|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
_hagar84xxx_ www.juzaphoto.com/p/_hagar84xxx_  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 1Ds Pros: viewfinder, ergonomics, file quality, The Camera That Killed Film, or so they say Cons: small screen, two-handed controls, limited burst Opinion: Premise: I was 18 years old when the first canon ff came out in the windows of photography stores and after exactly 20 years I found by chance an ad of a used with 14000 aesthetically perfect shots and I could not resist, in the coming days I will try it for good but from the first home tests I downloaded the files and a monitor my jaw came down, it's really amazing what canon managed to design with the technology of the time, I've never tried a flagship before, but I don't know if I'll be able to do without the form factor of the series 1. For those who want to try it I highly recommend it, but you should not expect to have a modern machine in your hands, but you have to approach it as you would do with a film camera, both because of the limited iso, the absence of the complex automatisms present today on SLRs (live view on all), the menu and the shooting settings to be decided a priori based on what you want to photograph (always and in any case to be modified using 2 hands and holding down 2 or even 3 buttons at the same time) and finally the slowness of the buffer that is similar to the progress time of the manual film (with the lever to be clear) Obviously I took into account that if something breaks I can only use it as a doorstop because I do not think it can be repaired, but at most I will have thrown 250 euros to feel like an 18-year-old once again, at least for the time it takes to click! sent on October 13, 2022 |
 | Canon EF 40mm f/2.8 STM Pros: Weight- Sharpness Cons: Slow-blurred AF slightly hard-lens stretching for focus, but space inside there's none Opinion: excellent lens for sharpness and contrast, very light and transportable to use for travel when you want excellent image quality. I found his only limit for portraits set to my daughter, since he started crawling he moves faster than the stm engine, so I decided to replace it with the 35is. The blurry at 2.8 is not really very pleasant, I find the one of 28 2.8 is more pleasant despite being much wider. When you focus endlessly the lens is at its minimum length, as you approach the lens comes out of the barrel and it's not very comfortable when you put the camera back in your bag, but the space of the barrel is so little that I don't think you could do otherwise. sent on March 04, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 L Macro IS USM Pros: material quality-stabilizer-sharpness-blurry excellent Cons: AF not very quick-lack tripod ring Opinion: excellent lens for macros and still life, but it defends well also for portraits, despite being only f2.8 has the advantage of the very close focus distance and unlike its counterpart f2 (which has 1 meter minimum focus distance) you can make a close-up even to children which is very useful in my opinion. Autofocus isn't as fast as non-macro USM targets, but I think it's normal, still nothing dramatic, stm do worse at speed. I also use it for landscapes on holiday and it has a micro contrast and detail to envy the 70-200. The only drawback is the lack of a tripod ring that is very useful for the macro, especially now that I use it with the rp (very small and light) with adapter and I have to buy it from third parties. It's my staple of the kit I started from, I would only trade it for 85 1.4 is L, but I should give up a lot of things and I would have a lot of doubts about it. sent on March 04, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 28mm f/2.8 IS USM Pros: Sharpening all over the frame, very fast AF, stabilizer, lightness, is very quiet Cons: lack of lampshed Opinion: Excellent light and very versatile lens, it does not present marked distortions as long as you do not make portraits in the foreground, but I do not think it is the use for which this lens was designed. Really good clarity on the whole frame already at f4, great for landscapes, street and travel reportage. It is easier to use than a 24 mm, but less than a 35mm fixed that makes you think of the shot and that takes you back a few years, when it was the most popular wide angle on film (there will be more than one why!). Without a lampshed I haven't had flare problems yet, but I think I'll buy it for the first trip I'll take. The stabilizer is really quiet compared to my 100L macro, but I think it's for the different amount of glass to stabilize. I recommend it to all those who prefer a quality fixed to a mediocre zoom even if equipped with the famous red line. sent on March 01, 2021 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Construction, weight and dimensions, internal zoom, flare resistance, excellent AF Cons: unsportsmanlike lampshed, decent sharpness from f8 onwards Opinion: thanks to the transition from aps-c to FF I had to reevaluate this goal, I used it with satisfaction as an excellent everything to do on the 50d, now on FF I can not find a right place, too wide for my photographic tastes and too soft on the sides at the wider openings, decent shots are brought home only if it closes at f8, so on FF it is no longer a whole do , but a very specialized optics and I am not a lover of landscapes, but more inclined to travel reportage I preferred to exchange it canon 28 2.8 is, a middle ground regarding the focal point much more useful for my purposes. sent on March 01, 2021 |
 | Canon EOS RP Pros: Cons: Opinion: sent on December 21, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
