|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Alessandro '70 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Alessandro70  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm X-T100 Pros: good image quality - tilting screen Cons: Bad AF if not in optimal light conditions - focus peaking worse, useless - poor touch Opinion: Before I was satisfied with it, but after years it really tired me. Slow, low AF. all mediocre. NOT Xtrans PRO or CONS depending on taste. Just today I would have needed the focus peaking and I realize that it is a real crap, light years lower than a sony nex 5 that I had centuries ago. All medium = all useless, I would not recommend it if not for economic reasons (and it does not even cost so little) sent on December 16, 2021 |
 | Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact Pros: Speed and compactness - perfect Cons: heavy - not exceptional aesthetic Opinion: Simply perfect for those who love the small size without compromising operational power. It weighs a bit for size and aesthetically is not as original as the compact z3 had been. The Sony gallery is my absolute favorite. For me still the only compact solution, if it broke I would buy it again. Taken on ebay dual SIM by Italian seller at great price. For photos I do not know, point and shoot little, but it seems good. sent on December 19, 2019 |
 | Fujifilm XF 18-55 f/2.8-4R LM OIS Pros: Brightness-Construction-stabilization Cons: Distortion at 18mm-obnoxious lens hood Opinion: Sincerely reading rave reviews compared to the zoom kit, I expected that better: I just happened to use it often at 18mm and the distortion is noticeable, you want the correction in the car... and therefore the same defect of all the kit zooms. It remains beautiful and well built with stabilizer for me essential and brighter than the norm. The sharpness seems excellent, but, also put some problems of Fuji in the landscapes, I'm not easy to evaluate it for distant objects and all over the frame, I trust who says it is good. sent on July 29, 2018 |
 | Pentax K-S2 Pros: Size - Adjustable Display Stabilization Sensor Cons: Lacks the mirror up function - uncomfortable rear Cross Keys - Stagnation dell 'used market Opinion: One thing I really hate are the rear cross keys, the left in conflict with the display and still flat and hard to select the blind if not with the nail. Customizing improved dials. For the rest I confirm the previous reviews. The Pentax attack, stabilization and sound and visual confirmation in the viewfinder makes it excellent for use with slow, manual vintage even though the meter with these lenses only refers to the center point (I think) and is less reliable. Digital effects can also be applied to images already taken, the 'HDR is pretty horrible, but who can' pleasure ... I noticed an ease to burn the lights that improves with the correction that you can 'apply 200 iso on. The swiveling display is so comfortable that it would do no more 'to meno.rnIn practice I think is equivalent to other peer-end brands with the added stabilization and tropicalizzazione.rnA Unlike what is specified on the card, there is fine adjustment of' car focus. sent on July 21, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm X-T10 Pros: Aesthetics - sensor (?) - Built-in flash - Tilt display Cons: Sensor (?) - Autofocus not always accurate Opinion: Very nice and pleasing to the touch, reclining display, built-in flash, wi-fi function useful for remote shooting, I also like the shooting mode ring. DR and ISO auto and snaps smoothly. Electronic shutter can also be useful because it is quietly silent. They immediately notice all improvements over the X-E1, faster autofocus, but not always reliable even when hooked. A little uncomfortable the battery and card compartment that is in conflict with the tripod bracket that should be removed every time. With the X-t10 I decided for fuji and I'm investing in lenses though... However, the output of RAW raw files processed on some patterns like the foliage in the distance (poblema discussed and narrow-minded) is really bad and a The system that constrains you to look for, test, and spend for new software for me is unacceptable and I'm a bit regret not to have chosen at the time for sony a6000 and its lenses. sent on May 12, 2016 |
 | Fujifilm XF 27mm f/2.8 Pros: Dimensions-Aesthetics-quality Cons: Unstabilized-AF absolutely unreliable, especially at the side points. Opinion: Taken used for the X-E1. First impression: I won't break it down anymore! It should be sold in kits only for the size and aesthetics it gives to the machine. It will not be the excellence of Fuji lenses but among the best for generic use. The yield is comparable to that of the 18-55 XF, brighter at the same focal, the autofocus a bit noisier and maybe some fraction of a second slower from maximum to minimum excursion. Practically the same, but less precise. The aperture ring is not there, but, being however an electric command and not mechanical, for me that is on a ring or on a wheel is the same, even better if you earn the size. By trying it out I took pictures moves, my fault, but I put among the cons the lack of stabilization. Front cap with weak joint, uncomfortable. sent on March 02, 2016 |
 | Pentax SMC M 50mm f/1.7 Pros: bright - clear - beautiful colors and warm - all Cons: i dunno Opinion: Beautiful, sharp wide open, very clear just closes. Warm, inviting colors. I noticed that in certain occasion change the color temperature according to the 'opening becoming more' cold closing. Quality / price ratio monstrous, to buy immediatamente!............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... sent on January 22, 2015 |
 | Fujifilm XC 50-230mm f/4.5-6.7 OIS Pros: Excursion - Weight - Stabilizer - quality / price ratio Cons: Dark Dark Dark - Plastic Bayonet Opinion: I have recently, but it's hard to go wrong a photo. Good autofocus, sharpness and contrast. Excellent hiking and stabilizer. plastic material for me in this case is considered a PRO if you mount the X-E1 for low weight. Value for money unbeatable I think. For those who do not know: it lacks the aperture ring that have the XF-series lenses. The opening command has been moved on the wheel. sent on December 21, 2014 |
 | Canon PowerShot A720 IS Pros: all the pros of a copattina to keep in your pocket + macro function remarkable and good hiking side tele Cons: poor excursion wide side Opinion: Old, obsolete, but perhaps the best pictures in the end I made with this compact and not give up until they cease to function. lightweight, plasticky with the protection of 'objective self-closing throw it where you want. With the AA batteries universal never leaves you on foot. Good excursion zoom, not as wide, this is a bit 'a problem in abienti closed and tight. Excellent macro never moves. The network is also a sideware (hacked firmware that does not overlap the original firmware but it "joins") to put on the memory card that allows, among several other options, even shooting in RAW. sent on December 18, 2014 |
 | Sigma 19mm f/2.8 DN Pros: lightness - image quality - F2.8 - Lens Hood series Cons: I do not know Opinion: I have the previous version, with the knurled knob, for Sony NEX. Compact, lightweight, excellent image quality, no distortion. Great as to leave attached to the car for photos from all days of quality. Nell'astuccio black Sigma has also put the hood for a simple object and complete. As said for the 18-55mm sony, even if the card says "NO fulltime MF," setting the machine on focus hybrid between manual and automatic (on camera bodies where this is possible), the ring of focus is always active to fix the focus so full time. Straining can not find the "counter", perhaps the ring of focus in my copy is a bit 'leggerina and little braking. sent on December 18, 2013 |
 | Sony E 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Construction - stabilization - image quality Cons: Size - distortion at 18mm Opinion: For image quality is comparable to the 16-50 truck but it is a power zoom, I like more 'manual, even more cumbersome. The AF is fast (on NEX 5N improved after a firmware update), though often, when I was not in a position to ascertain the display, I found a photo with the subject not fuoco.rnNella card indicated above is "NO MF full time" , I do not know how to be a MF to be considered full time, but with the NEX 5N set in autofocus mode "hybrid" between manual and auto, the ring of focus can always be used to correct the focus and is a of the things I like best '. RNLA distortion at 18mm is remarkable, but given other tests of the minimum focal length zoom, maybe it's the norm and, as long as you have the correction in the room (only JPG), does not disturb' from time . Instead if it bothers always correct in photoshop. sent on December 18, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
