|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.  | sent on June 15, 2021 Pros: all Cons: nothing Opinion: This is an LA camera. After trying and possessing many, I decided that she will stay with me forever. The only drawback is the consumption of batteries, especially in live view, the sensor is very energivore, but honestly it does not matter, because the files it gives are like paintings, I have never seen files with a similar definition and quality, but what is even better are the colors, superb! Every time I shoot with this body I am pleasantly surprised even by the speed of the af module which is very precise, even more precise than my 7D II, which I sold after having it side by side with it. In naturalistic it is perfect, it allows incredible Crops and if you do not need to croppare you get a file with crazy details, I call them delicious, because then you get used to continuing to croppare on every detail of the photo to see "further" and enjoy the immortalized scene better. At first maybe it is difficult to use, you have to know how to use it, but even at high iso it has never given me problems, not even of micromox as many decant, probably without having even tried it thoroughly! Even with dated optics it gives exceptional results, indeed I am often convinced that it gives it a second life. The best machine ever produced by Canon in my opinion, and in the opinion of many colleagues. |
 | sent on May 28, 2020 Pros: True resolution without sharpening, build quality, ergonomics, customization. Cons: Lack of built-in speedlite transmitter, requires uncompromising optics (forget anything that is not fixed optics or L-series), if you have no video claims anything else. Opinion: I delved into that full frame take. I was undecided between 5D mkIV and 5Ds/5Ds r; not that I didn't like the 1Dx mkIII, but I discarded it at the start so I didn't have to sell my kidney. The 5D mkIV I discarded almost immediately because I wanted a more extreme reflex, more shifted on the pure image resolution. Let's start with what are proclaimed as its flaws: micromosso and moiré. I come from an experience born with film on FD, then Eos 450D and Eos 77D. For economic reasons I have no stabilized L optics and I have become accustomed to shooting freehand with the 77D and the 70-200 2.8L. The APSC density of the 77D is significantly higher than the density of the 5Ds r (crop APSC 24mpxl VS. 19mpxl), so if you get used to a dense APSC you won't have micromox problems. Also consider that the mirror movement of the 5Ds r is cushioned and the mass of the machine body softens the vibrations a lot. Moiré: I photographed buildings with perforated sheet as a coating with different zooms, distances, inclinations; fabrics, grids, etc... Engaging for now I have not been able to see moiré, surely it will pop up at the least opportune time, but for now it has not presented itself except in cases visible to the naked eye. Take away these doubts, yes, maybe it is a bit compressed as a dynamic range and the has high iso noise that with 50mpxl you have to wait... On the other hand, flagship Canon (1Dx MkIII) has less than half the resolution just to better tolerate this problem, manage a low 16-point filter and afford to record 14 RAW/sec. It's a choice, it's not a quick and easy machine, but it gives satisfaction to the maniacs of resolution and nuances (finally I shoot panoramas and the foliage is not kneaded). I took a RAW, removed any post-production correction and it's more resolute than the 77D without that annoying forced effect of sharpening; defined and soft at the same time as for those who remember it was Fujifilm Astia 100 on 6x6. On both tests I used the 24-70 2.8L II at f5.6 and the 5Ds r , being less dense as a sensor, also showed fewer defects than the images recorded by the 77D. So look at the new super-resolute APSCs because they will demand extremely defined optics, you will see defects even in the most emblazoned optics. In the menus a lot of customizations, very useful and that should put on all models, is the minimum speed of click under which the sensitivity is automatically varied (which can be forced within a predetermined range). I read that someone called it a defect the lack of a touchscreen; yes, it's convenient, but then you should orient yourself on a mirrorless. At first when you set the reflex it is a bit of a mata to use sticks, keys and wheels, but it is a reflex: the eye must stand of the viewfinder and this body has all the necessary commands on the buttons. The only flaw for me is the lack of an IR integrated transmitter for speedlite that forces me to use one of the two flashes as a transmitter over the reflexes subtracting it from the scene. In 2020, any PC higher than the fifth-generation Intel i7 handles RAW shots in tolerable time, of course if you do 50 levels, masks, filters, etc., maybe you need a good graphics card or reduce pxl after the development of the RAW. In conclusion: do you want uncompromising resolution and soft nuances, but not kneaded? It's your reflex. Do you want to make videos or take home the safe shot even with optics not "top"? choose another model. |
