|
| Accept Cookies | Customize | Refuse Cookies |
Thule www.juzaphoto.com/p/Thule  |
The following opinions have been automatically translated with Microsoft Translator. | Tamron AF 17-35mm f/2.8-4 Di Ld IF Pros: Cheap, light, bright, compact size, profile on dedicated editing software, good autofocus, economic construction, but solid. Cons: Reviewable sharpness, color a little 'off, sealing the backlight "brutal." Opinion: Since you are gone (?) The old reviews put my. Had and scrambled for a year, what about ... enticed by the spectacular test of photozone (I do not know that he had been sent a copy, evidently an exemplary "particular") and some enthusiastic comments, given the availability to 200 Euros I got it now waiting for something better. Visually and physically I loved it, compact and lightweight, but these are not the things that matter .. The specimen in my possession was suffering from an internal reflection (large orange circle in center of frame) when pushed against the light (with sun in the frame). Sharpness a bit 'thick at all apertures and colors a bit' "autumn", extinguished, opachi.Usato at night (the Milky Way, landscapes by moonlight) I found it not bad, will be for the lack of contrast and colors much less influential. If you are looking for a view FF and landscape photography advice to give up, I would see him quite accomplished in key reportage and street combined with un'aps, given the good brightness and the optical characteristics that make it suitable for portraits. For a FF recommend use only if you look for a perspective for occasional use at night and do not want to spend three times more for a similar perspective (at this price has no competitors other than the Konika Minolta 17-35 which seems to have the same optical badged) or as spare car escort. sent on August 23, 2016 |
JuzaPhoto contains affiliate links from Amazon and Ebay and JuzaPhoto earn a commission in case of purchase through affiliate links.May Beauty Be Everywhere Around Me
