|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Diegoz www.juzaphoto.com/p/Diegoz  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD Pros: Light, tropicalized, well built, optically valid, excellent value for money. Cons: fine detail loss to 300mm in some cases Opinion: I just got out for sony E this lens and I had a great time but I didn't get to test it too much as it was just a test before taking the 200-600 sony. Currently I have the version for Nikon Z that is performancefully identical to the other mount but that in addition 'has the usb-c input for any updates (so without the aid of a docking or without performing the update as for sony grafted on the camera body ... with any risks that could be taken). In this period where if you want these focal lengths on nikon z you have only this choice or resort to the accrocco of the ftz with a 70-300 nikon F ... I think we can be more than satisfied. This lens responds well to af, and 'light, and' tropicalized and also at a constructive level, despite being in polycarbonate, it seems stable and well assembled. The optical part does not suffer particularly from aberrations and flare but it must be said that if at 300mm you try to get the greatest reproduction ratio, often the details are kneaded: better to move away a little and crop or shoot at less than 300mm. It should also be said that it is a lens that you take home on offer at 470 euros ..... What more could you ask for? Perhaps a more "macro/closeup" reproduction ratio like the "brothers" 20,24 and 35? (which I remember being of the same line and above all the same diameter 67mm). Nikon has already 'rebadged 2 tamron's lenses(28-75 and 70-180) but this 70-300 no(maybe the nikon z will come out?) and since the nikkor 180-600 is now reality.... Dear Tamron, why don't you adjust the 150-500 also for nikon Z? (since you produce it for Sony and even Fuji??) sent on June 27, 2023 |
 | Sony FE 24-70mm f/4 ZA OSS Vario Tessar T* Pros: Lightness, colors, speed 'af, sharpness to TA (at least of my specimen combined with the A7IV), tropicalization, stabilization, f4 fixed ... lens hood..... Cons: for the price it is used I do not see cons Opinion: Reading the last 10 opinions I feel like going against the tide.... we complain about the sharpness to the minimum.... even "indecent" at full aperture and I think that maybe I'm the only lucky one who has had this lens for 2 times in 5 years and on the contrary I have always appreciated the sharpness "right" especially for portraits (which is fine) where at 70mm and TA also has a blur / bokeh very pleasant .... So much so that you forget that it is an F4. Especially in the shots I take at night portraying buildings and various architectures "freehand" even enlarging to 100% I always find well-defined lines and never unclear .... But then enlarge to 100% 33mpxl what's the use? If you print A3 or A4 then ..... (ah now you do not print more' ok ..... click to enlarge) In terms of quality, the lens has an exceptional flare resistance (even in strong backlight)... I have never found chromatic aberrations beyond the tolerance threshold (however in case they are corrected) and the three-dimensional detachment of the planes is in some cases indistinguishable from a fixed. Used in the past with A7II and A7III and now on A7IV and it seems to me that with this is even more "solving"... in short, a combination that I recommend. Oh... we are talking about a lens that you buy at 350 euros used in excellent condition and therefore I am certainly not here to say that it is better than GMs or fixed .... we would miss it.... But 'the results are slow "good" and not bottom of the bottle as I have practically read on many reviews. So the right lens for me to take with me for excursions and trips out of town ... standard focal lengths that are always good .... even when it rains! sent on May 05, 2023 |
 | Fujifilm X-H2 Pros: Ergonomics, buffer, dual CF / SD slots, viewfinder, articulated screen, video resolution, iso considering the sensor (see also in the cons), significantly improved autofocus, colors, dynamic range, battery life. Cons: I don't feel like I've found any other than things you know when you take an APSC with 40mpxl.. Maybe I would have kept at least the exposure compensation ring and the "classic, fast and intuitive" focus mode selector. Opinion: Taken in combination with 16-80 and 100-400 to have a "basic" kit for travel reportage and above all nature photography and birdlife. The af is on another planet than the previous fuji and I say this with extreme conviction having owned practically all the xtXX and xtX. I imagine and hope that fuji will want to further improve AF performance (which in some few cases are not "very precise") with the next firmware... but for now nothing so 'serious ... We are on very low "error" percentages and after two months of use I can say that I have understood the occasions when the AF makes mistakes and therefore where to intervene to change the mode and the result is always very satisfactory. In my opinion and 'more' suitable this for the photo nature and birdlife that the xh2s ... that will have better AF performance (but not too much) but does not allow you to use the crop "in complete safety" as you can do with this camera