|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Beppe www.juzaphoto.com/p/Beppe  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 S Pros: Compactness, possibility of mounting filters, optical performance (all) Cons: Nothing Opinion: Taken a few days ago, for now I just tried it but I'm convinced it will become my favorite lens. Lightweight and compact has impressive performance. No sharpness fall up to the edges, almost absent chromaticism, nearly invisible flare even with the sun in the frame, more than acceptable distortions; No lens had or tested until now (24-70 S excluded) approaching it. Even the mechanical construction is very good, of course it is all plastic but to me it looks of excellent quality. About the aperture is an F4. True, but at F4 is already at maximum performance and if this is the price to have a superwide angle of half a pound that I also in the pocket of the jacket to which you can fit the filters are well pleased to pay. Rated 10 sent on May 03, 2019 |
 | Nikon D7100 Pros: Sharpness, light weight, accurate AF, just to mention the main functionality Cons: Internal buffer, jpg noisy Opinion: Let's start with things that are not: rnIl buffer is actually small, I do not do photo hunting or sport and not use the burst but I've still to fill it (with a SD 30M / s). RnScatto always and only in raw but I tried jpg and I think it improved. A little 'too noisy probably a choice to keep intact all the rest dettaglio.rnrnPer only impressionirnDettaglio and excellent sharpness of the DX sensor are exceptional and very well cashing in over-and underexposure are also 2 stop.rnPer As for the noise I have to say that you can see it already at 100ISO, slowly rising up to 1600 and then increased in 3200 and 6400 much that I think the limit accettabile.rnE 'but very uniform and almost no chromatic, easily eliminated (at least until 1600ISO) in post production, with a slight loss of most delicate tones (from 400) and detail (from 1600). rnL'autofocus is great, fast and accurate even with optics not really comfortable and the top of nearly all campo.rnStrutturalmente looks solid but is light and the size knownot the minimum necessary to contain the excellent display.rnMolto good battery life, easy to get to 6/700 shots under normal use. rnHa many functions (some amazing) and all comfortable enough to reach (after a little practice) but lacks the ability to hide all the items you do not use (and there are many) a function that had the D80 and I found comodissima.rnrnIn conclusion a very good car, but be careful, it is not easy to exploit meglio.rnServono lenses of medium / high, the 70-300 VRII to 5.6 is unusable better to shut up and to f8 to 400/800ISO and also the 16-85, I believe that a good goal, at full aperture clearly shows his limiti.rnInoltre to give the maximum (which I think has not yet reached) the D7100 should be used well (camera shake you see now), known perfectly (safety times, ISO , the goals, etc.) and the files are processed in a manner adeguata.rnrn sent on August 18, 2013 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6 G ED VR Pros: Good optical and mechanical quality, VR, 16-85mm range, lightness Cons: Brightness Opinion: TOP is not a view, but it definitely has an above-average quality, and this justifies the higher price of direct concorrenti.rnL 'range from 16mm to 85mm make it an excellent all-rounder leggero.rnA 16mm vignetting evident, but not excessive, for the rest good sharpness already wide open, flare content and a mechanical quality ineccepibile.rnOttimo the VR, is easily snaps to 1/4-1/6 of focale.rnrnCaldamente recommended; to find better, and not always, you have to get to various f2.8 but at prices much higher. sent on February 13, 2013 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
