|
Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Gianluca Tomarchio Vasta www.juzaphoto.com/p/GianlucaTomarchioVasta ![]() |
![]() | Nikon AF-S DX 85mm f/3.5 G ED VR Micro Pros: Sharpness is not imaginable in this range of goals, but at the same time discreet compact length macro being almost a 130 equivalent, stabilization, which makes it also a great semitele fixed. Cons: Perhaps the price Opinion: The price a little 'high means that few have in your bag or why below if you are just interested in the macro or go up if very interested, but if you feel you understand them worth tutti.rnL' I took when I started to use the digital SLR because I wanted a dedicated macro lens long enough but not too much because it is not my favorite type of photos. A few years later I can say I appreciate it so much as fixed for particular landscapes and portraits, as well as clearly that for macros. I do not sell it even if I spent a FF if mantenessi an APS-C. The only flaw is that I have in the current kit 70-200 f4 which is just as crisp and versatile, but often its length I prefer for the rendering of bokeh I like più.rnDi second hand would be a bargain. sent on March 01, 2014 |
![]() | Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/4 G ED VR Pros: AF fast, Exceptional sharpness, portability, though it seems, VR remarkable. Cons: Lack support stand, but at least for me it is a lens to bring and not to rest. Opinion: One of my favorite targets. I'm considering a switch to Canon for my kind of pictures that need many mm, but owning this keeps me very much, for fear of not finding an equivalent to the same prezzo.rnIo I use it on APS-C and 70mm is often too long for that I am a 105mm equivalent. On FF must be great and, again because of this lens I am considering seriously to pass. As it turned out they are at a major crossroads on the equipment, but continue to use it could be decisive on the choice. sent on March 01, 2014 |
May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me