the car, ability to focus even in the dark, internal stabilizer, price Cons: The photos taken in .jpg format are of excellent quality if using Canon's Picture Style Editor we can make good files. PF3 and it's not easy. Lack of internal flash (for backlit subjects the lack of flash is well compensated by taking an HDR photo where 3 photos are taken in about 1/10 of a second). Lack of a range of RF-S lenses of excellent quality. Opinion: |
 | sent on September 21, 2022 Pros: Amazing AF, satisfying HIGH ISO, TOP Burst, Lightweight Cons: Small body, key position different from R6, no battery grip, sound of the shot a little plastic Opinion: After years of well-deserved service and after being electrocuted by the R6 I retired my 7Dmk2 with 700,000 shots (still working) and I decided to take the little sister ML with APSC sensor. PHOTOS: photo compartment very similar to R6, slightly lower hold at high iso, AF slightly faster, more FPS purchased with 18-150 kit that I thought worse but it is at the level of 24-240 that I own on R6 the best but it gives it with more pushed optics type 70-200 2.8 III or 100-400 II jpeg files from the machine very good and usable, I have not yet tried the Dual Pixel RAW VIDEO: very good stabilization, 4K, Log etc. will make me prefer the R6 in this area even not being a professional videomaker Total Rating: 9 |
 | sent on September 16, 2022 Pros: Lightweight, super AF, good video functions, stabilizer. Cons: for now nothing Opinion: I come from a Canon EOS 70D that gave me so much satisfaction, the comparison, however, is all in favor of the R7. I'm testing it in the open field, even if I prefer landscapes and animals in the landscape context, so I don't do Avifauna pushed. Taken more than anything else x fill the video needs, for now everything seems ok, I tried to make freehand shots and the stabilizer is very good, I need it to make details of effect with telephoto lens or blurs that with Drones and DJI Osmo Pocket 1 and 2 I can not do. Excellent pursuit AF animals or people. I'm testing it for videos paired with the Manfrotto MGV 220 Gimbal. As far as I'm concerned it gives excellent video frames, currently I can not configure the R7 at the Gimbal from the settings of the Manfrotto app (perhaps an update will have to arrive as the R7 is not yet listed). I would say excellent quality with the EFS 24mmf 2.8 Canon and the EFS 40mm f 2.8 , while the 70/200 f 4 L I can not mount it on the gimbal as too long the lens. If you want to see the video result I attach a link where you can see the video. Obviously the shooting with Canon R7 are those made from Earth. https://youtu.be/Q43eHl7CV3w |
 | sent on September 05, 2022 Pros: Lightweight, super AF and top burst. Very satisfactory high ISO seal. Cons: Nothing special, except that it broke out within the month of purchase. Opinion: Used 4 times, then the infamous wording Err. 30. I see a black shadow in the viewfinder; I remove the lens and see a plastic curtain, stuck at the center of the sensor. Luckily they are on time for the return. So much anger and a lot of reflection. I don't know if I'll buy it again; honestly I am very confused. Now I'll move on with my EOS 50D. Of course it can happen, but it leaves a great bitterness in the mouth. |
 | sent on August 29, 2022 Pros: Af, burst, dual sd slot, compact. Cost. Cons: Light? Maybe too much. Viewfinder very but very protruding compared to the camera body. High iso seal. Opinion: At the moment at Canon there are two ML apsc, the R10 or the R7. The R10 has many restrictions compared to the R7, (the most important / evident are the single slot, the absence of the ibis and the shutter speed) so ... trying an apsc ML (entry level) would not have made much sense. The cost of the R7 is far lower than what it offers. In my opinion its real cost equated to its potential would be around you have 2k, surely Canon has preferred a competitive policy and not too excessive. I can make a comparison with the R6, R and Rp. It is a light and compact apsc, very workable and well-defined files despite being a 30mp apsc. AF section more laborious in customization than the R6, but with an extra gear. It is not possible to exclude Ibis in the photo section, only in the video. (I can't make judgments in the video section because I don't.....) I'm testing it in the field used in birdlife with an Rf 800, an Rf 100-500 and a sigma c 150-600, the Af is fast, precise and responsive both with the sigma and with the Canon 100-500, as regards the RF 800 that becomes a 1280mm ... ( if you want to read my review on the optics in questine ..) its use appears very critical. I find the camera body light and compact, perhaps too much, but the handle is deep and very manageable. I do not find the materials absolutely poor or even less obscene, I consider them fair and homogeneous with the type of camera they cover. If we make a comparison based on performance the R7 wins hands down against RP and the R (despite being of two different categories) but if we include the R6 in the comparison, the R7 certainly comes out defeated. This R7 is not a car that drives me crazy, I much prefer the R6 despite being an FF. I think that at the end of my tests (pesronali ) with camera and various optics dedicated if I deprived myself of this ML apsc in favor of the two R6 I would not miss it at all. It is however a camera that I would definitely recommend to those who make svifauna (certainly not combined with an RF 800 ...) or look for mm more than FF. |
