|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
DottorD www.juzaphoto.com/p/DottorD  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 60mm f/2.8 DN Pros: sharpness, price, size Cons: only 2.8, unstabilized Opinion: I state that I also had the sony 50 1.8 oss and I will make a comparison with this Sigma Sigma 60 to 60. 2.8 has the same depth of field of 50 to 2.2 for sony Sigma The greatest value is a devastating sharpness at full aperture. bokeh is pleasant, the focus is fast and accurate. a6000 of the continuous fire works only at the points of the central zone. since I do mostly portraits, I preferred to sony for field angle away on APSC. very often people leave out the crop factor and I've found a lot nicer this equivalent 90mm, compared to the sony 50 which is equivalent to a 75mm (it will fish meat). I must say that sony has since its a really creamy bokeh, I have not found in Canon and Pentax. certain that costs much more than the latter two. has even more stabilizing than the Sigma, but I always use outdoors and is not a problem to have if you do video stabilization. in essence I preferred to keep the 60mm and 30mm sigma, for the fact that the focali 30 and 50 are close enough. sent on March 21, 2016 |
 | Sigma 30mm f/2.8 DN Pros: sharpness, weight, compactness, price Cons: only 2.8 Opinion: great lens, which takes home less than 200 € and is perfect as an all-rounder, with the angle of view equivalent to 45 ff. It gives excellent images already at full aperture. I was surprised by the excellent sharpness. very compact and light, good construction and a great value. the only flaw is that I would rather be f2, even less sharp, I would have preferred to have a more important focus, which still is not bad at 2.8. I can not recommend it, along with his brother 60mm. sent on March 21, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
