|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fraever www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fraever  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 105mm f/2.8 Macro DG OS HSM Pros: Also sharp on aps-c (especially f/8 to f/11). Very good quality stabilizer (on aps-c with a little luck you can reach sharp photos up to 1s of exposure). Soft focus ring. Made of plastic but very robust Cons: Sometimes it does not find fire if the subject is close but more distant than 0.42m. Noisy stabilizer. On nikon you get f/2.8 only by focusing towards infinity, the closer the fire is, the closer the diaphragm closes until you get to f/5.6. Soft at f2.8 (already at f4 you can see an excellent sharpness). The buttons are a bit hard. Focus breathing can make composition difficult. The focus ring is inverted compared to nikon obbietives, you have to make us the abiudine. Not tropicalized Opinion: Well what to say, I think for 400 euros it's a good purchase, although the diaphragm that closes with focus can be occasionally frustrating sent on February 20, 2021 |
 | Pentax SMC Super Takumar 135mm f/2.5 Pros: Blurred, soft, solid and well constructed, little vignetting and distortion. Diaphragm ring on the lens Cons: Light chromatic aberration on the focus focus (red) and back focus (green) autofocus Opinion: I would like to point out before starting, that because of lack of adapter I used this lens by holding it by hand. The 135mm is a solid, well-built lens, the focus ring is precise and soft. Despite having tried it by hand on my nikon d3300, I was amazed. Excellent optical construction that leaves no room for vignetting (even to ta) and distortion. The bokeh is great, very soft and pleasant to see. The only defects I have found are the chromatic aberration on the front focus and the back focus, but nothing so serious, considering it's a 1970's optics. If we just want to do the pins, I find the least focusing distance (1 , 5 meters), but nothing that can not be remedied with a couple of extension tubes and no autofocus. But trust yourself, when you start using this great look, you will not feel the lack of autofocus. Finally, (I do not know if it's a problem) I find it is not very clear, but considering it used my grandfather (many years ago) on herPentax film, I do not complain. Pentax 135mm f2.5 gauge (bayonet) sent on August 18, 2017 |
 | Nikon D3300 Pros: Low price, intuitive, durable, lightweight battery Cons: Few focus points, raw compressed, multiplier compatibility and extension tubes, does not have an internal AF engine, does not support macro calibration of targets AF Opinion: Surely it's a great car to get started, with its 24MP (6000x4000) sensor capable of taking images up to 3200 iso, instead of "clean" images you can have up to 800 iso. Not having the anti-aliasing filter the images are sharp and contrasting. Unfortunately, after 1 year of use, the shutter button sometimes does not work and if you want to add old multipliers or extension tubes without pin, you will find yourself in a manual without an exposure meter. At shutter speeds it is good to be a reflex entry level, although the 11 focus points are few and in poor lighting conditions make it difficult. Ergonomics are more than good, even for those with big hands, will always ensure good grip. Battery lasts about half day and little more than continuous use sent on July 19, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
