|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fenicio79 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fenicio79  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: f/2.8, sharpness, value for money Cons: construction materials, is not an effective 50mm (is a bit less) Opinion: I bought this lens to replace my canon 17-85 is usm and I must admit I was really surprised. The sharpness in the center is excellent on all diaphragms, a little less on the sides that see the best results from f/5.6 up. The flare is quite low as well as the aberazione color! Lately I wanted to compare it to, only on the front of the sharpness with the Canon 50mm 1.8 I have, and found that the Tamron is much higher on all diaphragms compared to any extension, (so I assume that it is also the canon 50mm 1.4 that coast perhaps more than Tamron in question). F the engine in my opinion is not fast enough to be ultrasonic, a bit noisy but nothing che.rnIn conclusion I think it is a very good and versatile lens that has nothing to envy to the optic same price. sent on January 09, 2013 |
 | Tamron SP 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di VC USD Pros: Stabilizer very good, fast ultrasonic motor, value for money, lens hood, rugged construction, sharpness Cons: is a little pesantino Opinion: was and still is my first tele and almost immediately I was impressed, I never thought you could get such a result from a 70-300 zoom statement. Certainly much better than its competitor Canon that costs € 100 in più.rnL 'only thing I found is inconvenient to use this lens with a tripod, unfortunately not having the locking ring is a little pesantino to fix the machine on the head, but all in all it is a small thing. sent on November 21, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
