|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Stefanovet09 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Stefanovet09  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 100-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di VC USD Pros: light, handy, very sharp and with excellent blurry. Cons: maybe not very responsive in autofocus, but these are finesses. non-standard tripod ring. Opinion: I have been using it for 2 years and I personally found myself very well, for my needs. I find it very sharp, in line with the technical reviews I have seen and with a great blur (bokeh). I have no problem with the speed of autofocus (for superfasts suitable for bird photonaturalism you have to look at something else, much more expensive). I find a fall in style the lack of tripod ring not included in the package. Otherwise very good as far as I'm concerned. sent on December 08, 2020 |
 | Nikon D610 Pros: Sensor, EXPEED3 processor already very good, noiselessness shutter, dynamic range, ISO tightness more than good. Cons: Maybe (but really maybe) the concentration of 39 points autofocus and burst not very fast, but only for those who do naturalistic photos. But that kind of photography unless you talk about camera bodies from 51 points and 10 fps burst, the rest is too little anyway unless you talk about a D4s or a D5. Opinion: I bought it two years ago, coming from the D700, then already a fantastic reflex. The difference in dynamic range and acquired details is very relevant, as is the ISO seal. The controls are comfortable and even the ISO setting, with the ISO compensation feature, becomes easy to handle with the camera's rear wheel, avoiding the automatic ISO mode, not always adequate. Sorry that you miss the rear AF-ON button. The discussions on Pro body, semi Pro or FF entry level are academic, because everything always depends on what the camera body we want and what kind of photography we do. I do landscapes and street predominantly and for this kind is widely satisfactory even in low light conditions.. But with a good lens you compensate. The weight is not impossible and always better than the 950 g of the D700. The D750 that I possess has something more certainly, starting with the sensor Expeed 4, but the D610 is really good. The true flaw more than the concentration of autofocus points is the number of autofocus points (39) and the focus speed, but it always depends on what kind of photography we make. For a passionate landscape photo goes excellently and also in the macro is very good. I'm satisfied. sent on February 02, 2019 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro Pros: price, build quality, brightness, sharpness, stabilization, HSM, possibility of close-up of a good standard (macro). Cons: a little "hard" image over the focal 50mm has no control focus full time, not fixed f/2.8 at all focal lengths. Opinion: It 'a very good lens quality, though not the EX series Sigma. I used it for a year and I found the highest level of image sharpness between 17 and 40mm; loses some 50 to 70mm, but I do not see it as a problema.rnCompete very well with the 16-85mm Nikon, which is much brighter and less expensive and even constructive level best, despite the focal range a little more time corto.rnOgni Sigma produces low-cost gems like this ... it's worth it as optical wild and not only to replace the zoom "kit". rnOra is replaced by the new C series, but despite being discontinued, if they find new and used still several outstanding of the old series. sent on February 16, 2013 |
 | Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Sharpness at all focal lengths. Excellent brightness. Fast autofocus. Stabilizzazione.rnCostruzione beautiful Cons: Weight. Size, but it is inevitable when a lens is stabilizzata.rnMancanza tropicalization. Opinion: I took it for sports coverage in May using it with the Nikon D300 and D300s and I must say it has excellent sharpness, like the "first lens". RNLA my copy does not suffer from any Front / Back focus.rnNelle APS- c, as the D300, is the equivalent of 70-200 of the full-size 35mm, which equals both size and weight version OS (stabilized). RNAs my view is a zoom absolutely underestimated. I think a Sigma 70-200 OS HSA (105-300 in real Aps-c) is too long and this minimum is instead often ideale.rnPurtroppo current trends affecting technical judgments, so this is looked at with a 3X zoom little enough, to torto.rnDecisamente instead a lens excellent. sent on January 30, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
