|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
TropiePM www.juzaphoto.com/p/TropiePM  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Pros: Price, light weight, 2.8 fixed, sharpness Cons: Not stabilized, plasticky material, lens hood unwatchable Opinion: This goal has been a pleasant surprise! Hard to find a fixed 2.8 of this optical quality at this price. Of course, the materials are not at the top, but not by a sense of fragility, if not for some components. Also the fact that the lens is light for me is a positive factor. A day with 24-70 2.8 Canon (I have had the opportunity to try to be a friend) or worse with the equivalent (bad) Sigma me very tired because the weight. Too bad this little gem does not reach 24mm, otherwise it would have been almost perfect (obviously in relation to the price). The focus is not bad, not too noisy although not ultrasonic. Obviously we do not expect the speed and precision of Canon L. What is amazing is the sharpness, good even at 2.8 over the entire focal length. The best gives him up to f4. I compared the sharpness of this lens with that of the Canon (L!) 24-105 f4 F4 and the Tamron is slightly better result. It suffers less flare. Therevignetting buy at 2.8 but it is not intrusive (I use it on FF). The "" lock button which serves to lock the zoom is fragile to the touch and the sense of breaking down at any moment. Great blurred that offers: soft and pleasant. Excellent also the minimum focusing distance. There is hope even to approach such a subject, but the Tamron still focuses! Too bad the Tamron has fallen into banal details like the hood, made of "plasticaccia" light that seems fragile. Also awkward to assemble and disassemble. But it certainly is not the hood that makes the quality of the lens. Certainly also has other defects: the color rendering is not exciting, it is not stabilized nor tropical conditions. But at this price you can not expect certain things! In conclusion, I highly recommend this little gem. ;) sent on May 17, 2016 |
 | Yongnuo EF YN 50mm f/1.8 Pros: Cost, brightness, price quality, sharpness Cons: Plastics not on top, small ring (same equivalent problem canon being a copy) Opinion: Quality of surprising slow when compared to the price. Bought it new on Amazon for just € 60, I could not be happier. Certainly the plastic quality is not great, but for the price range is more than normal. Carefully remove the protective plastic before you start shooting. I found numerous reviews suspiciously too negative of this objective, and searching well I found that many hasty reviewers have forgotten to levarle getting unpresentable images. Great that produces the blurred, well softer equivalent Canon having the aperture 7-blade and not 5 (obviously at TA are equal). Good sharpness, although not perfect in TA, but above the 2.8 returns very well-defined images. The AF is perhaps a bit 'louder than the Canon, but I do not see it as a problem, at least for the use you do with it. Probably this is a case where the copy than the original! Highly recommended. sent on April 02, 2016 |
 | Canon 5D Mark II Pros: build quality, ergonomics, price of used, joystick, iso held Cons: AF perform poorly, slow burst, banding, and not only CF slot SD Opinion: Great nice car. In his hand is a tank, all the buttons are in the right place. I believe the joystick essential for you to select, albeit few, the focus points. The build quality of the Canon 5D series is well known. Despite her age makes her feel is a quality FF. Iso excellent seal up to 3200, but you can reach well into 6400 with a little 'postproduction. Obviously from this point of view is not up to current 6D and 5D MKIII, but he always despite his age. Very advantageous price of used, also in view of the output mark iv. AF not the best but if you stick to the central point does not miss a beat. In any case, this limitation does not make it suitable for sports photography (and not even not designed for this). Number of megapixels in my perfect view. Produces files neither too heavy nor too faint. Excellent opportunity to get to time to 1/8000, which in the current 6D is not possibile. Only real problem I found to what I have to do is a very strong banding in low light shooting in RAW, which is accentuated much in sRAW forcing me to throw away a lot of nice pictures. Although I have the latest version of the firmware the problem seems to be solved. The problem does not occur in JPG, shame that no shots ever in this format. In conclusion, if you want to take the plunge and enter the world of FF without spending a fortune this is the body, especially for portraits, landscapes and night. If you do birds or sports photos stay away. sent on March 31, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
