RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Ale Sins
www.juzaphoto.com/p/AleSins



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Ale Sins


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

canon_70-210f4Canon EF 70-210mm f/4

Pros: zoom pump (for people like me is comfortable). rnusato economico.rnopzione "macro".

Cons: soft (very) wide open .. improves closing at f8. morbito to 210mm and with very little contrast. blurred nervous.

Opinion: target found in the house .. used in analog on an old SLR. is the only tele-zoom and for now I'll settle (I'll see if replacing it with a 135 f2 and / or 70-200 f4/2.8 and / or 300 f4 when I will understand what I need more). rnapprezzo zoom pump .. very fast (sin extends troppo.rnobiettivo cheap .. if inclined to use closed to f8, very soft at maximum aperture and maximum estensione.rnAF very indecisive and noisy.

sent on July 07, 2013


sigma_8-16Sigma 8-16mm f/4.5-5.6 DC HSM

Pros: 8mm on aps-c, clarity, body, flare, internal focus

Cons: certainly not bright, cartoon, Megillos sigma, only 16mm, no filters

Opinion: excellent lens. I can only quote the various reviews in the various reviews online. footer extreme WideZoom on the market (not the only 8mm fish, 12/13 equivalent) and is probably best for landscapes. very sharp, making test to different diaphragm loses One moment at room temperature, but it comes with no problems at f16. the body is solid, tough nuts to perfection (almost useless than the maf except in close-up), dimenisioni and optimal weight for aps-c and my hands, does not extend. I think stands up well to flare, especially in relation to the focal length and lens protruding. is not bright for indoor photos improvised, but exceptions better cmq a tripod. cartoon much to 8mm TA but I've always considered a characterization, partly because the edges are so 8mm strecciati (the effect may like it or not). dominant yellowish present, correctable in post, inconvenient for when you post-produce more pictures taken with canon and sigma goals together (laziness). to me in any case it did not bother and green landscapes liked the dominant. over time I've heard of limits coming only 16mm, 20 would be better but you can not have everything. not mount filters, a limit to who uses them and for those who would like to try them (one of the reasons why I'm selling), but it is actually on sale for planning a move to FF. Recommended! Absolutely yes (because there is no objective comparable in quality to FF)

sent on August 28, 2012




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me