|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Runrobirun www.juzaphoto.com/p/Runrobirun  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon AF 60mm f/2.8 D Micro Pros: Sharpness, construction, used price Cons: None for its kind Opinion: A lens that, despite the age and the fact that has been replaced by a new model, remains between the top macro. And 'impressive sharpness! On several occasions I had to redo the shot, clearing the scene well, because in the first picture was emerging details that the naked eye did not notice (dust, smudges, stains, etc ...). Also it is very solid and the fact that the front lens is embedded makes it impossible to dirty or worse rovinarla.rnPersonalmente the use, as well as a macro, also as a normal lens due to its length focale.rnOvviamente being designed as a macro in no hurry to put in fire for which for moving subjects it is slow and often inaccurate. sent on November 09, 2015 |
 | Nikon AF-S DX 35mm f/1.8 G Pros: Lens quality, price, light weight and small size Cons: Slight distortion at the minimum distance of focus Opinion: I used this lens for two years as a normal lens. The quality of the pictures is superb, and apart from some time I balanced the white in an order I have never made any post production to his shots. Also it is very light and small in size, almost seems not to have it mounted. For such a low price and for such a high quality (the result of a fixed lens and with years of planning behind it) is worth it just to use it occasionally. Only trick is that at short distances of focus tends to distort slightly (it's still a 35mm camera), but easily fixed in post. sent on October 20, 2015 |
 | Nikon D7100 Pros: Ergonomics, 51 autofocus points, 1 / 8000s, sensor, ISO Cons: Buffer with a limited capacity Opinion: Using the D7100 for a year, it purchased for photos everyday and sports. The body is made of a semi pro, strong and stable, with the controls in the right places and the possibility to customize some. Autofocus is excellent for long-range damage and distribution, precision, speed even in low light (focusing even with the filters ND 10x at sunset). The sensor produces dense RAW from which you can extract jpeg quality already with camera raw, and even at high ISO despite a DX behaves very well (I took photos in 3200 and with the minimum of post production I printed 30x40 perfect!) . The buffer has a limited capacity, but I think this is a false problem, in the sense that "strafe" produces many shots and increases the work in post instead if you get used to seize the moment and taking new 3-4 at most, you learn and read the scene and you will go home with less work to do. Many compare her with the D300 ... had side for two months and immediately resold ...Machine at a cost "normal" can give great satisfaction. sent on October 19, 2015 |
 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM Macro C Pros: Lightweight, compact, stable, fast and accurate autofocus, price Cons: Plug plastic hood a little hard Opinion: Use this goal by a year as a handyman on the D7100. And 'light and moves well around, compact and therefore takes up little space, the focus is precise and quick, stabilization allows you to take virtually always free hand during the day. Therefore, despite not having the 2.8 constant aperture, I prefer it to the various universal 17-50 and 17-55. Even liken it then to the Nikon 17-55 2.8, because it is useless to compare pro perspective that costs four times as much, but that certainly is not practical as this (the areas of use are too different)! To date, as a handyman it is unbeatable, and that those in more than 15mm in length make a difference. Besides the shots have a good yield is of details that color, and where it takes more than "full-bodied" just work (not too much later) in post production. sent on October 19, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
