|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Emanuele77 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Emanuele77 |
Nikon AF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 D Pros: Best cheap handyman, small, light, good fuzzy, macro 1:2, focal length etc... Cons: Nobody Opinion: I use it very little because now I go out only with fixed, but every time I do not bring it a bit I regret, with my d750 gives me a remarkable focal excursion, a good blurry (9 blades of diaphragm), at 105 at full aperture makes good portraits, F8 is fine for close portraits, It holds very well the flare, if used by day or with good light and snaps from F 5.6 to close is very sharp. I had the 24 120 F4 VR, but this is more versatile in terms of creative possibilities, very little distorts, is lightweight and if you shoot with closed diaphragms There are no differences as to image quality. Now it is at ridiculous prices... If you need a totally do discrete from the excellent optical qualities and you do not need stabiliser and f 2.8 fixed take it on the fly! sent on November 11, 2018 |
Nikon AF-S 35mm f/1.8G Pros: Sharp already at f 1.8, weight/size, super sharp from F2. 8, excellent value for money (especially in used), Stella on the beautiful light points from F5 fantastic to F16, excellent resistance to flare. Cons: Fuzzy ugly, some dust comes in. Opinion: An excellent optics at a competitive price, very clear and versatile and light. Only flaws that I can find is a blur harder than the rival Sigma Art and chromatic aberrations a bit annoying (difficult to solve in PP). Some micro grain of internal dust inconsequential in the photos but annoying to see especially in a fixed. Closed from F 5.6 to F11 has an excellent resolve (it's the sharpest lens I've tried even better than the Sigma 150 OS). Star on the beautiful light spots in the landscapes at dusk. Excellent flare resistance without losing contrast (looks like a N series) on the used one located on the 300euro... Recommended! sent on September 24, 2018 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me