| sent on August 22, 2022 Pros: Af, burst, file quality, weight, ergonomics Cons: Plastic quality, absence of battery grip Opinion: For those like me who practice mainly birdlife this machine is a real treat. I combined it with the 100 500 rf and the yield is really amazing. The excellent af combined with the speed of the burst allow you to portray subjects in flight with extreme simplicity. Obviously it is not a perfect machine and some limitation is encountered in the iso seal that with low light holds well up to 6400 (until today I have not gone further). Another limit is that of the buffer which is quite limited (it allows us to take about 40-50 raw photos at 30 fps.). Honestly, this last limit is absolutely irrelevant in practical use since I did not have higher needs than those offered by the r7. Ultimately I can only recommend this camera to those who practice photo hunting |
 | sent on August 18, 2022 Pros: operating speed ergonomics ,, autofocus Cons: high iso seal Opinion: I would like to tell you that the first thing to take advantage of this machine is the fact re crop thing that no fullframe will give you with this pixel density then let's start from the price ,, we can say that overall in my opinion it is an excellent machine for burst speed dynamic range excellent ,, the noise is obviously more present than an r5 or r6 but it is nothing so monstrously invasive up to 5000 6000 iso you go still good then for my skills step over but I repeat this machine makes the difference when you need to get closer to the subject with an excellent operating speed with its excellent sector af ,,,,conclude saying that in my opinion it goes strong especially for the price at which it is proposed. |
 | sent on July 27, 2022 Pros: Lightness and compactness, speed, sensitivity, iso, focusing system Cons: At first use it looks like a toy Opinion: Since yesterday I have the new R7 I started taking pictures and the first impact already seems positive. I sell from an 80 D and I must say that what struck me is the difference in size and weight of the machine with the same standard objectives of the Kit. As I become familiar with the controls and keys of the camera body I will definitely improve the performance. Considering the price less than 2000 € with adapter and lens 18 150 I think that the at is more than adequate for this equipment. The menu much larger than the 80D but easy and intuitive, the lack of flash does not make itself felt. Ultimately for what I could try and see my judgment and certainly favorable to this new system with the same APS-C. |
 | sent on July 24, 2022 Pros: AF Weight, for the rest I will evaluate later but it seems to me a good purchase price and photo quality immediately appreciable even without being familiar with the mirrorles Cons: It seems, I repeat it seems fragile Opinion: I took only about thirty photos but I must say that already with the factory settings the autofocus works very well. I think that by becoming familiar with the controls of the camera body you can have good satisfaction. It will be to be treated with extreme care this is the impression that you have handling it but it seems to me that the electronics and the quality of the photos is really good. Considering the price about 1500 euros with adapter the result that is the photo does not disappoint. Surely the R3 will be another thing but also the price is different and this diversity for hobby photographers we can certainly see in the camera body instead in the file the difference will be there but not so relevant for those who do not have to sell photography but the quality is enough and this seems to me to be all there! |
 | sent on July 23, 2022 Pros: ISO, AF, Speed, Video, 2 sd slots, adapter included Cons: Like all the R5 R6 sisters, resistant polymer construction materials, dimensions (we wait for battery grip) Opinion: The evolution of the Canon EOS 7D Mark II, 33 megapixels in a latest generation apsc sensor, with a surprising ISO seal, equal if not higher than an R5 with the same crop. impressive rate of fire, amazing videos. Congratulations to Canon. The relatively low price, commercial tactic to bring in canon many new customers. machine from 2,500 euros of actual value, I speak as a former owner of R6 and tested R5. |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
