|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Pixel www.juzaphoto.com/p/Pixel  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: It has a great value for money Cons: Focus slow, attack plastic and non-metallic Opinion: This lens is now in my possession for some time. was my second goal, after plasticotto. Has positive effect for its cost, because diaframmando some really sharp images are obtained. A f 1.8 is a little more "soft", but in any event, in extreme cases it is always better to have a diaphragm that allows you to shoot in low light. another flaw, is the fact of having the attack plastic. In addition to its focus leaves something to be desired, because of its slowness and its imprecision, especially when the light is not much. I highly recommend it for its image quality and brightness. sent on December 22, 2011 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: Fixed aperture of f/2.8, sharpness, very good resistance to flare, competitive price. Cons: AF a bit cumbersome, but still acceptable. Opinion: I bought this lens a little over 6 months ago. To the touch with a building a little plasticky but still sturdy and of good quality. The ring to zoom is smooth but a little duretta to turn (better, so at least it prevents the lens rotates on its own). As for the image quality that you can pull off with this goal, I can say that:-The sharpness: it is good to 35 mm. A 17mm and 50mm instead obviously lost a little. -The colors are good-has a flare resistance against the truly good. -Is a bright lens whose aperture can be opened up to 2.8. allows you to take in the most critical situations in which the light is not molta.l 'AF is fast enough. For the price and the quality he has, I find a really good goal. sent on December 06, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