 | sent on October 19, 2019 Pros: Nitify, Raw files ready, Autofocus, Exposure, ergonomics, white balance, 5D quality, double slot, fast wi-fi. Cons: none if you don't need extreme burst, iso very high and need to make videos. Opinion: I had tried the excellent 6D, 6DII, 5DII and 5DIII and was looking for the ultimate machine body for my needs. I'm not making videos, I was looking for a Reflex that just took great pictures. I have been using it for a few months but before the purchase I studied it thoroughly and listened to the directions of a friend who owns it for professional use. The 5DIV is probably more versatile but I don't think the images are so beautiful, especially at the low iso; Moreover, at this time the SR is very cost-effective. Compared to previous bodies the paint is a brighter black and the plastics have been improved to increase grip. When it came out, For Canon's Trade Policy it was presented as a 5d3 for those in need of making large prints. All the bloggers have followed this trail, I think without really trying it. It's actually a real evolution, it's a versatile machine that shares the Battery-Grip with the III. The powerful 50mp sensor offers stunning magnifiers but also allows Crop and downsizing to s-raw and m-raw, I use it mainly at m-raw and when I can use the mirror block function 1/4s. The mechanics have been redesigned to reduce noise, the shot is very quiet and the frame is stiffer, just take it in your hand to understand it. The ergonomics for me is perfect, it looks like the extension of my arm, the controls are simple and the weight is not felt, I use it without shoulder strap. I am an amateur and profane photographer and to increase the pleasure of this hobby this 5DsR prompted me to replace the 24-105 L series with three fixed optics including the Zeiss 21 and 50 mm at MF, maybe I will also take the 85 f/1.4. Surely with optical series "L" is not wrong but I am also satisfied with the very sharp 35 f2 IS and also the fifty f1.8 stm. It seems that this sensor resappears the lenses a little sluggish. Between f8 and F11 you get very sharp images, you don't need to close the diaphragm any further. I also have a 70-300 L tele that for the moment I used only in architecture and with suboptimal light, but the potential is perceived... I hope to return to Africa soon to make us wildlife too. For me not to be underestimated that the wi-fi with W-E1 card is much faster than the native 6D and above all I do not forget it clobbeaned! In conclusion, a success of 10 and praise. |
 | sent on July 19, 2019 Pros: File Clarity - Ergonomics and Command Predisposition - Autofocus - Tropicalization - Double Memories Slots - High Light Recoveries Cons: ISO Estate Over 1600 - Shadow Recoveries - Dynamic Range - Autonomy - Slow in Post-Shooting - Sensitive to Diffraction Opinion: Bought and sold after about 2 months after owning 1000D > 60D > 6D, Grand Machine on the construction side and predisposition of controls, basically it is a 5D Mark III with a 50mpx sensor, in fact it is just nice to hold, the autofocus if set properly does not disappoint never, but the real effect "Wow" is the sharpness of the Files that churns out as long as you mount lenses worthy of the Sensor, even the recoveries of the High lights are very good, but let's move on to the sore notes: if you do landscape and often use the live view you need at least 2/3 batteries , while if you use almost only the mirror the autonomy is not bad, you get about 500-600 shots with the original batteries LP-E6N, but this in the end is a subjective problem, above f5.6 you already perceive diffraction, but the drop that made the vase overflow are the recovering shadows and dynamic range, nothing better than the respective 6D and 5DIII released 3 years before, a real disappointment given the price of the body, in fact before buying the 5DsR I had the 6D and in the recoveries of 2-3 stop the background noise is almost identical , and the 6D with the same ISO was slightly cleaner, for those who say it is a "study" machine I agree only partly for the dynamic range, in fact it was enough to spend a weekend with a D800E to go to the other side and buy a D810, which despite being out 1 year or before in cleaning files are light years away.... Really a shame for Canon, and this confirms the difficulty in reselling it, in fact I had to change it... |
