|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Kantiano www.juzaphoto.com/p/Kantiano  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Fujifilm XF 18-55 f/2.8-4R LM OIS Pros: Construction, sharpness in the middle, stabilizer, size, value for money in the used. Cons: full-opening edges. Opinion: I have been trying this for two months, I have read a lot in this forum and also in the various reviews, I give my opinion with my example: after several tests at home and in daily use, I can say that it is a good optics at both 18 and 55 in the middle part has a good sharpness that becomes very high to diaphragms 5.6; its weak point are the edges, at full opening is nothing that, however at 5.6 recovers a lot and becomes very good, losing slightly to more closed diaphragms, excellent stabilizer, very good construction even if it is not tropicalized. The MTF data of the various American and German forums give me reason, but one thing everyone says: you have to find the good specimen, because actually there are specimens that do not have this yield and therefore the various comments of very disappointed users can find a reason, I can say that I was lucky. I highly recommend this zoom for the value for money in the used that currently twists, it's worth them all. sent on April 08, 2020 |
 | Tamron SP 45mm f/1.8 Di VC USD Pros: Very high sharpness, neutral colours, objective construction, price, last generation stabilizer Cons: Focus Speed Opinion: Bought used, Sicuramenente not a trendy optics suffers the notoriety of the Sigma 50mm art, optical straoridanaria in my opinion, high sharpness already at 1.8, very neutral and delicate colors, boken to my taste beautiful and honest, stabilizer excellent, the only flaw is the Speed of focus, I had already read several reviews about it in the various American forums, I can confirm that it is not lightning, in difficult situations is just "sleepy" honestly in the reportage I would not recommend, in favor though compared to Sigma is Very accurate and does not suffer from front/back focus. sent on March 04, 2019 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS USM Pros: Tropicalization, quality, stabilizer, bright, blurred, robust Cons: Weight, not sharp (but nothing dramatic), old-fashioned stabilizer Opinion: It was the first "pro" optic of my dear friend, spending a fortune at the time when I used the rare occasions that lent him to me and my love was immediately; Subsequently also because of the many criticisms of the forums and with the release of the series II he sold it. After a few years I have just had the opportunity to buy it at a price drastically compared to the average value of the sales here on the forums (taken at the price of a stabilized whitewash used), which say to me like, handsome, very colors Thick cake, not the best of the sharpness that is, especially when compared to the new version but nothing catastrophic this I tend to say !. The stabilizer is not the maximum covers up to two maximum stops; It's heavy on the right, but at the end of the fair the files are beautiful.rn honest, if I did not find the opportunity at a higher price I would not have taken it, under the conditions for how I bought it I can say I'm very satisfied ! rn sent on August 04, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
