|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vocelibera87 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vocelibera87  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Small economic Slight Cons: Plasticky, Energivoro, soft in yield, slow to zommare, not lightning in focus, it struggles with little light, obviously rendered by "kit lens" Opinion: It is the kit lens of the Mirrorless a6000 series. As all photographically speaking kit lenses is base, you will get flat and fluffy images. And you do not have to wonder what longevity, my creaks already after 3 trips. But it is the most common lens on mirroless because:-they put it everywhere-has a focal range among the most useful for APCs (equivalent to 24 70 for full frame which is the most used zoom as all do for full frame)-because it costs little so even if it breaks or if you ruin Do not tear your hair-because it is lightweight and compact so you can put it anywhere you choose... but the question I would do is... it makes sense to spend €1500 of body machine to mount a €150 lens that returns results from compact?? ... sent on May 16, 2018 |
| Sony E PZ 16-50mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Small economic Slight Cons: Plasticky, Energivoro, soft in the yield at the corners, slow to zommare, not lightning in the focus with little light, made from "Kit lens" Opinion: is the kit lens of the Mirrorless a6000 series. As all photographically speaking kit lenses is base, you will get rather flat and fluffy images. And you do not have to wonder what longevity, my creaks already after 3 trips. But it is the most common lens on mirroless because:-has a focal range among the most useful for APCs (equivalent to 24 70 for full frame which is the most used zoom as all do for full frame)-because it costs little so even if it breaks or if you ruin you do not rip the Capel Li-Perche is lightweight and compact so you can take it anywhere sent on May 16, 2018 |
 | Sony E PZ 18-105mm f/4 G OSS Pros: Constant F4 opening Cons: Heavy and chunky on a6500, zoom and lens focus, lack of immediacy in the use of ring nuts Opinion: I come from a Canon 6d with professional lenses 70 200 2.8 II and maybe I expected a bit too much from this lens. -Slow and awkward in focus-unbalances forward the a6500 fatigue of much the grip (so not suitable for travel and street)-heavy bulky and cumbersome which makes me miss the main reason of the a6500, travel light-power zoom slow and mechanical , not usable for professional videos. -All Sony lenses are electronic and non-mechanical zoom (as on Canon and Nikon) This brings some advantages (zoom and autofocus for more delicate videos and theoretically less weight and smaller size.. Although it is not always so just see Sony GM line lenses that are big and weigh as if not more than the respective for SLR) but also the big drawback as on this lens that does not have the immediacy I had on my Canon lenses to "mechanical" zoom-quality Medium low, I don't see shocking differences with the 16-50 Kit returned to the seller sent on May 16, 2018 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
