|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Corry86 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Corry86  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon EOS RP Pros: All Cons: C log absent Opinion: I shot with various cameras: Sony, Fuji etc. and there is no ideal camera. Every current camera has strengths and weaknesses. This camera is perfect and is the most "sensible" choice for amateurs and pros who only take street-portraits. I only use fixed RF lenses and the weight is equivalent to that of a compact. It is a pleasure to carry it everywhere and take pictures. The quality is undisputed, the full frame sensor compared to that of Fuji is better in depth of field but it is not a portent at very high iso. RP is an honest machine, at a bargain price with an immense optical park (rf-ef). With fixed RF lenses that are relatively cheap the quality is very high, the colors are also good. The colors without any modification are neutral and do not regret the colors of Fuji. It is the obvious choice for those who only take photos (certain genres) and are not a video-maker. sent on January 13, 2023 |
 | Sony A7 II Pros: Full economic frame. You can mount all the lenses around, good dynamic range. Cons: Color palette. Mandatory post-production. Opinion: The Sony a7ii is my main machine; for my genre and street photos is also quite advanced. The difference then always makes the photographer. As for the colors I absolutely agree with the user Antonio Ibraimovic. The transition from Fuji xpro1 , xt10, xt100 was quite traumatic in terms of colors. The dynamic range is good, even sharpness, the problem is the original palette; the tones of the complexion are really bad - always tending to straw yellow even when the machine has the correct white balance. If you want to buy this machine on the used market even just to use it with vintage optics you have to buy an Xrite colorchecker as well. With color calibration the situation improves and with the use of the Lumariver program, intervening on the dynamic range the results are good. I have created a neutral profile and the color palette is now very close to the colors of Fuji which, in my opinion, remain the best machines around for portability, lenses, colors and file quality. sent on January 23, 2021 |
 | Sony FE 28-70mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS Pros: Autofocus Cons: All Opinion: An indecent target. Corners few sharp at all openings, is quietly surpassed by vintage optics that cost very little. Useful perhaps to take souvenir photos without bokeh... unfortunately it's not even sharp even at f8. A bottle bottom. It makes little sense to put such a lens on expensive, state-of-the-art full-frame machines. sent on September 14, 2020 |
 | Fujifilm X-T100 Pros: price, 24mpx, High ISO hold, photo quality, ability to use FX lenses, high quality overhead screen, 91 point autofocus, OLED electronic viewfinder, aesthetics. Cons: Continuous shots up to 6fps-4k Video. Opinion: This art-built camera for the public "consumer" offers many features at a very low price and certainly reserve some surprises. The high ISO seal is comparable to that of the machines using the Xtrans matrix; You notice the noise and a small decay of the dynamic range after the 6400 Iso. The colors are faithful; There is the possibility to use almost all the film profiles of Fuji. The tilting screen and the OLED viewfinder are of very high quality, the same used in the most expensive models. I found the lightmeter of the Machine a bomb; If you shoot in manual the photos always come out properly exposed and it is unnecessary therefore every correction in Lightroom; However if you lighten the shadows does not appear noise. For those who do not use the raw, the quality of JPEG is really beyond the excellent with the possibility of making corrections and recoverers important in Post. For those like me comes from xe1 and machines of the old generation Fuji certainly you can notice a noticeable increase in sharpness. 24MPX give the possibility to make large cuttings and prints. For those who shoot in manual the function of focus peaking is very useful. The autofocus is good enough, I do not think however that this machine can be used for action photos, 6 fps are FEW. Recommended to those who already owns FX optics and wants a body on super-technological budget and step with the times with which to have Fun. Good for portraits, landscape and Street. I've never used video machines, so I can't make judgements on this aspect. I think all the Fuji bodies are only suitable for taking Pictures. With Iridient x transformer the RAF improve considerably while not being an Xtrans machine. sent on October 10, 2018 |
 | Yashica ML 50mm f/1.7 Pros: sharpness, price, on an APSC becomes a portrait lens. Cons: Lack of Contrast. Opinion: A good lens; Certainly the comparison with modern optics does not stand because it lacks contrast but with a bit of post production Improves. Its strong point is certainly the sharpness: it is super sharp even at full aperture. On an aps-c lends itself to being a good portrait lens. Recommended for beginners and those with a very limited budget. Little expense so much surrender. sent on October 10, 2018 |
 | Nikon 24mm f/2.8 AI Pros: Color-tint-sharpness-excellent management of distortion, flare and aberrations. Cons: It is sold to crazy figures at various online markets. Opinion: I bought this lens and on my Fuji it becomes a 35 mm; Right focal for street. Compared to all the other lenses that I own can return very nice colors. The colors are quite saturated enough and realistic, so much that you do not need any retouching in post production. Superlative sharpness, even at full aperture you can pull out something good, at F8 becomes a blade; At more closed openings the details are clearly visible and the yield is comparable to that of zooms and modern lenses. The distortion is very good, there is no need to hack that much to make corrections in post. A lens that can be well used with mirrorless even today and alongside modern optics does not disfigure at all. When used in favorable light conditions and apply brightness masks in Photoshop is able to pull out really remarkable shots. If you get the chance to find it at an acceptable price, take it. sent on September 21, 2018 |
 | Apple iPhone 7 Plus Pros: Camera-processor - video4k-ios - apple store and vast vastness of app. Cons: high price . 720p screen resolution of the basic version. Opinion: One of the best smartphones that is now in circulation. RnPart from the processor: no longer dual core, but quad core: the speed is impressive; You can do everything fast, the word "crash" does not seem to exist in the dictionary of this version of Iphone. From the fast editing app to the heaviest games, everything is handled excellently. But as always, it's easy and intuitive, I hope Version 11 can make the system more upgrades. As far as the camera is concerned, we can say that with this model the nokia has finally been put on! Rn The camera guarantees diaphragm apertures below 2.0, portraits are therefore pleasing to see, it is also possible to shoot well at tall Iso . The 4k videos are spectacular, but you need to have a decent pc with a minimum i5 processor to think of editing. The screen of the smartphone's netbook is the best ever of ever. The colors are realistic; Also the brightness% 26agrave; it's good. If we really want to find the hair in the egg, apple should raise the screen resolution of the basic version and abolish the 1080p resolution in the plus. One plus I think it might very well have a screen with a resolution of 2k. Rn For the rest I think this smartphone has absolutely no rivals. sent on August 08, 2017 |
 | Nokia Lumia 1020 Pros: Camera. Video quality Cons: all the rest. Opinion: I probably caught the "defect" piece. For me this phone was a nightmare. The camera is very good; In fact it's like having a compact of always the highest quality in your pocket. The quality of the photos is decent but not comparable to that of a reflex or mirrorless even a few megapixels vintage. RnQuello I ask nokia is: what is the point put a super pussy phone over a phone with a very limited operating system? You get cut off completely because this model does not support the latest version of windows phone, many new app sharing apps can not be installed .rnNot there are also valid photo-editing fast app stores. I do not even recommend it as a second phone to use just for shots when you are traveling or are jumping because it's a titanic business to take photos from phone to pc. My PCs after a very short time have not recognized the cellphone; This was also the caseU notebook of relatives and friends. RnIn the operating system also pick up an update is almost like asking for a pope hearing. Bokciatissimo. sent on August 04, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
