|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vitto.92 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Vitto.92  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 18-35mm f/1.8 DC HSM Art Pros: Sharpness already wide open, perceived quality, brightness, holds great flare and AC, reduced minimum focusing distance Cons: dimensions and weight, difficult to AF to be calibrated, almost always required USB dock, small zoom range, does not cover the Full Frame Opinion: I had this great lens from Pentax and when I switched to Nikon I could not help but buy it back. outstanding optical quality, always crystal clear, at all focal lengths and also wide open, that's better than many fixed, is stunning. Chromatic aberrations and flare are almost entirely absent, very difficult to find, and the focus is quiet and pretty fast, really feels like the good qualities, it gives the feeling of being well built. Some small difettuccio there, but I can assure you that the advantages are far greater and will definitely diminish the importance. In visual terms it can be said only that TA is a bit of vignetting, I like, but if you want you off with one click in post-production, while the rest of the defects are the size and weight fairly important (but it was inevitable for a zoom 1.8) and the fact that if you do a good calibration with hardly otterrano satisfactory results Sigma USB Dock. Let me be clear, it is important to performKing calibration on all lenses, in combination with every body, but with this Sigma it becomes absolutely essential, otherwise you might be disappointed. Another small flaw, but it was inevitable, is reduced excursion of the lens, in some cases could use to get off a few millimeters lower, but above all to climb a few millimeters more on the 35. And 'a lens of which I fell in love, so much so that I find myself working with D7200 and D750, and I was thinking of taking a D810 to be used in combination with the D750 in the area double, but the problem is how to replace the 18-35! Qualitatively, the solution would be to take three good fixed (type Sigma 24, 35 and 50 1.4 ART), but would be very expensive and much less convenient and versatile, because you should stay constantly to change his lens. In short, a lens recommended to all who feel able to exploit it and to put in mind that a successful calibration of FA with dedicated dock (sold separately) is required. sent on September 29, 2016 |
 | Nikon D750 Pros: Autofocus, high ISO output, dynamic range, malleability of files, ergonomics Cons: shutter that arrives '' only '' to 1/4000 '' Opinion: Using this machine for less than two months, but I've got already several thousands of shots (3 works), and I think I can express my opinion. It 'a very balanced machine that allows you to do just about everything and do it well, the autofocus module is really great in all conditions, tracks the subject with no problems even in the dark, the sensor is always live, has an excellent dynamic range and very well also involves a very high sensitivity. The files that churns out are very malleable, even if they have already triggered at fairly high sensitivity, the ergonomics are excellent, the handle does not tire even after a full day of use. That said, it is definitely a very good car, perhaps the only two details a bit subdued than the rest are the burst (not at the levels of the best) and the plug that falls up to 1/8000 '', but for most photographers are unimportant details. sent on June 15, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
