RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Federico76
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Federico76



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Federico76


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

tamron_17-50Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD

Pros: Value for money, size and weight to be a constant 2.8, consistency and aesthetics rings

Cons: Distortion at 17mm, risolvenza maybe not excellent

Opinion: Very modestly I state that my review is not an expert. I'm happy with the purchase of this lens, when compared to the cost you absolutely can not have the right to complain. The main flaw I found is the barrel distortion at 17 mm, especially evident in photographs of architectural elements. I had the impression that the risolvenza is excellent. Excellent upgrade over traditional 18-55 kit lens, especially if you are looking for a basic zoom lens with constant aperture 2.8 (were my needs), without overloading the system. I have rather enjoyed a significant improvement in quality compared to the same kit lens in good light conditions. I really like the build quality and aesthetics: very solid rings, queers I've read around.

sent on November 12, 2016


samsung_nx3300Samsung NX3300

Pros: quality / price ratio, excellent resistance to high ISO up to 3200, portability, light weight, ideal for indoor or evening without flash

Cons: autofocus slow and sometimes impossible in low light, battery life compared SLR and compact

Opinion: I recently purchased this camera Samsung giving confidence to the Korean brand that could have chances to carve out market share in the segment. I chose it because I'm not convinced that the future is completely mirrorless APS-C, but may still be the prerogative of Reflex also: so I was seduced by the great price, saving something to invest in the next "flagship" (for my pocket) that will still Reflex. rnrnAbituato to my old Nikon D60 with sensor outdated are enthusiastic about the quality image and therefore the behavior of the sensor in low light. They are quite strict with noise and I assure you that up to 3200 ISO holds very well (I shot with the D60 not never more than 400). Moral: at night and indoors, if I intend to do without the flash, is my camera reference! Accustomed for years to Reflex I like less the consistency of the shot, the aim of the series is scarsuccio both appearance and for the autofocus, the battery lasts very lessthat the Nikon years old ... Better results with the tele 50-200 I purchased together. Do not wait to buy the 30 fixed to make the comparison ... (it has a cost which is also very interesting!)

sent on September 25, 2015




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me