JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.

OK, I confirm

You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept Cookies

Customize

Refuse Cookies

Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 : Specifications and Opinions

The Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 is a wide-angle lens for FF and APS-C, manufactured from 2019. The focus is done by Stepper Motor, it does not have image stabilization. The average price, when it has been added to the JuzaPhoto database, is 224 €;

17 users have given it an average vote of 9.6 out of 10.

MOUNT

This lens is available with the following mounts:

Sony E: this lens is compatible with mirrorless fullframe and APS-C Sony.

Specifications
Focal lenght	35 mm
Angle of view	63.4°
Format	FF, APS-C
Max. aperture	f/2.8
Aperture blades	7
Lenses/Groups	9 elements in 8 groups
Min. focus distance	0.15 meters
Reproduction ratio	0.50x
Features
Stabilization	No
Focus	Stepper Motor
Internal Focus	Yes
Built and notes
Tripod ring	No
Extenders	No
Filters	67 mm
Lens hood	Yes, supplied
Weather sealing	Yes
Weight	210 g
Dimensions	73 x 64 mm
Buy
Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2, buy on Ebay JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Do you want add your opinion? You do it by joining JuzaPhoto, it is easy and free!

There is more: by registering you can create your personal page, publish photos, receive comments, join discussions and you can use all the features of JuzaPhoto. With more than 251000 members, there is space for everyone, from the beginner to the professional.

The following opinions have been automatically translated with Google Translate.

Riproviamovà

sent on April 25, 2024

Pros: Smoothness, sharpness, color neutrality

Cons: maybe the TAMRON quality control because the AF is a clear design choice

Opinion: Feeling: lens of the digital age, you already know, and for this reason sharp and perhaps a little anonymous in the rendering but no problem on the contrary, it leaves a certain margin of customization in post. We already know that auto-focus is what it is, but it couldn't be otherwise on a similar body and costing 200 euros. If anything, the praise for its real usability goes to the designers who have guaranteed a cost/performance balance to the clear advantage of the latter. In short, it is clear what you buy a similar lens for and I must say that in AF-C on SONY A7 IV it did not have the same responsiveness as a native Sony, such as the 40mm f2.5 or the 24-105 f.4, but it did not miss a shot either. On the other hand, it is likely that from one specimen to another there may be a certain difference in AF performance in low light (this happened to me with a friend's 35). It is also true that it seems to have a toy in your hand because of the low weight, but then when you hold it on for a whole day, your hands and back thank you. Ultimately, a working tool with which one is forced to abandon one's fetishism for the object (I confess that I also struggle a certain amount because the eye also wants its part) but which knows how to repay in terms of quality with the right compromises, never invasive. I want to close with two adjectives: HONEST and DIGNIFIED but I would be unfair because it knows how to go further. For me it's 9.5 full. I wouldn't use it for video but maybe it's superfluous to mention it.

Enrico_G

sent on January 31, 2023

Pros: Image quality, weight/size, tropicalization

Cons: MAF (read below)

Opinion: Therefore, before expressing myself I must remember the price of this contained perspective and what I write will be all to be interpreted in relation to this. Now I can get started. Let's start with the image quality: spectacular. Color rendering in line with that of all Tamron lenses but, guys, the sharpness is magnificent. I did not perceive aberrations and the distortion is minimal. It seems to me to have an excellent resistance to flare, but here I could not say for sure since I always have the hood mounted. It's light, but it gave me a nice sense of solidity. Fluid bezel, although I don't really like the focus by wire (ie electronic and not mechanical). Now, the MAF, let's talk about it: it is quite noisy, but in terms of speed, it will not be a splinter is true, but objectively it is faster than the various comments and reviews appear and I was incredibly surprised (also tried with Megadap ETZ21 on Nikon Z6 and Z6II, it goes great). Net of everything, with little you bring home a fun lens, with a high level image quality, a tropicalized body and a MAF fast enough to do almost everything, so I would strongly recommend it.

Diegoz

sent on August 23, 2022

Pros: Sharpness, construction, tropicalized, hood, unparalleled price quality, color rendering, weight, absence of aberrations and excellent resistance to flare, distorts almost nothing.

