|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
0rs0 www.juzaphoto.com/p/0rs0  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 18-50mm f/2.8 DC DN Pros: Compact, lightweight, all-rounder, maf distance, speed Cons: Vignetting, vignetting, vignetting, vignetting, for some the zoom dial on the contrary can be a problem. Opinion: For what this toy costs they have made a half miracle. It depends on what you expect. Excellent usability, perfect for travel, reportage and much more. I used it on a whim even in a wedding in the most relaxed moments and it did not behave badly. Distortion in the norm to be a gem that is in the hand of a child, the sharpness I consider more than enough, it depends on what you use it for, however even in the portrait, between 40 and 50 mm it is not bad even at full aperture. The real problem is the vignetting between 18 and 24mm, horrendous and incorrigible. Practically a ring, an obscene stuff, never seen before. When you frame clear skies or scenes it is very evident. It disappears after f4. Clear that if you expect the performances of a 24-70 f2.8 for full frame we are quite far away. Overall he gets away with it. sent on June 10, 2023 |
 | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Weight, size, fast engine, price Cons: Vignetting, sharpness, unusual diameter of the filters. Opinion: The lens weighs very little and to keep mounted on the machine in general use should be just fine bene.rnNon wanting squeeze a little 'more the potential of macchina.rnLa distortion does not put you among the disadvantages, since if used diligently can give great shots creativi.rnLa vignetting is unforgivable. If the bright shots can easily be corrected when there is less light correction in post production creates digital noise and purple color at the edges scuri.rnIn terms of sharpness we not true that turning a bit 'the diaphragm improves definition, but they are often forced to increase the sharpness / clarity in post production to bring out the lines, especially if the light condition was not optimal during scatto.rnManca the lens hood. unusual diameter filters. I've assembled a 49mm adapter in sight of another lens luminoso.rnPer more than it costs to take it in kit is convenient, but take it specifically does not make sense. Save for a fisso quality and bright rather. Or a handyman with more excursion. sent on November 02, 2016 |
 | Sony A6000 Pros: Compactness, weight, picture quality, value for money, autofocus. Cons: Controls, high ISO performance, noise, requires high-level objectives, and only enough screen viewfinder, battery life. Opinion: I state that I am using from 2 months after using for years a Nikon D7000rnSono two different worlds, sometimes overlapping but not comparable not so much in performance as in the type of utilizzo.rnProvo to explain my impressions detailing the pros and contro.rnMolto compact, compared to a DSLR with kit lens you can comfortably put in a baby carrier and forget about her. This is the real advantage, combined with low weight, you can take comfort in every situation and it carries with incredible ease. My laps in the mountains or by bike are no longer an ordeal and traveling (by air) it can hold in a large pocket or a handbag microscopica.rnL'ergonomia perhaps is not the best if you have big hands, but not is my problem. The price is now adjusted to that which provides a system of this type. I find it impossible to pay a APSC over 1000 €. But it is my point of vista.rnL'autofocus was my real concern but until now I have never putcrisis. In low light, however, the performance declines, especially in precision. You can compensate by installing good optical light (and expensive) or at least going to manual focus, not for everyone and not for all situazioni.rnIl sensor is great, it allowed me to recover files from lights and shadows would otherwise be thrown away, RAW have a wide margin of processing and this is a big vantaggio.rnLa natural color rendering not my thing, but being very workable RAW you can squeeze bene.rnL'utilizzo is different from that to which it is of course with a reflex, not the 'I have never felt for action shots, concerts, photographic hunting and maybe I would not dream of farlo.rnParlando subjectively loses much of sense to use with heavy and bulky optics, altering both usability and functionality. Useless to have a body to 300g with a view mounted that weighs twice as much and cluttered almost as much a practical reflex.rnNell'uso the controls I found them a bit 'cumbersome, but customizingferrules and practicing with the functions that we need more, with two steps you get to do what you want. Of course do not expect the rate of use of a camera with LCD screen or a mirrorless with scales of nuts and obiettivo.rnUn big advantage is to be able to adapt optical vintage (manually) with the focus facilitated by the large focus peaking.rnDue flaws are the following. Being quite dense sensor, it requires high-level optics to make the most, negating the low initial cost. Another problem is that the sensor generates a lot of noise (when compared to the D7000) although on paper will say no. I do not understand if my copy, but already from 800 ISO under certain conditions pulls out a horrible digital noise. You can get around by mounting optical light, so you can maintain the ISO bassi.rnLa definition and screen brightness are really at the limit, the electronic viewfinder is rather bright but poorly defined. On balance issues they are unimportant. Alreadybeing able to see the result of the parameters (speed, aperture, ISO) set in real time are notevole.rnLa really poor battery life advantage, especially in the videos (I do not do), if you smanetta very course menu with drinks . If you have the habit of looking through the viewfinder and use the screen with care you will still arrive at a fair number of shots. Better to buy a spare battery anyway. sent on November 02, 2016 |
 | Tokina AT-X Pro 12-24mm f/4 DX Pros: Solid, smooth, pleasant colors and realistic, very good focal length range from landscape to street, the hood does his duty. Cons: Weight a little 'higher end, 77mm filters, mechanism AF / MF is not practical, a little hood' dancer but absolutely irrelevant, flare, dark. Opinion: The objective is convenient in terms of focal length range, the stabilizer is absent but useless these focal lengths. The colors are excellent. The focus is smooth and precisa.rnDipende always what you want to do, if you use it for internal (even in the dark) it takes the 11-16 F2.8.rnSoffre the flare but with some changes (and maybe a filter) can be limited, but there are aberrations delete PP is simplicity disarmante.rnCerto landscapes for those who, like me, take 650g rump in the long run you feel but you do get used to ... sent on April 29, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Light, crystal clear, bright, pretty cheap for the performance it offers. Cons: If you use only one fixed on APS-C is a little 'lungo.rnMinima distance of focus. Opinion: Purchase eccellente.rnLuminoso enough, I do not feel the need to have version F/1.4rnSfocato delizioso.rnNitido to be frightening, from 2 / 2.5 onwards excelled! RnLeggero, autofocus very preciso.rnrnCon APS-C is not suitable for enclosed spaces (need to be accompanied by another shorter). rnSe had even a distant macro capability would be the obietivo of life, but it is a reason ... rnIl hood is ugly? Just doing his duty ... and it does! RNLA aperture ring, although beautiful does not consider fundamental on modern machines ... rnrnConsigliato to ALL! sent on March 20, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Focal length (ie versatility), lightness, sharpness discreet. Cons: Construction, low light, Altina distortion at 18mm but manageable (disappears immediately stretched a little 'focus) Opinion: I came in with the car kit. The obietivo does his duty and is currently one of the few with an excursion really useful. Of course distorts a little 'and has a built a little' plasticky but if you are not matadors think we can do a lot to impress me tempo.rnNon colors and gives me a little 'discomfort distortion at 18mm, corrected for charity! RnIl VR helps a little, surely useful because the obligation is a bit 'dark and you have to stretch often times scatto.rnOttimo to travel and to take on a trip because it is not heavy and does what you need, if possible, to be completed with a true wide angle seen we're talking about APS-C.rnL 'autofocus is average. sent on March 20, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