that, at the same time, also allows you bursts of all respect and unthinkable a few years ago even on top-of-the-range models in the world of SLRs. In the hand it looks like a weapon for how solid it is and gives its own sense of something durable and resistant .... something that I have never encountered in any other mirrorless tried, had or even just handled. In short, for me the h2s is the REAL allround of Fujifilm ... No castration as in XT5... all at the top (in its category) At the video level I got really exceptional results with a good stabilization (not excellent ...) even at 400mm freehand. Combined with the 100-400 you go around with a lens f5.6 a TA and 600mm equivalent... multipliable without loss of detail for only "100 gr" more.... For everything else there is an entire fuji optical park to meet every need... Not to mention the third-party lenses that on this machine seem in some cases to go better than the "original" ones ..... in short, and 'all yet to be discovered .... But if this is the road Fuji has taken.... well... it really hit the mark! sent on December 18, 2022 |
 | Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 Pros: Sharpness, construction, tropicalized, hood, unparalleled price quality, color rendering, weight, absence of aberrations and excellent resistance to flare, distorts almost nothing. Cons: Af noisy and slow (but not too much) even if it improves a lot with the firmware version 3 ..list other features related to the low price is useless. Opinion: I state that I have tried and used another 35 2.8 including the samyang and the Zeiss (which costs almost triple) and I can say that for a little less or a little more than 200 euros (depending on the period and the offer) you take home a lens "beautiful to see" with a nice diameter filters ... Lightweight... bright enough to have excellent blurred and take night photos, especially if you have cameras like the a7III / a7c or the a7IV. A lens that does not suffer in particular from anything neither in backlight nor at the level of chromatic aberrations. Very sharp on the whole frame already at full aperture but from f4 onwards it becomes almost incredible for a lens of this price range. Compared to samyang we are on another planet.... compared to the zeiss.... perhaps a less particular rendering of the colors that are still good and quite neutral (which for me is an advantage) and obviously size and AF play in favor of the Zeiss .... but is it worth all the price difference? I would say no.... maybe the "zeiss" badge actually makes a scene but the photos speak. Brava tamron... you are doing great things for Sony and I say this as a former owner of the 24 (excellent too). I just don't understand why they created this strange trio 20-24-35 and not a 50..... sent on August 23, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm X-T20 Pros: Iso, 4k video, simulation films, black and white fantastic, af which is fine as well to almost dark .... fast .... Cons: for now nothing .... maybe 'too much to ask but .... not' mind the very useful internal stabilization with vintage optic .... but details are sometimes negligible! Opinion: taken yesterday coming from a full frame Nikon d600 .... after several tests under pressure does not make me regret all the former reflex.rnPosso say that the feel that transmits and 'very similar if not identical to my former Oly EM10 mk2 ... .but it does its work smoothly and files are exceptional also because 'performance is clearly superior and then this and' a aps-c .... the ISO seal and 'fantastic .... a real step forward ... even for those who want to try their hand in the video ... with 4k rnPer me .... I did not know fuji .... simulation of historical films is proving a real sorpresa.rnrnPer now I'm with the optical kit and then the try 'with vintage lenses that I just I get the adapter .... but do not rule out a future purchase of a 55-200 .... rnrn sent on February 28, 2017 |
 | Nikon AF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 D Pros: focal handyman excursion, very credible macro function, robust construction and excellent quality, sharpness and excellent behavior of FX 24mpxl, value for 'unbeatable price. Cons: macro button to turn it off you have to do some 'type of operations put in MF and restore manually dial all the way .... for what it is the price I do not find fault ... and I'm not here to say that' dark ... 'cause you can not' expect more '. Opinion: I bought this lens today after reading the great reviews in riguardo.L'ho chosen primarily for its macro function since often when I'm around to snap feel the need 'to make this type of shots ... so considering the' zoom range fairly standard and that little bit more 'that I 105mm compared to 80 or 70 ... was for me the best compromise which then combine directly tele.rnLa an excellent choice for those with FF and maybe can not spend a lot for a lens PRO-level ..... although to be honest .... the overall yield of this, coupled with excellent FX sensor (in my case the d600) reveals pleasant sorprese.rnripeto for little more 'than 100 € I doubt you can find a meglio.rnMi still intend to review it again as soon as I learn how 'to know meglio.rn sent on October 10, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
