|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Paolo Roma www.juzaphoto.com/p/Paolo_Roma  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Panasonic FZ80 / FZ82 Pros: Like Mazariol. I add: remarkable minimum focal yield (equivalent 20 mm.), without significant barrel distortion. Cons: I subscribe to some of Mazariol's points: noise (too much, even given the size of the sensor), unentunating quality on pushed canvases, battery that drains early, dioptric adjustment dancer causes ring that flows too easily. I add: choice of image size too limited (18 /9 / 4.5 mp, without any intermediate value). Maximum iris closure at f. 8 Opinion: excellent to take with you on a trip or walk without commitment or particular photographic pretensions. It is advisable to use it on predetermined menu settings, not to be modified, because the menu is quite cumbersome and certainly plethora (too much stuff, very useless). Even with the known noise problems, out of 12 mpx it would certainly have produced good results but the manufacturer limits the choice between 18 (better to let go), 9 and less than 5. I'm using it in 9 format, that's fine. With 9 mpx and a good overall definition you get to the 20x30 or 24x30 without any particular problems. Optical quality does not make you cry out for the miracle (on prices of this level had, in my opinion, better optics the old Fuji bridges of economic range), with the canvas over 500-600 mm. (equivalents 35) decays significantly (also due, it seems to me, to autofocus that does not respond as to lower focal points). However, I was surprised by the supergrandangolo of 20 for the very poor barrel distortion (also contained the classic astigmatism), usually present at the short focal points of the bridges with strong excursion. Finally, I appreciate the good balance in hand and the good center of gravity: despite the low weight, shooting the machine moves little and does not unbalance to the right (as is usually the case with pressing on the shutter button). I find irritating the maximum closure of the diaphragm at 8, it could have been up to 11: you need to have an ND filter, if you do not always want to shoot on 1/250 (or on shorter times) I took it second hand, I paid very little, up to 400 iso on 9 megapixels it seems to me you can use it profitably. Shooting in raw, frankly, I don't even think about it (at least for now). I forgot: I did little rehearsal but I would say that 4K videos come pretty well. And as much as I paid for it, it largely justifies the purchase. sent on February 01, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
