|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Raffaele82 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Raffaele82  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Canon 5D Pros: Full-economic frame. Good resistance to high ISO (relative to the age of the project). If you do not have the need to make large prints, is one of the best cameras to generate static. Cons: Lacks the automatic cleaning of the dust. The display is not reliable for assessing the quality of the photos. Gust poor. Opinion: I use my 5D for three years. My thing is the landscape in which I found a few flaws. Up to approximately 800 ISO is used safely. In some cases, the file is usable even in 1600. The colors and the quality of images seem impeccable. The powder comes often and often must clean the sensor. The display is not very indicative and sometimes to monitor the pictures turn out better than expected. It has a little flurry, but for my use is not a defect. sent on January 11, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0 L USM Pros: Handling, resistance to flare, excellent value for money. F / 4 more than enough for the type of lens. Cons: Lack of sharpness at the edges, noticeable distortion and not always easily correctable. Opinion: For what it costs is a bargain. E 'light. I do not think it is weather sealed but at the same time is quite robust. A little gem with which you can try discreetly in landscape photography but also in street (those are a boon 35-40 mm) .rnIl 17-40 has two glaring flaws: the distortion very evident between 17 and 24 mm, not always easily removed in post-production, and the lack of sharpness at the edges. It should always work from f / 8 and up, to stem the problema.rnNel Overall, I'm still very soddisfatto.rn sent on August 16, 2014 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
