|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Medau.salvatore www.juzaphoto.com/p/Medau.salvatore  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 14-150mm f/4-5.6 II Pros: Practical, good quality up to 100mm, tropicalization, extremely low weight Cons: Poor brightness, lack of zoom block, slow autofocus, poor sharpness after 100mm and bad at 150mm. Opinion: I claim that I bought an Olympus E-M10 MarkII with the 14-150 to get rid of the heavy weight of the Canon 6D on my hiking trails from the neck, aware of the advantages and disadvantages of this machine and of this goal. Goal achieved?? I would say yes, the lens is light and in a long hike (7/8 hours) not particularly annoying, the quality found up to 100mm is more than acceptable and in good light conditions, as always happens in the outside, comes to have a very good quality and personally I was very pleased with it ... Then there are the limits that are not few, but I find them more than acceptable for the use I do. In low light conditions, even taking low ISOs, it knocks the image a bit, it suffers tremendously from the counter light, even if it behaves beniny with the warm lights of dawn and sunset, it suffers tremendously the flare so much that it has to avoid it accurately, walking so often, it often happens that the zoom gets annoying (buta mechanical lock) and when it comes to catching animals on the fly, moving, the autofocus is so slow that most of the time the animal has run away and you still have to shoot. Despite all its limitations, I like it, I'm more than happy and I could only change it with the 14-100 PRO but it costs exactly twice ... sent on October 17, 2017 |
 | Canon PowerShot SX60 HS Pros: Good quality up to 200 ISO, telephoto with good performance up to 300mm and in the limit of 400 ISO, lightness and maneuverability. Cons: Poor quality beyond 800 ISO, more than ridiculous than over 1000 ISO. In backlight conditions, the colors are blessed, and the zoom over 300mm completely blurs the image, so just make a small zoom on the monitor to see the tiled image. Opinion: Total disappointment. I'm sick of walking the Reflex for the mountains, I tried to take a compact that I had years ago to reduce weight on my broken neck, trusting in the improvement of technology and the fact that by shooting in RAW I could cover the little ones that safely I would have had. Let's say that under favorable conditions, the sun behind, with a light that lets you shoot at 100/200 ISO, the quality is more than discreet and you can get some good pictures, unfortunately not all days and not all Conditions you have this possibility and then the worst of this machine comes out and here Canon does not show much respect to its customers. A car that costs more than an average smartphone goes out and under certain conditions it does not even have the quality of the smartphome, which is added to the usual shameful habit of charging gold-priced accessories, see the hood and see battery of buffer stock. Morale, machine reported to the vendor and switch to a mirrorless Olympus. sent on August 08, 2017 |
 | Canon 7D Mark II Pros: Pros: Great manageability, very intuitive menu, excellent construction and very practical use. Cons: No end of problems, twice in Room Service for mirror replacement, AF dancer who leaves you in breeches of cloth at the climax, the image quality above 2500 ISO absolutely insufficient for a reflex of the genre. Opinion: A big disappointment. Used in a building, volleyball male and female, with good presence of the public, the AF system is fooled more often and while presenting the point of focus centered on the chosen subject, tends to focus on the subjects behind (public ) Countless unresolved problems in the first instance with mirror replacement in Room Service and partially solved with a second operation to another mirror replacement. Burst system suddenly loses focus and passes the first photo enough focus to others that are completely blurred. Read and reread, tried and tried all the various houses put on fire suggested, there is not one that is truly reliable. RAW files pretty good, but not great up to 2000 ISO it becomes almost indecent above 3500 ISO. rnDopo trying the 5D Mark III and 6D which is certainly not a sports car, I can say that the difference in quality with the 7D is abysmal, a calculated distance in light years, not to mention autofocus, nearly flawlessin 5D and 6D and absolutely deficient in the 7D. Rejection without appeal. sent on February 08, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
