|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Aspagnolli18 www.juzaphoto.com/p/Aspagnolli18  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron 80-210mm f/3.8-4 Pros: Sharpness-construction-lightweight and robusto- F3.8 / 4 (practically a 80-210 f4 Cons: nobody Opinion: Optical I inherited from my father, who used a Fujica ax3 now use on Sony A77 after purchasing the Tamron adaptall2 for minolta. magic optic has a sharpness that is unbelievable and thanks to the OLED viewfinder manually focus is not a problem indeed. I made the shots at a concert without missing a colpo.rnottica who has his years but which allows for a more thoughtful approach to the shooting because of the manual focus. recommended on ML for the vintage look that he pulls out. sent on May 24, 2016 |
 | Tamron 200-400mm f/5.6 AF LD IF Pros: focal lenght of APS Brightness Fixed- Cons: for the price of none Opinion: very interesting perspective, the use of Sony A77 and I have to admit that as IQ has not disappointed me. the focus speed is good and the price at which it is located around deserves. Not recommended for those who only naturalistic and sports photos that require a high-performance optical but for occasional use is just fine. Also because of APS_C you have a 300-600 f5.6 which is not bad. sent on May 24, 2016 |
 | Sony SLT-A77 Pros: constructive-price-quality in used as image- yield up to 1600ISO- stabilizzatore- electronic-magnification viewfinder mirino- stabilizer Cons: term bacteremia availability optical usate- slide minolta. Opinion: After a few months of use and some serious service brought home I can express myself on this by the astonishing body macchina.rnrnPartiamo against: the first thing is the battery life that varies from 450 to 600 shots (I did sports photos in a volleyball tournament and after 650 shots I still had 30% charge while in other cases after 450 shots was dry) thing solved with the purchase of a battery grip which increases durability and above all makes the body more stabile.rnaltro point against machine the sled flash minolta which is a bit traballante.rnrnper regarding the pros we would have to write a casino. first of all the OLED viewfinder that is fantastic in both the Manual Focus thanks to colored piping that is created around the subject in focus. The picture quality is really very good and you can recover both burned areas shaded areas without much trouble. rnSi says he does not have a great resistance to noise but to be honest I quietly took up to 1600 ISO exposing to the right and the result is always eccezzionale.rnL'AF is very good with a very good copertura.rnrnQuesto camera body to my mind is a body that can be used for years without problems both for good weather sealing for both versatilità.rnrnUtilissimo as always the inner stabilizer body macchina.rn sent on February 29, 2016 |
 | Tamron SP 17-50mm f/2.8 XR Di II LD Pros: Price-sharp 2.8-excursion focale- Cons: Attaching the lens hood dancer Opinion: Taken for use on a Sony A200 and I must admit that is outstanding. Version Made in Japan with no Front-Back focus problems as reported by others and already crystal clear to 2.8.rnPerde a bit to 50mm but if used between 30-35 is a blade. Then calculating that with the crop factor of a APSC is like having a 25-75 2.8 therefore in line with the objective standards used by millions of photographers ... rnMi am very pleased and now look only to mount it on a more handsome body. rnDopo some time I realized that the bayonet which engages the lens hood has a slight play. Nothing problematic in use but to feel comfortable l I fixed with duct tape nero.rnP.S. Mass is said to slow fire inaccurate and noisy but I must say that I am using it on a a77 and not known none of these defects. sent on November 07, 2015 |
 | AmazonBasics - Zaino porta reflex/laptop Pros: price-quality space-shoulder your commodity many tasche- raincover included. Cons: We have to open it to extract all SDEL attrezzatura- down a bit soft Opinion: I purchased from about months and I must admit that plays its full duty. Included is the raincover that in case of rain is mounted in a second and it works great. Useful straps for attaching the stand side giving access to the equipment without having togliere.rnAltro point in its favor is that it is completely anonymous to seem almost a normal backpack. plus especially in street.rnper price article consigliatissimo.rnio took me a Sony A200 with 17-50f2.8 Tamron 70-300 Tamron 18-70 sony, flash, trigger, cables and wires, a tarp for not infangarmi outputs macro and nature, filters of audiovisual piasta with filters and lens hood. and to be honest there is still enough space for a pious fixed lenses. removing the towel a 70-200 f2.8 there enters comfortable comfortable: D sent on November 04, 2015 |
 | Tamron 70-300mm f/4-5.6 Di LD Macro Pros: range focali- sharpness-macro function f4 up to 180mm Cons: front element rotates with the focus. no attachment to tripod Opinion: Quest'obbiettivo use for about 2 years (when I bought the first SLR) I mount on a Sony Alpha 200.rnL'obiettivo is to learn to know and for the focus that sometimes goes crazy and for the sharpness you lose a little dai200 to 300.rnUtile for street and portraits provided you use it up to 200, where 200 to 300 f4.5 becomes convenient for sports photos luce.rnin very low light conditions must know gestire.rnutile macro function that allows you to arrive at a minimum distance of 0.95. selector and precise enough duro.rnio use this light almost always when I need a canvas. Contrast and sharpness are resolved easily PP although under the right conditions have not noticed any major problems. Good for portraits and the focus on sony macro.rnUtilizzandolo lack stabilizer is not a problem since I have the camera body stabilizzato.rnPer last add that the front element rotates in the focus and use the filri plate model becomes Coockin a little uncomfortable because you have to reset every time the filtro.rntutto all a buOn telephoto starting to have fun and to understand that range telephoto servire.rncomunque we can go I think will always remain in my equipment thanks to its versatility and good opening diaframma.rn sent on October 22, 2015 |
 | Sony A200 Pros: Entry level cost-of-good-stabilized AF motor on the camera body Cons: Burst-Mirino- High Iso-sled Flash Minolta Opinion: I bought Qusta machine as first SLR about a year and a half ago used because of the very low cost. I must say I was not disappointed at all and definitely keep as a second body or to bring my partner to photography. Very good as first SLR for both ease of use and for the good that produces RAW files (not shooting ever in JPG habit) the lack of live wiew not felt the way I take. I decided to change it as it is an entry level and start up with me a little cramped. The only flaw is the difficult availability of quality optics used and then the very high costs for upgrading dell'atrezzatura. Very durable, it happened to use it in the rain and did not make a peep though it is tropicalized. Another is the sled against the attack of the flash that is so urgent that Minolta and an adapter to use flash or universal accessories. Machine recommended for those who are not afraid to spend on new optical or simply want an SLR arounddo. Otherwise advise staying on Canon or Nikon is not the quality of the images but to the availability of material used at good prices sent on August 26, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
