|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Zino www.juzaphoto.com/p/Zino  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Nikon D750 Pros: Sensor, dynamic range, high ISO, tropicalized, grip, viewfinder, articulated screen, autofocus, autonomy, price, precise wb Cons: 1/4000, I had to send assistance to the shutter problem Opinion: I have owned it for two and a half years and I still believe it to be the best in terms of price quality, despite the two above written counterparts. Now the shutter problem has been solved and the 1/8000 (which has not) is necessary only in very rare cases, so I think it is a machine that borders perfection.rnVery good for any kind, at the time I bought it for this reason. I made landscapes, sports (even indoor = high iso), portraits and street with this car and has always behaved excellently.rnLa adore and of course the advice even today after almost 4 years since its release. sent on February 05, 2018 |
 | Nikon AF-S 50mm f/1.8 G Pros: Quality / Price, Sharp, Lightweight, Bokeh quite nice, fast and accurate af Cons: Toy maf ring, not tropicalized, CA present, but easily correctable Opinion: I took this goal a few months ago because I think having a 50in in kit does not hurt. I already own the 1.8mm 1.8mm I have realized, both on field use and thanks to various homemade tests, which has the same identical optical quality. The G series of Nikon optically does not disappoint, good sharpness at TA and from f2.8 to f11 become sharp as blades while keeping a good definition even at f16. Unfortunately, the construction is as playful as the focus ring. Attention, toy does not mean a little robust (the material with which they are constructed in theory should provide greater impact resistance by lowering the weight), this is just a feeling of touch. The blur is pretty nice and soft. It is slightly nervous only in some situations (trees and shrubs in the background for example), but nothing so severe. The color aberrations are present, but they are very easily corrected in the post. Considering the performance it offers and the price at which it is sold My vote is a 9 without even thinking about it. sent on July 26, 2017 |
 | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Pros: Price, 2.8, fast AF, blurred, stabilizer works well and is quiet, definition 3.5 onwards sublime Cons: Heavy and majestic (as all 70-200 2.8), initially necessitated adjustment of F / B focus (with the car), tropicalization (when needed) Opinion: I bought this lens is not knowing what went on against a 70-200 2.8 and how to handle it. I must say that after some initial difficulties, things went gradually improving. rnSi is certainly a professional lens, the quality is very good already at room temperature and can give fuzzy immensley. 3.5 onwards acquires clarity disarming. Af fast and precise, after making an adjustment in the car made in 10 minutes (my example suffered from front focus). The stabilizer works very well and offers you the opportunity fully stabilized or only on the vertical movements for panning for esempio.rnChe say optical amazing in terms of performance. Only negative in my opinion clutter; not very comfortable to carry for long trips, also certainly does not pass unnoticed .. The rest is definitely worth the expense. sent on November 04, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
