|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Vincenzo Fratello www.juzaphoto.com/p/VincenzoFratello  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Sigma 17-50mm f/2.8 EX DC OS HSM Pros: Opening in the first place, sharpness, stabilizer, built-in hood (yes, I consider it a pro), focus lightning, excellent value for money. Cons: just to be picky: heaviness (which is absolutely not a problem) Opinion: I bought this lens in January (my canon 18-55 left me) and I waited a while to review it to try really the qualities and defects. After 6 months I can say that I'm absolutely happy with the purchase! the lens is clean and razor sharp since f2.8 giving the maximum to F3.2 onwards. the autofocus is instantaneous and precise (for the price you pay the lens is too much). I use it mainly for photos in clubs at night with external flash and excellent results! The colors are saturated, sharpness at the top as mentioned above. A 17mm distorts a little but I like it so I do not consider myself a counter. A note that I do have accessories that Sigma provides: a plastic hood (of which many complain but as I said I love this lens haha) and a hard case very well done. Absent the full time manual focus ring and the distance but for the price you pay the building is secondary. The latter is not the best (plastic) but keeping the machine in hand the lens is pretty solid. In conclusion invoglio people seeking something more than usual objective standard provided by the house nikon and canon and want to do an upgrade: sharpness, aperture and autofocus speeds are the main qualities of this lens (the ones that ultimately we look in a lens) so if you have the opportunity buy it! sent on July 11, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L IS USM Pros: Construction in the first place, Series L, Tropicalisation, Speed ??AF (USM), Lightness, Sharpness, Stabilizer (2 types), maneuverability. Cons: "Only" F4, ring not included in the package Opinion: This was my first lens over 70mm. I wanted to stand tall choosing "bianchino stabilized" the four 70-200 proposes that the canon. Well I have immediately LOVE and would not go back for anything in the world. In the first place I put the all-metal construction worthy of a L-series lens and care of every detail. the lens itself makes her figure !! I chose the version stabilized F4 as it gets sometimes to recover 4-stop and also for the use that I do and 200mm in my opinion is a must to have the stabilizer (a bit noisy but it's nothing) that is proposed in two ways of use (mode 1 which works for any situation, the way that works for two subjects in motion perpendicular to the use of the camera). the lens is to clear all the openings, no vignetting nor neither distortion nor chromatic aberrations of any kind. if you have to just do a critique has a little flare but you can eliminate even more with the lens hood dotazion (not the best but there is). The locknuts are to smooth and pleasant to the touch. Presents the full time manual focus. My usage is on APS-C and I have to say that it very well on my 600d so I dare not imagine what would become of FF monster! The Council !! sent on February 11, 2015 |
 | Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 II Pros: Price, weight, Opening Cons: Built entirely in plastic (including the attack), AF Very noisy (not USM), Fragility Opinion: Aquistai this lens about two months after my first camera. The first impression is of an optical created just to be created .. but leaving out the construction and materials proved formidable perspective (even though we are talking about a f1.8). The sharpness becomes good since f2.5 /f2.8 maintaining a very good bokeh. Well what about the use in many situations both low light and in portraiture. Definitely a perspective that must not fail in a kit also saw the very low price. Indispensable! : D sent on February 11, 2015 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
