|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Ilmore52 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Ilmore52 ![]() |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 16-35mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: Focal excursion; Weight content; Possibility of using circular filters. Cons: Strong distortion at 16 mm; Very poor sharpness especially on the edges; hood; High price. Opinion: Taken, used on the D800 but immediately resold for 14-24. A 16 mm. The distortion is very pronounced, and the sharpness is poor especially on the edges and even the most closed diaphragms. Intermediate focal lengths improve slightly and then get worse again at 35 mm. Because the FF focal range for a landscaper is ideal, because it has a low weight and because it is possible to mount regular circular filters. But what does Nikon expect to see it again? I envy the canonists for their zoom counterpart who is a blade and it costs even less! sent on July 14, 2017 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me