RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Beppe Reda
www.juzaphoto.com/p/BeppeReda



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Beppe Reda


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

canon_17-35_f2-8lCanon EF 17-35mm f/2.8 L USM

Pros: Although it is out of production for quite some time, this lens has excellent mechanical construction and has a very solid, quality optics is excellent with a superb color rendering, hot as I like it, it is very resistant the flares and sharp even at the edges ... has fast and accurate AF and what not little cartoon absolutely not (in my esempleare in my possession) having read several times its characteristics in comparison with the new lenses Canon's latest generation and the costs incurred, I promised myself that would be the next purchase in the used market despite being outdated perspective, only for his goodness is hard to find anyone who wants to get rid of it. Bought for 500 euro, I think I have done a very good investment and I do not regret the absolutely new Canon EF 16-35 f / 2.8 L USM

Cons: I have not found anything special

Opinion: For me, even if it is a lens obsolete, is one of the best lenses in wide-angle camera kit in my possession, I searched long and finally I'm happy to own it. Its type lens hood screw even though skimpy, it is suitable to his work, when I have not used a lot, but in the pictures I did not know until now no problem of vignetting nor chromatic aberration in backlight and even fearful of flares almost absent in all lighting situations. In the landscapes stopped down to f / 4 or higher, has an incredible sharpness that can not even be compared to my Sigma 24-70 f / 2.8. For me it was one of my best investments, do not be impressed by his age, is an evergreen! the money you spend will be well spent in used, word of Liguria! ;)

sent on October 23, 2014


sigma_24-70_f2-8Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 EX DG HSM

Pros: Value for money excellent, solid and well built lens, light, fast and accurate AF and good resistance to flare .. tell me if it is short;)

Cons: Slight vignetting at wide open under certain conditions

Opinion: Before purchasing this light I wanted to compare it between the sisters of different brand, at the end were the pros outweigh the cons and so I bought it safe to have made a good investment. In my opinion this lens is a general purpose always bring back, is excellent both for night shooting in low-light conditions during the day, open to all works very well even though in some light conditions there is a slight vignetting which I think is negligible . Many complain because it is not Tropicalised but for me it is not a problem when it rains I'm home! :) I've often used for wide-field astrophotography and are more than satisfied. Finally, also the cost is not bad compared to the renowned Canon's I bought used here on the forum at a very reasonable price, on a whim I would like to replace it with a Canon lens with the same focal length L-series, but I prefer to comparison keep my Sigma seen that the defects set forth are less or equal than Canon, so why spendmuch more?

sent on September 20, 2014


manfrotto_055xprobManfrotto 055 X PROB

Pros: Very strong and very versatile

Cons: Weight, but around there is much worse

Opinion: Surely there will be around for the best, but the money has no equal. It certainly is not a feather, I brought a backpack with all my camera kit for comparable weight to that of a mountain in combat gear, but other than that I'm satisfied with my purchase. I use it to support the astroinseguitore iOptron Star Tracker along with the Manfrotto 498RC2 ball head, I can be more than satisfied with this set. If I were to change? I would try one of the lighter carbon fiber tripods to support equal weight.

sent on August 23, 2014


canon_85_f1-8Canon EF 85mm f/1.8 USM

Pros: Lightness, Sharpness, Brightness, Price, Performance

Cons: A fully open produces a bit of purple fringing, but it is solvable with processing with Photoshop

Opinion: I found that the EF 85 deserves to be among the lenses in Canon's higher-end despite being an f/1.8, I've also used for astrophotography all over the field surprised me for sharpness. In portraits with this lens, I got some good blurred that I can not even compare to my general purpose EX DG HSM Sigma 24-70 f/2.8, the AF works very well without ever wrong. Its sharpness ensures natural colors even in critical conditions of light, so it is for me one of the best lenses that Canon has pulled out ... I am very satisfied with this lens.

sent on May 11, 2013


kenko_2x_proKenko Pro 300 DGX 2.0x

Pros: Good value for money, lightweight, excellent clarity and sharpness wide open, no vignetting and chromatic aberration.

Cons: At the time I found no flaw for the use that I do, maybe I would have preferred the case cordura zipper as the Sigma 2X, this faux leather bag cheap I do not like.

Opinion: This 2X teleconverter Kenko Teleplus Pro 300 I was suggested by a friend photographer but I did not listen to him and I did my own thing. When I got to try it and compare it with my Sigma 2X I had to change my mind: in particular light conditions I find it more than 2X Sigma. Do not be fooled by the low price compared to the expensive and famous Canon teleconverter that gets along very well, I'm glad I bought it.

sent on May 01, 2013


samyang_14Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical

Pros: Strength, sharpness, brightness, low price

Cons: Vignetting evident at room temperature, distortion, inaccurate maf

Opinion: I bought this lens with scetticità even though the reviews were, despite some known flaws, very positive. In fact has a very good brightness and sharpness, especially in night shots and being very thorough, it is suitable for any field is to shoot the starry heavens as the Milky Way is in panoramic daylight, maintaining exceptional clarity in detail with diaphragms very open. It has electric servo mechanisms, but the settings of the rings are easily accessible, perhaps a little less of the ring aperture. The focused at infinity requires a little more care and precision but can be solved with Live View of the room. I am more than happy with our purchase, considering its quality / price ratio.

sent on October 21, 2012




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me