  | sent on March 27, 2019 Pros: Image Quality at 360 °... Good even at 1600/2000 ISO, but up to 1200 the rendering of the images is unbeatable in every point of view... machinability files... Sturdy body and "for me" ergonomic to perfection. Cons: If You use the monitor very little battery autonomy. For me no but maybe for some the burst limited to 5 fps. Heavy Files, it takes a good PC. Opinion: I waited quite a while before reviewing the Canon 5DSR, I wanted to be certain of what I thought and wrote... I do not review the video part because I do not care, I never do. I have been holding and using it for over a year, I took it on the advice of a friend who still owns it, I admit that after a few tests, at first glance I thought I had made a "cavolata"... At the beginning (about a month) there was some difficulty in managing it, but when I went into tune, and after doing (personally) all the settings on the camera combined with the optics I had the pleasure of enjoying all the merits. Reflex particular but rich in content, especially those related to the potential/quality of the image rendered.... Obviously the files are "Pesantucci", it takes a good processor in the PC. Who thinks is a reflex only for a few photographic uses as landscape or studio wrong, it is not so... I do mostly naturalistic, and I can say that it is the best SLR I have owned for that purpose,.. It takes away so many chestnuts from the fire, es: I can crop to 100/150x100 without loss of quality, also have a perfectly sharp subject, which covers a good surface of the finished photo and in case to be presented. Obviously with many Megapixels (RAW 50ml) you have to be careful of the blur, but once understood/managed to handle the results are surprising and unreachable with other cameras. Noise management is good/excellent even at 1600/2000 ISO, and in M-RAW (30ml pix) in the fact of noise the results are identical to the 5DMK3 (which I own).... In RAW at 50ml of pixel up to 1200 ISO image rendering is unbeatable in every point of view, sharpness, color and effect three-dimensionality... The workability in post is very good and in the recovery lights/shadows are absent the artifacts... Zero Bandig, which is sometimes present in the 5d3. Some might say that in naturalistic would serve the burst over 5 Mbps, personally I do not find limiting, of course it is my way of photographing, rarely (almost never) use continuous shots of The autofocus if set well is fast and precise, of course the The lens must be adjusted to the performance request. Even the ergonomics (for me that I have big hands) is perfect, as the feeling of robustness... I'm not going to list all the custom settable functions, one of those (for me) very useful, set the over/under exposure in a click with main wheel. The thing that must be said is that the micro fine adjustment must be done at a point, and that wants lenses/optics performing/solving, with these attentions the result is of sure effect.... A real pleasure to see the results obtained..! A tip to those who wanted to buy or bought it recently, patience and commitment, use it frequently, it takes some time to understand and discover all its potential. I gave a 10 vote in view of the difference in all round performance with other cameras owned, even different serie1. |
 | sent on September 28, 2018 Pros: Exceptional file quality, sharpness and detail at the top, possibility of making incredible crop, "clicking" Many photos from a single. The best for those who do panoramas, fashion, and studio photos. Cons: Weight, autofocus, excessive noise at very high ISO. Opinion: I have for two years the 5DSR and I am very satisfied, it is an exceptional machine for a specific use, that is, you can hate or love depending on what type of photography you intend to do. It is certainly not a machine for all, of the type frames and snaps, it requires a considerable experience to be able to exploit to the fullest all the potentialities. For panoramas and photos from studio or fashion is not rivals, as long as it is combined with high-level optics (L-series) to make the most of the detail. Except of course with full light, it is preferable to always use it with a support to avoid the micro blur that you perceive, but only at maximum magnification. Personally I used it freehand for photos in church or night up to Iso 2000 without problems, also succeeding in making cuttings. It also has a discreet burst that allows, within certain limits to take sports photos, even if it was not born for this kind of use. Autofocus should be improved with multiple points and phase autofocus. The video is certainly not at high levels, but who buys this machine does not seek this. Ultimately this is a machine to use for "quiet" photos and meditate and will give exceptional results, significantly higher than the competition. |
