|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gianluca Galloni www.juzaphoto.com/p/GianlucaGalloni  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro Pros: Image quality, lightness, robustness. Cons: Noisy AF Opinion: I took this used lens to try macros and portraits. Even if it does not originate to do the portraits, it does fine, the image quality is great. As for the macro, the quality is known, and I can do nothing but confirm it. I've read many reviews before I buy it and many complained about the focus; I tried it but I'm fine, sure it's not a splinter but so far it has not hit a blow yet, in the macro then I use the manual focus so the problem does not arise. sent on May 17, 2017 |
 | Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge Pros: image quality, AF, overall yield, ability to shoot in RAW Cons: Nobody for the moment Opinion: I switched to S7 Edge dall'S5 and the difference is quite known, as well as speed camera. I have always appreciated the surrender of Samsung and once again I was not disappointed: great colors and even in low light really good yield. The ability to shoot in RAW, and can control many parameters manually (even focus) I find it very convenient for those who want to take some pictures a bit 'more reasoned and not the usual point and shoot typical smartphone. Lastly is water resistant and even underwater up to 2m, it is certainly not an underwater camera but if necessary it can be useful sent on August 03, 2016 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 35mm f/2.4 AL Pros: Clarity, practicality, price Cons: Perhaps autofocus a bit 'noisy but eventually you get used to. Opinion: I got used to September I did not take a lot of photos but what I did I was enough to understand that it is a great goal: economic, light, crisp and compact. Obviously there is the limited version, but for people like me on a budget is perfect. The autofocus is a bit 'noisy but nothing serious. I would absolutely recommend. sent on January 03, 2016 |
 | Pentax K-5 Pros: Tropicalization, ergonomics, performance at high ISO, image quality, dynamic range ... Cons: For the time being detected Opinion: I have this camera for about a month and a half; I'm using it with an old Ricoh 50mm f2, manual, and I must say that I am really good: as ergonomics in my opinion is fantastic, lightweight yet durable, small (for its range) but it holds up well; as surrender I can not complain, on the contrary, the use primarily for portraits and night shots: the first is really practical, but above all on the landscape shows off its best side, I can reach well into 6400ISO with an acceptable noise and still correctable PP. the controls are simple and intuitive and I find comfortable double ring, which TAv mode is perfetta.rnNon I can only advise to all those who want, at a price all things considered modest, a reflex to the levels of a professional, and certainly the last two models released are also better rnAGGIORNAMENTO 28/06 / 2016rnDopo more than a year that the user can only confirm what I wrote, the very use in night shots and its yield at high ISO is incredible (to give you an idea, I took a picture at ISO 8000 to Andromeda and besides picking up the weak signal of the galaxy got a photo much cleaner than I expected). Definitely want good lenses to enforce the sensor but I'm working, the stabilizer in the room is comfortable and allows you to have any very well stabilized optical I must add; really excellent ergonomics and it is not heavy. The only flaw I found is that every so often a mistake to focus on in the evening, say around sunset, not quite in the dark, but I have never explained why since even more in the dark offers very good fire. sent on May 16, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
