|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Nth www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nth |
Nikon Df Pros: Compactness, maneuverability, ease of control settings, ISO Cons: As already osservatornL'impugnatura "edgy" has created problems for me during a very intense use! Opinion: It 's my third Nikon FX after D3 and D700 so I have these as a yardstick. I also tried the D800 because I do not hide that I was skeptical before spending a substantial figure but I chose Df frightened me because the 200 photos with 16gb storage and management of files on the PC over the yield of my lenses on a sensor 36mpx. rnHo fact involution in the search for a compact camera body more and more and more specific to my needs and after I "ruined" the neck in the mountains with the D3 I chose the D700 and so now I feel reborn! rnLo backpack is lightweight and allows me to enjoy more of the outputs and the quality of autofocus problem ripaga.rnil I can not find it in the sense that in normal use often recompose and in the landscape often use live view on a tripod exploiting the bubble Dual-axis integrata.rnHo read some inaccuracies on Dpreview that are incorrect or not I are in agreement: rn "Inconsistent use of materials detracts from sense of quality" rn "No stairs or exposure histogram in live view" is not correct, just press the info rea repeat pattern and appears as the bubble ... rn "Body is rather large and heavy, considering the small grip" I took pictures at the Geneva Motor Show for the whole day, over 1500 pictures ... the weight is minimal! the only drawback, but I have to make us the "callus":-D, is that the middle finger was so bent on the edge of the grip in the evening gave me a little 'annoyance, in two days everything was ok. This is the only real flaw but came out in a use is not usual! Rn "Slow AF in live view" no difference compared to other cameras I avutorn "No time-lapse option (available on D610)" absolutely false, and this extensively customizable! rn "No infrared remote trigger option" today with a affaretto wi-fi you can control the Df as the D3300 etc remotely with a smartphone enabling them to live view! rnDevo still be able to squeeze it well in the use of photography night to see the high ISO to "dirty" work but I'm sure I do not disappoint! rnL'autonomia is very good even if I do not understand why a battery is notccelsa as capacity. rnCon two batteries 1500 photographs I made using 28,300 and not skimping on zoom.rnrn sent on May 02, 2014 |
Nikon D90 Pros: ergonomics, compatibility with many optical shutter speed media processing RAW camera, live view valid Cons: honestly I have not found if not kept at high ISO Opinion: For me it is a great machine that I took and recommended because of a sense of solidity and compactness much greater at entry level and has great ergonomics almost at the level of pro. The main controls are in fact all on hand as the two adjusting rings, the upper display practical, easy to read, backlit. I also used the snow and the shooting conditions by pro without ever manifesting a problem and now I use it as a second body relying sull'autofocus in the car on comptibiltà then by all Nikon objectives and are not of those with motor of internal focus. sent on August 05, 2011 |
Nikon D300 Pros: quoto in toto those before me and add the interval that I find useful Cons: live view mode, battery life in standby and lack infrared sensor for remote control Opinion: in fact in the live view I noticed significant difference with the other body that I have is that the D90. In D90 while you wait for the autofocus works the image is clearly visible and the green square shows the focus occurred while the D300 does not have this certainty. I'm being keen time-lapse and they usually I am fine with the battery life (even raw + jpeg 1000 photos) when the impostto intervallomentro to schedule a sunrise I noticed that I can not trust to delegate to the D300 operability top to 4/5 hours regardless of the number of shots. sent on August 05, 2011 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me