 | sent on June 17, 2018 Pros: Files with extraordinary detail; Ergonomic machine body, solid and beautiful to the touch; Super Autofocus Cons: None relevant; Maybe an excessive number of useless functions for me. Opinion: I have been using Canon's 5 Series for many years. I had the 5d old, the MkII, used several times the MKIII. The 5DSR constitutes in my opinion a further step forward than the previous versions, at least for my way of photographing amateur. I only do landscapes, I will have tripped 3 times in my life over 600 ISO, camera almost always on tripod. I don't need ultra reactive autofocus and a machine gun gust. 3 \ \ 4 of the 5DSR on-camera functions I do not consider necessary, including videos. I obviously seek the best image quality possible so this sensor attracted me a lot and did not disappoint expectations. Never had such detailed and well-contrasted files. Combined with good quality lenses and shrewdness in the shutter settings, it produces exciting results. I have posted one or two test photos for those who want to get an idea of the files that churns. |
  | sent on April 08, 2018 Pros: Very detailed and not difficult to process files, ergonomics and "series 5" controls. Cons: If you know what you buy, no one. Opinion: I agree almost entirely with the previous reviews. I add to have taken with me "on track", Car/motorbike (from the stands). The machine proved to be good even in a genre that should not be the one for which it was born. The AF is, when adjusted, very similar to that of the 5D4 used as a comparison during a 3-hour race (the lens used the 100-400 L IS II "fixed" at 400), then with the possibility of an extended field test. Burst and buffer the only notes. Especially the buffer (I shoot in RAW on both tabs) that does not allow guit if the cars/motorcycles are close together. I tried the crop in the car, both at 1.3 and at 1.6. Crop relative shooting in RAW since then with DPP I can recover the part of the frame "Croppato" possibly cut at the time of shooting. The files are slightly less workable than those of the 5D4, but the thing is irrelevant because in the genre that I do are already good, and because in PP I am not a great...;-). Ultimately I was pleased, as I am happy with the machine when I use it for the genres that compete them. |
 | sent on February 09, 2018 Pros: Detail, noise management, command ergonomics and easy-to-work files. With battery grip, the balance is perfect and the battery life does not create any problem even during long sessions. Cons: It is not a machine suitable for everyone, because the sensor requires a minimum of technique to eliminate problems of blur and management of autofocus. The burst is limited, as is obvious, not therefore suitable for sports photography but fully sufficient for those who want to devote themselves to nature issues. Opinion: I have been using the 5DS R for some time now, combining it first with the 5DIII and then taking its place in normal use. Being used to 5DIII, with the 5DS R I had no difficulty in the ergonomics of the controls and immediately the machine gave me great satisfaction.rnPractical nature photography and macro, but freehand, so I had to take measurements on shutter speeds to avoid the danger of camera shake, but with quality optics this machine is really fantastic! rnThe RAW files are easily workable and allow crop capable of giving emotions; needless to say that I love the detail and in this sense the 5DS R is for me the best, also for the high ISO tightness in normal lighting conditions, which allows me to work with safety times in ambient light only.rnrnHere you can see some shots made with the 5DS R: rnrn https://www.flickr.com/photos/henry62/albums/72157670735285040rnrn |
