|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Flaliv www.juzaphoto.com/p/Flaliv  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon 28mm f/2.8 AI-s Pros: Sharpness, Construction, Three-dimensionality, Dynamics, Color Yield Cons: They don't do it anymore Opinion: I took it 3 years ago from a friend of Juza's for about 100 euros, and I totally fell in love with this lens. A three-dimensionality to be frightening. Unfortunately they stole it from me last year, and I still cry if I think again and if I see the prices of the used... Beautiful color yield, very natural, not too contrasted, with a dynamic rendering on the blacks excellent. A smooth, pleasant ice to use, easy to focus on. On FF is the street lens. On APSC (42) it is very versatile even for portrait and I have pulled out the most beautiful shots I have in memory. Blurred not over-the-c--but incredibly "realistic" and with a cinematic non-sis. Who knows, maybe I speak only out of nostalgia, but as soon as I find it I buy it back, whatever it costs. sent on June 19, 2020 |
 | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: bright, 2.8 hard, solid construction, good autofocus and slienzioso - sometimes mistaken shots but it's ok -, bokeh, sharpness, color Cons: distortion at the focal earliest, vignetting (visible to 17mm 2.8), little three-dimensionality and depth Opinion: I state: I am not a professional and I tried this point for a few days. However I want to bring you back my positive experience. I previously purchased the Sigma 17-70 C 2.8-4, but since I needed more brightness and had not satisfied me, I sent back and replaced with this 17-50 2.8 I have to say it does its job very well. TA is perfectly usable, just close little to enhance all details of the really good foto..nitidezza. Bokeh like, the soft blurred at the right point, and this makes it in my opinion also suited for portraits. A real gem for the price (especially used). It Replaces 18-55 from kits admirably. Nevertheless, I am considering the idea of ??sending him back ... because in my opinion lacks three-dimensionality. At this price, to be a zoom, does his duty very well. 8 vote sent on September 01, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF 50mm f/1.8 D Pros: size, weight, clarity, performance in general, bright, very good for videos, blur and bokeh pleasing, made "creamy", QUALITY '/ PRICE Cons: some aberration, plasticky, does not excel at TA but nothing serious, lack of af model car is on some bodies (es.D3200, D5300 etc.) Opinion: This 50cc gave me much satisfaction. Objective 9, especially for the price. The colors are soft, not very saturated but I like it. In this price range it is definitely a great goal! Maybe some aberration too TA, but just close slightly and the situation is stable (even in sharpness). Not to mention the size so small ... it'll just love! sent on July 21, 2016 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: INTRODUCTION, USE APS-C: robust build quality, great focal range, crisp, vr, the macro is a huge bonus, a handyman in the true sense of the word, sigma colors that I like very much. Three-dimensionality to the first focal. PERFECT AS A HANDYMAN, returns photos that definitely will not regret it, af fast Cons: f 2.8 not fixed (it is not as bright as you'd expect), af wrong shots in the dark, blurred not like - a bit rough - that makes quite neutral pictures, without giving the "creaminess" and "depth" that I expected (ergo do not recommend it for portraits), some vignetting, distortion at 17mm, zoom "in reverse", plastic hood, TA does not convince me, vr not so great but it works ... I expected better! I found few differences from 18-55 vrii nikon from kits except in color Opinion: I state that I am not a professional, my work is more of the video and use Nikon D5300 ... I HAVE tested in various situations. At first impression, I was immediately very disappointed with this objective on which I have spent all my savings, but that in some ways I do not find so far from the Nikkor 18-55mm f / 3.5-5.6 AF-S (the one to speak kit ) - indeed, in some cases the second came out the winner. Only difference: the first € 360, € 30 in the second kit. 17-70 This does not convince me, distortion, vignetting and soft at room temperature, only plus 2.8 with which you can accentuate a detachment of the very pleasant and helpful to the first focal planes, but nonetheless we do not do much because the diaphragm closes immediately (22 / 24mm). 