|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Asala www.juzaphoto.com/p/Asala  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-40mm f/2.8 PRO Pros: Tropicalized, bright, impeccable construction, sharp Cons: I don't know Opinion: THE all-rounder lens, you cover us well over 90% x travel photography. Repeatedly used with an EM1 in the pouring rain, never had a problem. Minimum focusing distance, it is almost a macro. Very convenient also the ring x manual focus, immediate, effective and with the right excursion and resistance. If I had to keep one zoom only, it would be this. sent on December 29, 2021 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Bright, sharp, built that is a wonder Cons: A bit heavy? Opinion: I've had it for a week. Very satisfied. Flare? Yes, in certain conditions there is, but out of over 200 photos indoors / outdoors sunny day, the only ones with flare (which I like) are those in which you say "now I find a way to produce a little flare" and you do not always succeed. I don't see it as a problem. Minimum focusing distance practically in contact with the lens. Beautiful blurry, very soft. sent on December 29, 2021 |
| Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 7-14mm f/2.8 Pro Pros: Bright, sharp, built that is a wonder Cons: A bit heavy? Opinion: I've had it for a week. Very satisfied. Flare? Yes, in certain conditions there is, but out of over 200 photos indoors / outdoors sunny day, the only ones with flare (which I like) are those in which you say "now I find a way to produce a little flare" and you do not always succeed. I don't see it as a problem. Minimum focusing distance practically in contact with the lens. Nice blurry, very soft. Very satisfied sent on December 29, 2021 |
 | Olympus 2x MC-20 Pros: Impeccable construction. Double the focus. Cons: Especially with long focals it loses a bit in sharpness, but closing 1 or 2 stops improves a lot Opinion: Combined with the 40-150 f2.8 allows you to double the focus, at the cost of losing 2 stops (inevitable) and losing some sharpness, especially at the corners, but it recovers a lot closing by 1 or 2 stops. In the center obviously changes less, and 1 closing stop is enough to recover the detail. Considering the alternatives (the 300 mm f4.0 does not come cheap and, as far as I'm concerned, I would use it too little) is a great choice: use the 40-150 up to 150, and mount the multiplier if you have to go further. The multiplier from 1.4 is crisp and of course bright, but multiplies less.... As is often the case, in photography it is a matter of compromises p.s.: the pair 40-150-multiplier x2.0 is clearly sharp compared to the 75-300 p.p.s.: it requires updating the firmware of the machine, however linear and simple. Also supported by older models (EM5) sent on March 29, 2020 |
 | Olympus OM Zuiko 50mm f/1.4 Pros: Manually.rnProbably indestructible.rn Solid construction Cons: Inevitably soft af / 1.4. But already af / 2 changes a lot Opinion: The pleasure of a manual "manual" lens, where you control (both pleasant) mechanical both the focus and the diaphragm. Used on an Oly EM1, where it becomes a 100 mm canvas for portraits, even at full aperture. There are few focusing issues, very simple. Extremely clear from f / 2.8 included.rn Compared to a standard lens with auto focus it is another experience, mechanics have a more human being. I'm enjoying it, a classic case where the bounds of the object become a plus compared to an "all-automatic" .nnBagged on Ebay, in good condition, coupled to the EM1 with a K & F Concept Adapter (which unfortunately makes the button unusable close the diaphragm, defect is manageable.) i would like to try it on an analog body (like 50 mm true). sent on October 01, 2017 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