 | sent on December 27, 2017 Pros: Resolution, ergonomics of the camera, file quality Cons: battery life, sometimes grumpy autofocus Opinion: I bought it for just over a month as a substitute for my 5D mk II. I was looking more for a car with a more performing autofocus. The bodies of the 6D range did not attract me for ergonomics, the 5D mkIII even in used equipment was still at high prices. This 5DSr happened to me at the cost of 5D Mk III and I could not resist. In all above 5D mkIII. I have tested it in all possible conditions and has always behaved stupendously. The last test I did in the ground for her most arduous, that is in the gym with very poor light, artistic gymnastics, high ISO (6400 and over) and autofocus under stress, all excellent. Photo always in focus and very low noise (in absolute, especially if you resample), in any case little "nervous". Obviously if you take it to shoot only and always above ISO 3200, then you need to move towards other bodies. rnCol MRAW format (28Mpx) noise problems are solved obtaining images superior to those of a 5D mkIII even at high ISO. To get the best out of 50Mpx need lenses of the highest level and maybe even a little stabilization does not hurt. Perfect white balance. The only negative neo is the battery life that is lower than that of my old 5D mk II, I'll try with another battery. rnConsigliatissima. rnrnSee some test photos in my gallery (https://www.juzaphoto.com/me.php?pg=226602&l=it) |
 | sent on November 09, 2017 Pros: Extremely detailed file, fine detail detail, ergonomics, useful functions for file / size reduction Cons: Lack articulated display (if I just have to say) Opinion: Acquired with a bit of skepticism and fear after having owned a Sony A7R II, which turned out to be a big machine. It features at least 3 reflexes, a 50-megapixel reflex, and one from the "full frame" sensor and an APSC the maximum detail? Use 50 Mb RAW. Do you want to take a portrait session and are you afraid of the size of the photo series? Use mRAW and you have a 30 megapixel FF from the file anyway great. Want crop? Cut 1.3x or 1.6x and you are equal to a 7D mark II. For me this is very important and he avoided buying (as I often did) different bodies! It has a great function against the microregion during shooting, it is built as it should and the keys are all in the right place. The fine detail of the files is greater than any "big megapixel" sensor I've ever tried, maybe on the recovery wins the Sony sensor ... but if they play it. VERY HAPPY! |
 | sent on October 14, 2017 Pros: File sharpness. Excellent exposure meter and autofocus. Great ergonomics Cons: Files to process rather heavy. Needs good lenses Opinion: I went from 5D Mark III to 5DSR after a span of several months. The 5D Mark III is definitely a great car, and the 5DSR inherits its great features, but increases the resolution and implements a meter that, in my humble opinion, is definitely superior. I did not find microsocial or moirish problems after several hundred shots in various situations and I can say that the car works well in all areas. Certainly not suitable for genres that require great speed but I find it perfect for portraits and landscaping. The incarnate yield is really great and the files do not need much elaboration. I was afraid that high ISO yield was definitely lower than Mark III but that's not the case and it's just noticed on the 6400 iso. Ultimately a great car with a truly sensational image quality. |
 | sent on September 26, 2017 Pros: 50 seconds with great crop capability while keeping the fine detail, crops in asph and apsc, very high QI and my upper bass competition. I say I own a variety of systems including Sony A7r2, unmatched manual versus 5d mk3 and 7d mk2 with greater customization of high-fidelity autofocus inherited from 7d mk2, mirror delay in snap to avoid micromosus, flexibility in sizing raw and jpeg images. Cons: Dense sensors inevitably pay the highest definition with high noise levels, in fact the noise is acceptable up to 3200 iso unless you are recalling a mp resizing. then you can push a little bit more but for my genre it goes more than good .. well click at 1600/3200 non-stratospheric dynamic range but more than acceptable anyway. Opinion: Knowing well the 5dmk3, 7d mk 2 and various Fuji and Sony systems etc .. I can assert that the raw files that the machine generates have a "definition" really never seen before, however it needs some optics that can express it to the best, it is bound to be coupled with the latest generation of fixed or zoomed optical optics. The color rendering is very good and even the incarnate's rendition is not very different from that generated by Fuji (xpro 2 xt2) that I personally love a lot. The machine is born for a specific use .. the studio .. but can be used quietly with stunning results for landscape and fashion and why not for photographic hunting with a good 500 or 100/400 given the possibilities of crop image in the car that makes it automatically an asph or apsc with mp more than enough but with the 3200 ISO limit. I strongly advise the video makers though there is a good setting for the time - lapse in the room but there is no 4k and the headphone socket .. there is only the socket for meexternal crown. |
