| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
|
![]() |
Canon 60D Pros: Dsplay, high ISO, practicality. Cons: From amateur, no defects. Opinion: Preface: I am an amateur photographer, although very demanding and passionate about technology. I bought the 60D because I need the APS C (animals etc.). 7D and the judge too demanding for size and weight. It has a lot of useless things (file processing in the car, creative filters), but the main things that really matter and there are and have quality. It also has an easy to use as a reference and picture quality really fine (I've used it only 17/40L and 70/200L + 2x extender and so do not know how it behaves with standard lenses.) So some criticism read (micro / sealing / magnesium alloy) are in my opinion misplaced whereas it is not a professional, it costs as a professional, but the performance we are very close. Super recommended for those coming from the series 400/550D. It 'a good choice for the amateur photographer who likes to engage in all kinds without any special preferences- sent on 13 Maggio 2012 |
![]() |
Canon 400D Pros: Robust, easy to use, high-contrast images with standard light. Cons: Noise over 400 ISO, in crisis in difficult lighting conditions, limitations due to the design period. Opinion: For four years my only digireflex, I'm waiting for the new version of the 7D. When combined with a lens of race (17/40L and 70/200L) images, light standard, they are really excellent quality. Logically lacks technologically by date design (ISO, AF, Burst, etc..) But I am very pleased with what he gave me over the years and I was able to learn the management of digital so you can now switch to a Canon more sophisticated. Certainly at the time one of the best entry-level. I would definitely recommend his descendants 550D/600D for those who want to experience. sent on 30 Dicembre 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me