Cons: Af noisy and slow (but not too much) even if it improves a lot with the firmware version 3 ..list other features related to the low price is useless.

Opinion: I state that I have tried and used another 35 2.8 including the samyang and the Zeiss (which costs almost triple) and I can say that for a little less or a little more than 200 euros (depending on the period and the offer) you take home a lens "beautiful to see" with a nice diameter filters ... Lightweight... bright enough to have excellent blurred and take night photos, especially if you have cameras like the a7III / a7c or the a7IV. A lens that does not suffer in particular from anything neither in backlight nor at the level of chromatic aberrations. Very sharp on the whole frame already at full aperture but from f4 onwards it becomes almost incredible for a lens of this price range. Compared to samyang we are on another planet.... compared to the zeiss.... perhaps a less particular rendering of the colors that are still good and quite neutral (which for me is an advantage) and obviously size and AF play in favor of the Zeiss .... but is it worth all the price difference? I would say no.... maybe the "zeiss" badge actually makes a scene but the photos speak. Brava tamron... you are doing great things for Sony and I say this as a former owner of the 24 (excellent too). I just don't understand why they created this strange trio 20-24-35 and not a 50.....

Marco Palomar

sent on December 24, 2021

Pros: sharpness, lightness, colors, reliability, ac correction, cost, modern rendering

Cons: focus by wire and therefore AF, larger footprint than competitors, modern rendering

Opinion: I have been using this tamron with satisfaction for three weeks, alongside the older brother tamron 35 SP 1.8 in sony A frame with adapter. It is clearly a modern setting lens, for my needs very sharp from edge to edge even at full aperture; it has a very high microcontrast that on the one hand facilitates sharpness, on the other it slightly compresses the tonal passages compared to a classic lens. However, it has a pleasant yield, with clean and natural colors, better than the samyang counterpart that you resell for this reason, and it is reliable. It is also a very correct lens both from the point of view of distortion and chromatic aberration, it has no other obvious optical defects and holds the backlight very well. The flaws: first of all the electronic focusing, to which I just can not get used to and which in any case slows down the operations, in the sense that if I slightly change the frame the autofocus, which is also fast, before stopping it returns to the starting point making me lose that tenth of a second. Another defect, very bearable, is the footprint that is very different from the 35mm zeiss and samyang, which are almost pancakes. The construction is of light materials but well finished and seemingly solid. The semi-macro capabilities make it suitable for creative close-ups. Comparisons: compared to the tamron 35 1.8 sp clutters and weighs a third, it is just as sharp, has a few shades less and has much, much less chromatic aberration. Compared to the samyang 35 2.8 it is slightly sharper, built better, more comfortable in use and does not suffer from yellowish-magenta cast color; it is built better and is much bulkier. Compared to the zeiss 35 2.8 costs a third, has a more or less equivalent sharpness, has more microcontrast and less general contrast, for a less characterized yield, is built worse and is much more bulky. Compared to the voigtlander 40 1.4 it does not have the same completeness in tonal restitution and has much more microcontrast.

Baribal

sent on December 05, 2020

Pros: Sharpness, flare resistance, macro capacity, weight, tropicalization, cost

Cons: MAF speed, footprint for a 2.8 iris lens

Opinion: I write my first impressions after a few months from the purchase of the Tamron and after trying it in different photo releases. Let's start with the cons, the MAF is quite slow, the Sony 24-105 (another lens in my possession for the Sony E system) is certainly better on the 7RII, in any case nothing dramatic). It is a fairly "large and bulky" lens in relation to focal length and diaphragm. If you are looking for the most compact lens possible to use for street-photography, the samyang/sony equivalent is definitely a better choice. That said, the optics were an incredible surprise. I've had Sigma 35A and Tamron play it in the past in terms of sharpness and micro-contrast, probably overtaking Sigma at the edges (they're impressions, I didn't make direct comparisons). Good flare resistance and control of chromatic aberrations. It is not a macro goal, however the reduced distance of MAF can be a plus in some situations. Although bulky compared to other lenses, the lens is very light with a decent construction quality and tropicalization on paper. Who do I recommend tamron to? To all those who do not need a lens with very open diaphragms, they prefer an all-round optics with excellent value for money.