 | sent on August 06, 2016 Pros: Files very detailed, good iso made for its resolution, excellent color fidelity, light meter new generation, silent mirrorbox, good dynamic range Cons: Raw huge, burst just enough, reflex not for everyone Opinion: I come from 5D3 who accompanied me faithfully for 4 years, about a month ago I switched to 5DSR. Reflex at first twin view, the same arrangement of keys, same menu as 90%, the same f (but with the addition of the matrix rgb ITR), I took even the same battery grip.rnIl sensor 50 mpx gives details never seen before if you do not in medium format, the raw is very affected and contrasted, in post needs a work a little different from other birds in sensori.rnUsata pulls out even the finest plumage, with natural detail (http://www.juzaphoto.com /hr.php?t=1931561&r=71287&l=it), in post sharpness should be given very parsimonia.rnLa dynamics are improved, especially on the shadows, there is no banding but Canon's choice has left less on recovery lights much more easily can get to risk clip.rnLa made on 'complexion is good, more natural leathers. The white balance has been enhanced with a new option: the white priorities. The classic autowhite you tarava sn the average of 'full color scene, now you can set the discriminant: the white will be automatically calibrated on the more neutral tone, with results of 90% perfetti.rnIl AF module is that of 5D3, precise and handsome, has l' addition of 'ITR, ie the fire with RGB matrix (virtually adds the recognition of colors in addition to the classical phase), with the multipliers is much faster than the 5D3.rnLa burst is 5 fps, slower than the 5D3 but extremely silent, so that the silent mode at the time I also useless with a few animals metri.rnL 'meter boasts many more areas than the 5D3 and rarely rod, you may eventually lose its setting in the EV M and AutoISO (a true salvation) .rnI against are easy to imagine, Raw heavy (50 to 80 MB), many occupied cards and slower post on pc.rnNon is a car for everyone, it should be understood and used to the best of its potential, it must be helped with a high isoresize post that leads to a yield (sometimes even higher) to 5D3.rnConcludendo, if you have optical quality and want maximum performance is the perfect choice if you want speed rather you will have to orient yourself on altro.rn rn |
 | sent on June 08, 2016 Pros: Files incredibly rich in detail, very quiet shooting Cons: I already knew what I was getting! Opinion: I seem to have gone back to the seventies, before shooting I have to think about what I'm doing, and that's what I like. It requires high-quality optics, otherwise forget it. Compared to the 5D MarkIII the differences are all right. Overall I can be satisfied. Turning back the buy back. Satisfied. |
| sent on June 08, 2016 Pros: Files incredibly rich in detail, very quiet shooting Cons: I already knew what I was getting! Opinion: I seem to have gone back to the seventies, before shooting I have to think about what I'm doing, and that's what I like. It requires high-quality optics, otherwise forget it. Compared to the 5D MarkIII the differences are all right. Overall I can be satisfied. Turning back the buy back. Satisfied. |
 | sent on February 28, 2016 Pros: Resolution, and Firmware menu, shutter, snap. ISO management. Quality 'image and noise. Grana type film. Possibility 'of crop (crop). Metering (see also against), burst (considering the resolution). Customization improved dynamic range and recovery shadow compared to 5D3 Cons: ISO limitation to 12800 (could go further and think calmly up to 25600). - Spot metering only on the central (yet!) - Menu improved but still there are things improvable - Live View exposure simulation incorrect - Adjusting the color temperature liveview cumbersome - diffraction to very closed openings visible. Opinion: I waited a bit 'to write a review. In the end I was glad I purchased this camera. It 's not an "all around" but for some jobs and' excellent. Especially for architecture, studio, portraits, landscapes (with the limitation of a little 'diffraction beyond f / 11) and the discovery and' especially on the wildlife especially for birding, thanks to its great resolution and opportunity 'to crop. Noise and 