|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Marcop www.juzaphoto.com/p/Marcop  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Manfrotto zaino Off road 20L (MB OR-BP-20GY) Pros: Lightness, cured in details, good materials Cons: Questionable Price, impermeability even with the supplied cloth, it is advisable to buy an additional one. Opinion: A backpack suitable for day trips in the mountains. I opted for the 20L version compared to the 30 since the latter is much more cumbersome. The camera compartment can accommodate an APSC body with a handyman zoom lens plus a medium-sized tele. The compartment allows you to carry, alternatively, even a FF body, then slightly larger, with optical zoom but nothing more. In this case in the upper compartment I placed a small tele with case. The latter can contain over a small packed lunch all that can serve in the mountains for a daily exit; Vest, jacket, gloves, hat etc. The backpack is very comfortable during the trek and the weights are excellently distributed. Unfortunately high Price. sent on March 27, 2019 |
 | Pentax K-S1 Pros: Sharpness, very low noise, size, ergonomics. Cons: Lack upper display. Opinion: The thing I like most of the K-S1 is the size, it is very compact, with a pancake fits comfortably into the pocket of his jacket, and for people like me often go to the mountains this aspect should not be underestimated. Despite the size it holds well, but those with large hands may find some difficulty (the keys are very small). I enjoyed shooting the sharpness to high ISO (noise really content) and the colors that I found it very natural. From the aesthetic point of view it leaves a lot to be desired but the presence of the LEDs on the handle can be disconnected and therefore invisible. At the time I did not find any major problems even if I have to try it in depth. The price is very attractive. sent on August 18, 2015 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 16-45mm f/4 ED AL Pros: Lightweight, diaphragm f.4 constant image quality. Cons: Build quality is not the best, a few millimeters more on the canvas, slight distortion at the edges on the wide side. Opinion: A lens is no longer in the catalog, you will find on the used market at ridiculous prices (200 e.) And offers a lot in terms of image quality (better f.5,6-8 the diaphragm). Compared to optical most popular and expensive as the DA 17-70 or even the DA 16-50 (star) holds great comparison. A few millimeters more on the paintings did not hurt, they are often forced to change perspective to get to 60 or 70mm. Personally I still use it with great satisfaction. sent on November 20, 2014 |
 | Samsung Galaxy S4 Mini Pros: Very good quality / price ratio, lightness, fluidity, 4G, size. Cons: Camera Opinion: The quality of the phone is not discussed, it works perfectly with all the apps I downloaded. The fluidity of the system as well as the touch screen are excellent. What I appreciated most is the size, neither too large nor too small, you maneuver easily with one hand and placing it back in your pants pocket without any trouble. For those who are looking for a particular quality in the images taken with the camera of your phone (but this should be the camera :)) I highly recommend it. sent on November 13, 2014 |
 | Pentax FA* SMC 24mm f/2 Pros: Building a true star, excellent risolvenza and three-dimensionality 'of the image, resistance to flare and stunning maximum aperture of f2 Cons: The weight Opinion: The FA * 24 f.2-if and to the 'lens Pentax somewhat controversial at home ... personally I feel beautiful, and to f.2' can be used with good results but f.4 on it is really good .. . f.8 and to 'a knife. Convenient and amazing af internal resistance to flare. And 'now out of production for a few years but is on the used market at about 400-500 Euro. sent on February 23, 2014 |
 | Pentax SMC DA 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED WR Pros: Compact, lightweight, tropicalization, ability to change the MAF AF, price. Cons: Dim, poor quality at maximum aperture. Opinion: I recently purchased this lens that I use mainly in landscape photography, the quality leaves much to be desired wide open but when used with smaller apertures f.5 0.6 to 8, the results are more than acceptable. Its greatest value is given, however, low weight and compact size, this allows you to carry it everywhere with you. sent on April 03, 2012 |
 | Pentax K20D Pros: Ergonomic, sealing, long battery life thanks to the possibility to use two batteries (in the camera body and booster), strong body, excellent color rendering, stabilizer into the camera body. Cons: Over 800 iso noise is evident, slow burst. Opinion: The Pentax K20D SLR is a robust and very reliable, the advantage for me that I've always used Pentax, was to be able to use optical old production (FA or KA) on the K20D without losing any automation. The critical point is the noise at high ISO, forgivable when you consider that it is a reflex went into production in 2008, for the rest I think I will use the K20D still for some time. sent on April 02, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
