|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Rehel www.juzaphoto.com/p/Rehel  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | TTArtisan APS-C 40mm f/2.8 Macro Pros: Low cost, robustness, or at least it seems. Magnification ratio of 1:1. Cons: Almost impossible to use at long distances. Opinion: I took this lens to try some macros at a low cost and it works. Good sharpness and fluidity of the rings. Of course, if you want a more performing macro you should get a lens with a longer focal length, so as not to have to get too close. In fact, if you want to reach the maximum magnification ratio, 1:1, you have to bring the optics to three cm from the subject, thus removing a lot of light. The problem arises in the use at greater distances. I thought I had the added value of a lens that would allow both macro shots, both street and portraits. Unfortunately, it is very problematic to focus beyond the distance of one meter, one and a half meters. In fact, you can use a few millimeters of rotation of the in charge ring and it is not at all easy. But I must also admit that my vision is not the best and maybe there will be those who will not find particular difficulties. But the photos published here are practically all macro, not anything else. Except one with a very particular light. For the cap, if instead of a second I have to use two or three to unscrew it, for me it is not a problem, absolutely, I am not the fastest photographer in the west. And in any case a screwed cap will never leave its seat. Then, if it creates idiosyncrasies, just buy another universal one. A few euros and it's done. In conclusion, a macro objective that for what it costs offers results. Se cerca more, mh... Let's say that its ideal use would be more for still life, in the studio, and for not very small objects, where I think it has an excellent predisposition. sent on September 17, 2022 |
 | Fujifilm XC 15-45mm f/3.5-5.6 OIS PZ Pros: Focal width, compact and light, good at 15 mm. Used cost. Cons: Electric zoom. Opinion: Taking an XT1 I found myself choosing from the three possible zooms. In the end I opted for this 15-45, especially for its focal hike, it's actually a 22.5 from the wide side and that's a lot of stuff. It is sharp, especially as a wide angle, which is then what I use 90%, it is compact, it is light and taken used it costs very little. Of course, the electric zoom is brigand, but I am surprised that no one has emphasized an important detail: just assign the manual focus ring the movement of the zoom, and here we can adjust it more slowly and precisely, as we like. After this disappears the problem of the electric zoom. If I want something quick, I'm going to act with that, if I want more precision, with the manual ring. If you don't want to spend big money and don't want excessive weight and footprint, that's perfect! Of course taken used, new does not have a proportionate cost. sent on February 22, 2021 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