30 to 50 continues to close inexorably (50mm = max f / 3.8). A 70 soft at room temperature and little detail, detachment of hard floors. The Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f / 4-5.6 G VR VRI (80 € used) has a decidedly more pleasant blur. Recommended as a handyman, evenif it does not have much to envy to 18-55 from the kit if the focal first I found it very enjoyable, despite some distortion. sent on July 21, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 G VR II Pros: Sharpness more than acceptable, the fact that it is collapsible, great stabilizer, minimum focusing distance, 18mm, price, diameter 52mm, in non-dramatic flare backlight Cons: Distortion at 18mm, snubbed, plasticky, af ni but I've seen worse, a bit 'dark but from kits, infinity of maf ring not real !! ... Took a 29 € in kit, but that you mean. Opinion: Paid € 29 difference on my new SLR, is a kit lens that basically does his duty and returns the usable photos and appreciable. I state that I am not an expert. Excellent as a "war" objective since lightweight, small, collapsible and, considering the price, "maltrattabile" :) A 18mm distorts, but it is easily removable in pp. Backlighting and flare I found them quite present but overall pleasant. Sharpness remarkable for this price (from the kit), it takes 2 or 3 of the diaphragm and step goes better yet, eg the use of a D5300. The fact that it is collapsible making it even more compact and transportable. In my opinion do not buy again because it is unnecessary to spend € 110, better to keep something aside and move on to the upper zoom - say, a 17-50, but I would not recommend. Blurred a bit 'hard, but who cares. Conclusion: In short, the 18-55mm can give us nice photos and worthy, sure is a plasticone ... but to prove, since no è as dramatic as many believe, a good battle objective. sent on May 02, 2016 |
 | Nikon D5300 Pros: tilting the display, sensor generally good (not excellent resistance to high iso but decent, sharpness), jpeg quality, excellent quality / price ratio (taken again to 440 €), weight, excellent video (1080 50p) for max 20min, additional functions such as GPS, wifi, battery life Cons: Camera shake, live view slow, slow buffering, the viewfinder covers 95%, does not support many goals (af-d, and the ais, af old ... pretty much just af-s), it does not have the internal engine of focus, He does not preview in the viewfinder, for some functions you need to expand a little 'hands. Opinion: Socket 440 Euros, for this price is phenomenal. I state that I am not a professional. Before I had the D3100, D5300 paid about 500 ... this is a whole new world. The tilting display is very useful and convenient, if they did live view faster would be perfect: this is in fact essential for a preview of depth of field, but to shoot in this mode takes almost one second (even at 1/3000 ). The videos are truly remarkable. Suffers from shake-especially on objective non vr ... will be many mpx of DX. But all in all this is compensated by the good performance at high ISO. An excellent machine body, comfortable, with a great sensor (no low pass filter and with 24 mpx that give out details) that produces sharp photos. I do not know the difference compared to D7xxx, but certainly this has given me great satisfaction! sent on April 30, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 55-200mm f/4-5.6 G VR Pros: Focus better, the presence of the vr - albeit not great, the price (on eBay or used) took 80 €, focal length, weight, Cons: Sharpness so and so ... to TA bad, it is very dark, and noisy vr af, af uncertain, minimum focusing distance, aberrations in TA, in general, all these problems are accentuated in the dark, Opinion: Unclear (contours on my TA to appear "smeared"), it becomes acceptable to virtually f8. Impossible to use at RT for aberrations and sharpness. Dark, low light is difficult to manage the background noise, and VR is not much help. Bought at 80 €, is a useful all-rounder that basically has a nice yield, he left me the shots I am very satisfied, especially for the yield of the very pleasant blurry for the rest ... just remove the defects in PP. If you close a little after all it is quite clear. Good for iniziare.rn sent on April 17, 2016 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Pourability, vr, practical and useful excursion, Cons: Construction (although not to the touch), af slow and performs poorly in low-light situations, focus ring and manual focus in my opinion a little hard and without references, 105 loses much, dark, plastic hood, distortion at 18mm ... yield in general. Opinion: Assuming that is the first review I do, and I'm not a professional, this was my first goal (by Kit with d3100) and from the beginning has never satisfied me. It 'just as a lens kit, as versatile and not very heavy. However its minimum it does, and indeed even that bad ... but it has its counter A 105 is little usable, even more so if in dark situations. The manual focus without references is unpleasant, and speed situations this becomes annoying (more so for the fact that f is slow and does not always recognize the subject in low-light situations). In addition, the construction makes it not very solid delicate. The VR works with dignity (even if it is better than the 18-55 by Kit, Ver. II). In short, a lens to be very useful and practical kits, given the cost does his duty with dignity, but after a while 'you use ... is felt its limits. sent on March 25, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