'absolute minimum for such a camera and very well manageable in post. It 'a very fine sound and dry, similar to film grain. So you do not notice the volatile and retains detail, while the background you can 'safely use any noise reduction software with the usual techniques layers and layer masks. The very quiet shooting also greatly facilitates shooting from huts. The viewfinder and 'excellent, very good the new level in the viewfinder. Very convenient. It remains a very troublesome thing to have spot metering on the focus point. Truly a ostinazioCanon that it could make a difference in exposing properly and avoid recoveries in the shadows. Should if possible always expose to the right and then recover in post. However the machine holds up very well the shadows recovery. The machine 'absolutely usabilissima up to ISO 3200 (but not to resume very dark areas then they want to be pulling no stops). We speak of correct exposures and not cannate to show "how much and 'fig tree on my sensor." I recommend this machine to naturalists and portraitists. Truly a new world. |
 | sent on December 15, 2015 Pros: Files immense and rich in detail, color very natural, very quiet shooting Cons: Noise at high ISO that requires aperture lenses Opinion: I had about ten years starting from the various reflex canon 20d, for about three years I have 1dx 5dsr but surpasses them all with files three times larger than the 1dx and rich in detail, ability to have a crop Room 1, 3,1,6,1 1, very natural colors, possibility of automatic balancing environment on white, shot very quiet and delicate, in the viewfinder is in control, wanting to make a comparison with the automotive 1dx goes to 200 times under stress the 5dsr smoothly, effortlessly .... is a reflex that every photographer should have, a real pleasure to have in our hands |
| sent on September 08, 2015 Pros: Compared to 5 Classic you will see all 10 years of age difference. This, not so much for so many more features, but mainly for the image quality in every sense, clarity, color, noise other ISO.rnRispetto to 650 d ............ well, I would say it has the disadvantage that not you will never usare.rnIn the absolute value of the many megapixels is undoubtedly the greatest freedom to crop while maintaining a very good detail and nitidezza.rnInoltre renews your lenses, in the sense that both improves features even those not TOP, to make them accettabili.rnSe probably true that only a few lenses can make the most of the MPX 50, it is also true that brings out the best from lenses like the Canon 50 1.4, that the 5D Classic .. .insomma rnGrande thing .... 3 custom programs that can prepare you to be ready for different situations typical shooting. rnIl noise at high ISO will definitely greater than other machines but all is more than acceptable. Up to 3200 there is almost no problem. In 6400 it Depends on my mood, over no.rnHo also realized that with a very fast lens (1.2-1.4) you get much more and better than pushing the ISO beyond 3200.rnrnrn Cons: A fault, but because I am poor, I find the autofocus, when you leave him to decide on what points to focus, often wrong. Better to work with central or with the group of central and ricomporre.rn Opinion: Overall I'm glad I bought it and it seems to me that there is a chasm with the machines before. But beware, I come from a 5D Classic and perhaps those who come from a 5D3 not notice a qualitative leap so grande.rnIn last no evidence that the story can only be used with a tripod. Freehand, consistent with the light, the ISO and exposure times ,, is perfetta.rnLa management of images with my MacBook Pro screen retina and is not a problem, but I only work in JPEG (anathema ...) .rnPiuttosto to upload photos to Juza have to resize them. |
 | sent on June 15, 2015 Pros: Cool, much quieter than the 5D3 Cons: Mto slow to save images on sd Opinion: I had the opportunity to try this machine, and the same approach as the 5D3, if not for the fact that it is much quieter in the shot ... The files sn very sharp, but less than I expected. This probably is due to the fact that I tried it with 50l which does not shine in this respect and also in situations of low light and low contrast scenes ... The I still found it a great camera for those who like me does landscapes and portraits. Probably I will assess the acquisto.rnConcludo saying that although I have processed the files of a retina MacBook I noticed some difficulties in the management of such large images ... A tiff containing some level in ps exceeded anything like the gb |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
