|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Fedecoco www.juzaphoto.com/p/Fedecoco  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS HSM Pros: Focus, good construction Cons: Quality 'rather low, stabilization, focus Opinion: I bought this objective 'cause I read around pretty good advice, I wanted to use it as a handyman from "walking" to exit without my equipment below. I used it at the end in one holiday and sold soon after, unfortunately there 'was feeling with me. Stabilization just enough distortion to 18 mm, engraved file just a little 'at all focal lengths from 150 mm but up to my standards and' virtually unusable. Do not misunderstand, and 'a lens for the price tag can' certainly be purchased, as long as you know what to expect, not to be disappointed later. Ah, one of the pros and 'surely the construction of the lens, and I' seemed excellent, superior to several objectives such as the Canon 50 f1.8, 18-55, 55-250 just to give examples. sent on April 04, 2012 |
 | Canon 60D Pros: Handy, convenient to use and with lots of features Cons: Requires a certain level of optical, fine adjustments for missing targets, not weather sealed body Opinion: Ok, let's start with the problem of the body is not weather sealed: in reality 'the material' still very good and seems resistant even though I have no intention of making any test. The problem 'that previous versions had xxD tropicalized then it is immediately obvious to everyone as "missing" and not as diversity' for example. Same goes for the micro, probably 70% of users will not ever use, but if anything even once served, now there '. Let's move to the new 18-megapixel sensor, dense, makes her beautiful work, especially through the power of the Digic IV in the "clean up" the images to a noise level that what it 'is normal to be in a bit more' high compared with other sensors with less. And 'here that fits what' I wrote one of the "cons": I think this machine and 'excellent for those who upgrade from an entry level body, for example, provided, however,' that they have already 'a kit at least decent . Are often disappointing fact shots with expensive 18-55 IS kit or with various 17 -85, 18-135, 18-200, and any other "zoomone" third party see the many Sigma. I recommend shooting in RAW as always shoot in JPG and 'another case that makes us lose a lot of quality' because of direct compression performed by the machine. I agree with those who have reviewed it before me on the goodness' of the AWB that does not miss a beat, excellent autofocus and comfort 'of the swiveling display that before he criticizes harshly but once the machine is used almost half' of the times ! In short, the 60D judge as an "upgrade" compared to previous machines of the series xxD especially with regard to the video section and the multiple functions attached. Discourage other as the transition from a xxD 60D say because you will not find the big changes that would instead switching to 7D or FF, so to speak. Rating: 8 sent on November 18, 2011 |
 | Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM Pros: Focal length, quality 'optical stabilization Cons: Brightness ', price a bit' high, equipment (hood and pouch absent) Opinion: Giving voting 8 to this glass I lowered a bit ', the mean of Juza. Not that you are not satisfied, indeed, this Canon as already 'said more' times is the "solution" is ideal to all the problems of portability 'and versatility' of users APS-C. Use 360 ??degrees often feel the lack of brightness 'especially "going" with the focal length, the stabilizer anyway and' powerful and allows us to shoot at times absurd (with a minimum of a steady hand shots to take home 1 / 10). Sharpness and contrast at a high level, building very good not to be a L series, the first time I took it out of the box I was amazed of its compact size, despite the large diameter of the lens and filters' "short" and not particularly heavy. The 15 mm below have been one of the reasons that convinced me to choose it as my normal zoom, since I do not have a wide angle. Ps. the difference between 15 and 18 mm and more 'of what is often thought, seeing is believing. I have read that several elements have drift problems of zooming, my fortunately it has not yet, and 'something that could not stand. sent on November 16, 2011 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
