|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mr Bridge www.juzaphoto.com/p/MrBridge ![]() |
![]() | Sony RX10 Mark IV Pros: build quality, top quality optics, impressive autofocus for speed and accuracy, great files up to ISO 1600 Cons: Limited battery life Opinion: What about this sony rx10 mark 4 "the perfect bridge". A camera of absolute quality, it is immediately clear from the first moments that we are not dealing with a product designed for everyone, but only for those who are looking for practicality but without compromises and therefore willing to spend a significant amount. The camera body is that of a solid category flagship with excellent finishes and well-arranged controls "a cool aperture ring" on the optics, let's start immediately by saying that it left me speechless its macro mode capable of focusing at 600mm the subjects from a minimum distance of 70cm, this allows you to have a scary blur and very fine details, All this while being able to close the aperture down to F16 without going into diffraction. But of course it's its zoom that's its strong point, starting from a 24mm up to an incredible 600 f4, all with an excellent performance from the center to the edges, challenging for sharpness and level optical quality. But "a lot of power is nothing without control" and here Sony has outdone itself by equipping this bridge with the same autofocus module as the flagship Alpha 9 with 315 focus points and 24rrw per second, a machine gun that doesn't miss a beat. But of course everything is seasoned with a revised sensor to get the most out of it, compared to my trusty fz1000 I must say that I didn't find much difference, but already on the Panasonic the sensor is excellent up to 640 iso, beyond the Sony it begins to show its muscles and allows you to shoot well up to 1600 iso obtaining absolutely well workable files. In short, 7 years have passed since its launch, but even today it remains a concentrate of technology capable of assisting the photographer in any situation sent on April 25, 2024 |
![]() | Sigma 100-300mm f/4 DG EX HSM Pros: sharpness versatility versatility thanks to the excellent yield with the sigma 1,4x autofocus very fast Cons: lack of stabilizer Opinion: I bought this lens with some doubts, but I must say that it is an exceptional lens very clear to 300, but even using it multiplied does not disappoint the expectations, the stabilizer is missing and this for some could represent a limit of course if it were equipped would be better but at least for me it is not a problem, the autofocus is a splinter and even multiplied it retains all its effectiveness, what to say for me a great optics too little known but that I think represents a high level choice that despite the age of his project still holds head to today's optics of a certain level you can find it! sent on January 15, 2018 |
![]() | Panasonic Lumix FZ1000 Pros: good detail rendering even at 800 ISO, remarkable reactivity, excellent equipment (viewfinder / display) excellent optical quality, plasticky body but solid and well made, very effective stabilizer Cons: improved battery life, lacks tropicalization Opinion: it is expected that the bridge! This machine has everything you need, the speed of an SLR, the optical quality of un'obbiettivo midrange, and a yield at high ISO that I never imagined ... all in 831grammi Body well constructed that provides a great feeling of solidità.L'ho bought recently but I was immediately shown what stuff is done ... not be an exaggeration to say that with this machine comes the need to buy an SLR ... the details are read very well even if you croppa ... even at ISO 800 pp with a noise reduction of 20% you get beautiful images I took a macro to 1600 ISO, and I was stunned by the yield. ..l'autofocus in tracking mode does not give up and lets you capture even the airborne ... all with a lady raffica..il viewfinder is a joy to occhi..grande light stabilizer of 5 axes is extremely efficient and it lets get down to very low, in short, a beautiful reality at an affordable price sent on January 23, 2016 |
![]() | Fujifilm FinePix S100fs Pros: sensor, high efficiency, robust housing and well-placed controls, good optical quality (you can also take a f11) raw files exceptionally workable Cons: display and viewfinder dated ... to have a good yield of the details can not exceed 400 iso ... Opinion: the fuji s100 is the product of a very ambitious project that began life in 2008 ... the result is a camera that 100 to 400 iso can also compete with low-end SLR ... the super ccd eighth generation provides impressive results details on the management of releasing raw row heavy (22MB) but very workable forces only now with the advent of new sony and panasonic sensors with 1 "this camera has been exceeded sent on August 14, 2014 |
![]() | Fujifilm X-S1 Pros: excellent camera body well built with a excellent choice of materials, large optical ascursione good quality almost entirely usable, high-quality files up to 400 ISO, electronic viewfinder of the best quality of all the bridge! Cons: Autofocus is not fast, you have to use proprietary software to get the most out of raw, noise already at 800 ISO, Opinion: the fuji xs1 is the ultimate expression tecnolocica apllicata to the concept of bridge! offers a camera body well done! much better than some entry level SLR, not a dizzying speed that makes it less suitable for photos with dynamic players but good enough for landscape, macro etc. .. the optics from what I have seen is far superior to the objectives of the medium-low range SLR, see the various 70/300 etc. stabilized, products that already in itself cost as much as 300 or 400 Euros! has a wealth of functions, see the 49 points of focus, an electronic viewfinder of excellent quality, in short, to be honest you have to have it to understand its true potential, but if you believe that buying it to be looking at the classic bridge entirely self tip snaps and you are wrong .. the xs1 richede time as any SLR .. but the rewards will not miss sent on October 14, 2013 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me