RCE Foto

(i) On JuzaPhoto, please disable adblockers (let's see why!)






Login LogoutJoin JuzaPhoto!
JuzaPhoto uses technical cookies and third-part cookies to provide the service and to make possible login, choice of background color and other settings (click here for more info).

By continuing to browse the site you confirm that you have read your options regarding cookies and that you have read and accepted the Terms of service and Privacy.


OK, I confirm


You can change in every moment your cookies preferences from the page Cookie Preferences, that can be reached from every page of the website with the link that you find at the bottom of the page; you can also set your preferences directly here

Accept CookiesCustomizeRefuse Cookies



Nicolataggia
www.juzaphoto.com/p/Nicolataggia



Reviews of cameras, lenses, tripods, heads and other accessories written by Nicolataggia


Microsoft Translator  The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator.

tamron_90macroTamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro

Pros: pretty low price, excellent optical performance

Cons: is not stabilized, noisy AF, it is not sealed, long excursion

Opinion: this was my first macro lens (and still is) the yield in terms of the image is equal to that of the more famous Canon EF 100 2.8 L IS USM. At the time I wanted to spend a little and I was richly rewarded. the canon, however, has some of its advantages: The first is that free-hand and under certain conditions can be very useful, it is more robust and the focus is silent and faster. All these put together outweigh the price of about 750 euro? for some people, others do not. If you use it for hiking and this lens is perfect. if you want to always be able to shoot in difficult conditions (rain, low light) the canon is superior. the choice is yours

sent on February 03, 2012


canon_24-105Canon EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS USM

Pros: excellent quality, excellent auto-focus and range of focal lengths, acceptable weight and price ok

Cons: Slight vignetting (on ff), slightly lower sharpness to 105 mm

Opinion: What can I say? I like all weighed the choice between this beautiful lens and the 24-70 f 2.8 beyond the price (I bought it at 600 euro used in place of 1050 of the new 24-70) was really tough. interesseva me very much: "2.8" and I had read the various difettucci of 24-105 chiariamoli immediately:-flare is no longer a problem. with the recent series has been corrected-vignetting is correctable in 2 seconds so if you really want to have a 2.8 this lens is not for you (the bokeh f 4 is not exactly the best). for EVERYTHING else is the suitable lens. I use it on aps-c and paired with a wide angle and a telephoto lens I have the complete set. of aps-c is lost but the wide angle is used the central part of the lens that is the best part. also 105 mm and about 165 become what it feels like. of acting will still be short but on aps-c is just fine. recommended |

sent on February 02, 2012




 ^

JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.

Mobile Version - juza.ea@gmail.com - Terms of use and Privacy - Cookie Preferences - P. IVA 01501900334 - REA 167997- PEC juzaphoto@pec.it

May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me