|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
MarChem www.juzaphoto.com/p/MarChem ![]() |
![]() | Canon 1D Mark III Pros: AF performance, fast burst, consistency and high performance, the sensor photosites advantages with large (ie with fewer megapixels): excellent workability of the files, good dynamic range, excellent quality "pixel level" looking at the picture at 100%, low tendency the diffraction apertures, trend shake-less than denser sensors, better fuzzy areas of focus than APS-C sensors, relatively lightweight files and be manageable by those who lack computer-date; robustness and weather sealing, large battery autonomy, 1/300 flash sync speed, shutter life. Cons: poor general versatility, specilaizzata machine "action" lack dell'EFSC (First Electronic Shutter Curtain) that electronic shutter in live-view which greatly reduces vibration (useful for macro and landscape), high weight, loud shutter, lack auto iso advanced functions, charging bulky batteries. Opinion: I recommend this machine for those approaching the wildlife photography or sports and has a budget but does not have the need to have a handyman camera body or those who want to use the body as a "fast" coupled with a more "from the landscape machine" and it has no weight problems and has no need to use extremely elvate sensitivity. With respect to the APS-H sensor I find it a very good compromise between the focal multiplication and quality, in particular the focus. Regarding the LCD is true that no great resolution, but the result is that the photos look much better then when you download, on machines such as the 7D instead the problem is the opposite, they look beautiful in the crystal clear LCD but often the real file it is much more disappointing! The machine is exceeded at sensor level in particular, but I think that a top professional range of a few years ago is now a good amateur with an image quality that rivals or beats even today many modern APS-C. sent on April 02, 2016 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me