|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Mr Chuck www.juzaphoto.com/p/MrChuck  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Meyer Gorlitz Primoplan 58mm f/1.9 (1952) Pros: Blurred - Blurry - Blurry Cons: Unclear at TA - manual focus - to fit on modern digital Opinion: And 'one of those optical defined as "vintage" and God forbid ... a few specimens could be as long as 60 years! I've bought only for its fuzzy, so use strictly TA and I love it for that. Her blurred is very special, very similar to the one of the most famous Trioplan 100mm f2.8, creating unique effects especially in the light. During the years when you search for perfection on the lens (see objectives super solving, razor-sharp and contrast) this is quite the opposite and it is perhaps here that must be sought its magic. sent on October 11, 2013 |
 | Panasonic Lumix G 14mm f/2.5 ASPH Pros: Dimensions - Weight - AF Cons: Vignetting TA (which I do not mind at all) - Distortion Opinion: Is irrelevant when considering the weight and size, this is a lens glued to leave the car when you're around. Great for street and reportage. The sharpness is excellent (but not glaring) already at room temperature. Unfortunately, you will notice a bit 'of distortion (especially when you get closer to the subject) nothing that can not be solved with 2 clicks in Photoshop. The vignetting is there but also here at TA, 2 clicks and you can fix, but personally I do not mind at all, and indeed, for some shots I tend to exaggerate. The price, if you got it used from kit is practically negligible (for the value of the lens), my copy I brought it home for 170 €. sent on May 13, 2013 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 45mm f/1.8 Pros: Dimensions - Weight - Blurry - Quality / price high Cons: Still have not found. Opinion: A lens that is incredibly more than it costs (I used him away for 200 €). It has a pleasant blur and the yield is already an excellent TA. When you consider the paltry weight of 116gr and size is a lens that can not miss in one kit micro 4/3! RNE 'recently also released version of this lente.rnrnp.s BLACK. I did too much tenderness the cap ... a little larger than that of a bottle of beer! : P sent on May 13, 2013 |
 | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm f/2.8 Macro Pros: Dimensions - Weight - Tropicalised (unlike what is written in the card) - Autofocus Cons: For now anyone Opinion: It was in the list of basic lenses to rebuild my kit, from Canon FF (with 5D old) OM-D. I used to play on Canon 100mm USM Macro, and then I needed a payment system on the 4/3. E 'was love at first click. Excellent performance even at room temperature, happily took a few portraits. The autofocus is great for both speed and accuracy. Definitely convenient selector for distances of maf. For what it costs is strategic recommended! sent on May 13, 2013 |
 | Tamron 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Pros: Sharpness from TA - good contrast - Excellent construction (firmest) - Presence of key lock (despite the zoom does not have games and seems tight) - Stabilizer great, allows you to take time to very low without hesitation and not noisy at all (in Unlike that of the Tamron 70-300 vc) - USD rapid and very precise - Price below the Canon 24-70 series 1 and incredibly below the series 2 Cons: Maybe a little 'heavy (for me is not a problem and are not exactly Hercules: P) - Vignetting and distortion at 24mm (can be removed with 2 clicks in 10 seconds and in any case I do not mind the vignetting) - For those who use filters, mounting 82mm from those, we have to consider the expense. Opinion: EXCELLENT! There was just a good feeling. compared to 28-135 canon another planet (and God forbid!). solid construction, I enjoyed the key lock so you do not run into unexpected elongation of the lens (which happened to me on the canon). fast autofocus, stabilizer that triggers a 1/20s without thinking much the problem. a little 'pesantino but if I want to travel ultra light use other (Fujica film or mirrorless Panasonic). thought to suffer from the lack of millimeters in length (from 70 to 135 there is a difference) and yet nothing, but the 4mm less (24 against 28) I do not even think we have done. on balance (a blow to my wallet) are STRA SATISFIED purchase! sent on September 25, 2012 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