There are 2 more reviews. Show all »

Photos taken with Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2

Village

by TakeABreak
44 comments, 3825 views

HI RES 20.9 MP

Pity

by Baribal
34 comments, 1922 views

HI RES 22.7 MP

The last lights at Vico Equense

by Baribal
26 comments, 2268 views

Untitled Photo

by Baribal
25 comments, 1094 views

HI RES 40.9 MP

Zamek Mirów w chmurach.

by PRut
23 comments, 916 views

HI RES 8.1 MP

Fred - Palermo.

by Tety Pavan
21 comments, 594 views

Fog

by Acqua30
11 comments, 929 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Morning light

by Baribal
24 comments, 1088 views

The time

by Apollo79
17 comments, 887 views

HI RES 22.4 MP

Shelter

by TakeABreak
8 comments, 801 views

HI RES 12.9 MP

Untitled Photo

by Morrison66
7 comments, 1779 views

Design Week

by Mav3r1ck
0 comments, 392 views

HI RES 17.3 MP

Little rascal

by TakeABreak
4 comments, 876 views

HI RES 8.2 MP

Mills at Kinderdijk

by TakeABreak
9 comments, 326 views

HI RES 15.8 MP

Bassano del Grappa

by Luca Pieretti
8 comments, 670 views

Zamek Mirów w chmurach.

by PRut
4 comments, 267 views

HI RES 8.1 MP

Monument to the Fallen

by Lele54
2 comments, 1484 views

HI RES 23.4 MP

Hands at work

by Riproviamovà
24 comments, 419 views

HI RES 6.3 MP

Untitled Photo

by Baribal
5 comments, 631 views

HI RES 42.2 MP

Shadows and lights

by Frenkisax
2 comments, 814 views

HI RES 20.3 MP

Milan City 1

by Lele54
3 comments, 1594 views

HI RES 12.9 MP

Urban Architecture

by Lele54
0 comments, 1145 views

HI RES 22.8 MP

Experiments

by Max Pacifici
0 comments, 730 views

HI RES 24.0 MP

Serena

by Ivanphotographer
2 comments, 1058 views

HI RES 7.5 MP

The intricate ancient center of Genoa

by Tety Pavan
2 comments, 491 views

HI RES 4.9 MP

Dark on the delta

by Riproviamovà
8 comments, 323 views

HI RES 6.3 MP

El Capitan

by Bbiggs
1 comments, 238 views

HI RES 46.5 MP

Beach of S.Maria Island of Sal - Cape Verde

by Tety Pavan
4 comments, 166 views

HI RES 8.3 MP

Neapolitan Theatre in Venice

by Spano60
1 comments, 53 views

HI RES 11.3 MP

View from Spianata Castelletto on the port - Genoa

by Tety Pavan
0 comments, 397 views

HI RES 8.7 MP

Świ?teczny Kraków, Polska.

by PRut
4 comments, 178 views

HI RES 8.1 MP

Gaggiano Naviglio Grande Milan

by Tety Pavan
6 comments, 243 views

HI RES 9.5 MP

Publish your advertisement on JuzaPhoto (info)

Foliage 2021

by Krull
0 comments, 525 views

HI RES 5.0 MP

Santa Marinella 04.18.2022

by Marco Palomar
3 comments, 449 views

HI RES 24.2 MP

Masks smile

by Spano60
2 comments, 78 views

HI RES 5.3 MP

Pearl

by Phshoot
4 comments, 243 views

HI RES 8.7 MP

Untitled Photo

by Condòfoto
3 comments, 94 views

HI RES 12.6 MP

The sample photos are selected automatically between all photos posted by JuzaPhoto members, using the camera and the lens selected in the techs. If you find evident errors (e.g. photos taken with cameras and lenses that are not available yet), you can contribute to improve the page by sending a private message to the user that has entered incorrect values in the photo caption.

Reviews » Lenses » Lenses Tamron » Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2

Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2 : Specifications and Opinions

Buy

Offerte Usato RCE

Reviews

What do you think about this lens?

Photos taken with Tamron 35mm f/2.8 Di III OSD M1:2