|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ellezeta www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ellezeta  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 100-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: Value for money, weight, sharpness, control of chromatic aberrations and parasitic light, stabilization. Cons: AF hooking on moving subjects, lack of tropicalization. Opinion: I've had this lens for about two years and I've paired it first with a Nikon d3200 and then the d500. I would say I'm really pleased: we're on another planet compared to the Tamron 70-300 and, at least on APSC, it's not far from the originals. The bracket is not included, but can be found by third parties at reasonable prices. The construction, although made of plastic, is very good, especially considering the price (the Canon 100-400 costs about twice as much), and the weight is very low. Also good control of the chromatic aberrations and flare, the stabilization is really good, as well as the sharpness. As for autofocus, on the other hand, it sometimes struggles to hook on moving subjects, this is perhaps the only limit of the goal, besides the fact that it is not tropicalized. So, by drawing the sums, my vote for this lens is 9.5 out of 10. I highly recommend it for wildlife and bird photography, mating with APSC bodies, especially for those on a fairly low budget. sent on July 11, 2020 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
